Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Research Article

Statin adverse effects: patients’ experiences and laboratory monitoring of muscle and liver injuries

Authors: Nataporn Chaipichit, Janet Krska, Thongchai Pratipanawatr, Narumol Jarernsiripornkul

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Although statins have great benefit on the prevention of cardiovascular diseases with limited adverse effects (AEs), little is known about patients’ contribution of AE reports in clinical practice. Objectives To explore patients’ experiences of statin AEs and related laboratory monitoring in clinical practice. Setting Outpatient clinics of two University hospitals in northeast Thailand. Methods Generic symptom checklist questionnaires for self-reporting AEs were distributed to patients prescribed simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin at outpatient clinics. Clinical information was obtained from medical records. Reported symptoms were assessed for causality considering previously known statin AEs, concomitant diseases and drugs. Main outcome measure Potential statin AEs reported by patients and monitoring of laboratory parameters related to musculoskeletal and liver disorders. Results Of the total 718 valid responses, 76.0 % of patients reported at least one symptom, most of which (69.0 %) were probable/possible statin AEs. Musculoskeletal and liver-related symptoms were reported by 283 (39.4 %) and 134 patients (18.7 %), respectively. Probable/possible AEs were categorized in 56.7 % of their musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal symptoms. Majority of patients had at least one laboratory test on initiation of (64.8 %) and during statin treatment (61.8 %). Patients taking atorvastatin or rosuvastatin, and patients with history of chronic renal diseases were more likely to have creatine kinase (CK) monitored on initiation of and during statin treatment. Additionally, taking drugs which could potentially increase muscle injury (OR 1.929, P < 0.01) and self-reporting of musculoskeletal symptoms (OR 1.805, P < 0.01) were associated with CK monitoring during statin treatment. Reporters of musculoskeletal symptoms also had significantly higher mean CK level than those not reporting any musculoskeletal symptoms (207.35 ± 155.40 vs. 143.95 ± 83.07 U/L, respectively; P = 0.037). Patient reporting of liver AEs was not related to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and monitoring, however, prior history of liver disorders was significantly associated with monitoring of ALT on initiation of and during statin treatment (OR 5.745 and OR 23.063, respectively; P < 0.01). Conclusion Many patients experienced at least one possible adverse effects on a statin. The findings suggest that laboratory monitoring is relatively selective in relation to risks and patient-reported adverse symptoms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;63(25 Pt B):2889–934.PubMed Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;63(25 Pt B):2889–934.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation. 106(25):3143–421. Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation. 106(25):3143–421.
4.
go back to reference Martin SS, Metkus TS, Horne A, Blaha MJ, Hasan R, Campbell CY, et al. Waiting for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel IV Guidelines, and in the meantime, some challenges and recommendations. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(2):307–13.CrossRefPubMed Martin SS, Metkus TS, Horne A, Blaha MJ, Hasan R, Campbell CY, et al. Waiting for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel IV Guidelines, and in the meantime, some challenges and recommendations. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(2):307–13.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Silva MA, Swanson AC, Gandhi PJ, Tataronis GR. Statin-related adverse events: a meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2006;28(1):26–35.CrossRefPubMed Silva MA, Swanson AC, Gandhi PJ, Tataronis GR. Statin-related adverse events: a meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2006;28(1):26–35.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, Mckenney JM, Miller E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR*Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;93:152–60.CrossRef Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, Mckenney JM, Miller E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR*Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;93:152–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference McKenney JM, Davidson MH, Jacobson TA, Guyton JR. Final conclusions and recommendations of the national lipid association statin safety assessment task force. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8A):89C–94C.CrossRefPubMed McKenney JM, Davidson MH, Jacobson TA, Guyton JR. Final conclusions and recommendations of the national lipid association statin safety assessment task force. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8A):89C–94C.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cohen DE, Anania FA, Chalasani N. An assessment of statin safety by hepatologists. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8A):77C–81C.CrossRefPubMed Cohen DE, Anania FA, Chalasani N. An assessment of statin safety by hepatologists. