Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2009

01-08-2009 | Short Research Report

The A14-scale: development and evaluation of a questionnaire for assessment of adherence and individual barriers

Authors: Susanne Jank, Thilo Bertsche, Dieter Schellberg, Wolfgang Herzog, Walter E. Haefeli

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective To develop a questionnaire (“A14”) for the description of adherence and individual barriers as basis for adherence-enhancing interventions in the clinical and pharmaceutical setting, and to compare it to the validated German MMAS (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale). Method Fourteen questions with a 5-item likert-scale from “never” (4) to “very often” (0) were given to 150 medical inpatients. According to their score, patients were classified into non-adherent (score <50) or adherent (score 50–56). On the dichotomous MMAS, “yes” is scored 0 and “no” 1 point, a total score of 4 indicating adherence. Patients with complete scales were compared with the remaining patients regarding socio-demographic factors. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s Alpha, Spearman correlation, and κ were computed. Results Eighty-three participants completed both scales. Patients with missing values differed significantly regarding age, education