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8A):77C–81C.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Thompson PD, Clarkson PM, Rosenson RS. An assessment of statin safety by muscle experts. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8A):69C–76C.CrossRefPubMed Thompson PD, Clarkson PM, Rosenson RS. An assessment of statin safety by muscle experts. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8A):69C–76C.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ward JK, Armitage G. Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(8):685–99.CrossRefPubMed Ward JK, Armitage G. Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(8):685–99.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Hunsel F, Harmark L, Pal S, Olsson S, van Grootheest K. Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey. Drug Saf. 2012;35(1):45–60.CrossRefPubMed van Hunsel F, Harmark L, Pal S, Olsson S, van Grootheest K. Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey. Drug Saf. 2012;35(1):45–60.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Inch J, Watson MC, Anakwe-Umeh S. Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2012;35(10):807–18.CrossRefPubMed Inch J, Watson MC, Anakwe-Umeh S. Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2012;35(10):807–18.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Krska J, Anderson C, Murphy E, Avery AJ. How patient reporters identify adverse drug reactions: a qualitative study of reporting via the UK yellow card scheme. Drug Saf. 2011;34(5):429–36.CrossRefPubMed Krska J, Anderson C, Murphy E, Avery AJ. How patient reporters identify adverse drug reactions: a qualitative study of reporting via the UK yellow card scheme. Drug Saf. 2011;34(5):429–36.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jarernsiripornkul N, Kakaew W, Loalukkana W, Krska J. Adverse drug reaction monitoring: comparing doctor and patient reporting for new drugs. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(3):240–5.CrossRefPubMed Jarernsiripornkul N, Kakaew W, Loalukkana W, Krska J. Adverse drug reaction monitoring: comparing doctor and patient reporting for new drugs. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(3):240–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jarernsiripornkul N, Chaisrisawadsuk S, Chaiyakum A, Krska J. Patient self-reporting of potential adverse drug reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Thailand. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(5):559–64.CrossRefPubMed Jarernsiripornkul N, Chaisrisawadsuk S, Chaiyakum A, Krska J. Patient self-reporting of potential adverse drug reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Thailand. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(5):559–64.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jarernsiripornkul N, Senacom P, Uchaipichat V, Chaipichit N, Krska J. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions to antiepileptic drugs: factors affecting attribution accuracy. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(1):102–6.CrossRefPubMed Jarernsiripornkul N, Senacom P, Uchaipichat V, Chaipichit N, Krska J. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions to antiepileptic drugs: factors affecting attribution accuracy. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(1):102–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Boonmuang P, Nathisuwan S, Chaiyakunapruk N, Suwankesawong W, Pokhagul P, Teerawattanapong N, Supsongserm P. Characterization of statin-associated myopathy case reports in thailand using the health product vigilance center database. Drug Saf. 2013;36(9):779–87.CrossRef Boonmuang P, Nathisuwan S, Chaiyakunapruk N, Suwankesawong W, Pokhagul P, Teerawattanapong N, Supsongserm P. Characterization of statin-associated myopathy case reports in thailand using the health product vigilance center database. Drug Saf. 2013;36(9):779–87.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Golomb BA, McGraw JJ, Evans MA, Dimsdale JE. Physician response to patient reports of adverse drug effects: implications for patient-targeted adverse effect surveillance. Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):669–75.CrossRefPubMed Golomb BA, McGraw JJ, Evans MA, Dimsdale JE. Physician response to patient reports of adverse drug effects: implications for patient-targeted adverse effect surveillance. Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):669–75.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jarernsiripornkul N, Krska J, Capps PA, Richards RM, Lee A. Patient reporting of potential adverse drug reactions: a methodological study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53(3):318–25.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Jarernsiripornkul N, Krska J, Capps PA, Richards RM, Lee A. Patient reporting of potential adverse drug reactions: a methodological study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53(3):318–25.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lacy CF. American Pharmacists Association. Drug information handbook: a comprehensive resource for all clinicians and healthcare professionals. 20th edn. Lexi-Comp, Ohio 2011–2012. ISBN: 978-1-59195-292-3. Lacy CF. American Pharmacists Association. Drug information handbook: a comprehensive resource for all clinicians and healthcare professionals. 20th edn. Lexi-Comp, Ohio 2011–2012. ISBN: 978-1-59195-292-3.
23.
go back to reference Harris LJ, Thapa R, Brown M, Pabbathi S, Childress RD, Heimberg M, Braden R, Elam MB. Clinical and laboratory phenotype of patients experiencing statin intolerance attributable to myalgia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5(4):299–307.CrossRefPubMed Harris LJ, Thapa R, Brown M, Pabbathi S, Childress RD, Heimberg M, Braden R, Elam MB. Clinical and laboratory phenotype of patients experiencing statin intolerance attributable to myalgia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5(4):299–307.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Mashayekhi SO, Ghandforoush-Sattari M, Baghdadchi ME, Kheyri M. Patients’ report of statins use and side-effects in a sample of hospitalized cardiac patients in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2011;17(5):460–4.PubMed Mashayekhi SO, Ghandforoush-Sattari M, Baghdadchi ME, Kheyri M. Patients’ report of statins use and side-effects in a sample of hospitalized cardiac patients in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2011;17(5):460–4.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Bent S, Padula A, Avins AL. Brief communication: better ways to question patients about adverse medical events: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(4):257–61.CrossRefPubMed Bent S, Padula A, Avins AL. Brief communication: better ways to question patients about adverse medical events: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(4):257–61.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference van Hunsel F, Passier A, van Grootheest K. Comparing patients’ and healthcare professionals’ ADR reports after media attention: the broadcast of a Dutch television programme about the benefits and risks of statins as an example. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(5):558–64.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed van Hunsel F, Passier A, van Grootheest K. Comparing patients’ and healthcare professionals’ ADR reports after media attention: the broadcast of a Dutch television programme about the benefits and risks of statins as an example. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(5):558–64.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
28.
go back to reference Law M, Rudnicka AR. Statin safety: a systematic review. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8, Suppl 1):S52–60.CrossRef Law M, Rudnicka AR. Statin safety: a systematic review. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8, Suppl 1):S52–60.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Calderon RM, Cubeddu LX, Goldberg RB, Schiff ER. Statins in the treatment of dyslipidemia in the presence of elevated liver aminotransferase levels: a therapeutic dilemma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(4):349–56.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Calderon RM, Cubeddu LX, Goldberg RB, Schiff ER. Statins in the treatment of dyslipidemia in the presence of elevated liver aminotransferase levels: a therapeutic dilemma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(4):349–56.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lampela P, Hartikainen S, Sulkava R, Huupponen R. Adverse drug effects in elderly people—a disparity between clinical examination and adverse effects self-reported by the patient. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:509–15.CrossRefPubMed Lampela P, Hartikainen S, Sulkava R, Huupponen R. Adverse drug effects in elderly people—a disparity between clinical examination and adverse effects self-reported by the patient. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:509–15.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Cirillo M, Venturini M, Ciccarelli L, Coati F, Bortolami O, Verlato G. Clinician versus nurse symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events during chemotherapy: results of a comparison based on patient’s self-reported questionnaire. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(12):1929–35.CrossRefPubMed Cirillo M, Venturini M, Ciccarelli L, Coati F, Bortolami O, Verlato G. Clinician versus nurse symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events during chemotherapy: results of a comparison based on patient’s self-reported questionnaire. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(12):1929–35.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Thomson J, Wang W, Browning C, Kendig H. Self-reported medication side effects in an older cohort living independently in the community—the Melbourne Longitudinal Study on Healthy Ageing (MELSHA): cross-sectional analysis of prevalence and risk factors. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10(1):37.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Thomson J, Wang W, Browning C, Kendig H. Self-reported medication side effects in an older cohort living independently in the community—the Melbourne Longitudinal Study on Healthy Ageing (MELSHA): cross-sectional analysis of prevalence and risk factors. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10(1):37.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
34.
go back to reference Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health. 2005;27(3):281–91.CrossRef Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health. 2005;27(3):281–91.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Statin adverse effects: patients’ experiences and laboratory monitoring of muscle and liver injuries
Authors
Nataporn Chaipichit
Janet Krska
Thongchai Pratipanawatr
Narumol Jarernsiripornkul
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0068-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2/2015 Go to the issue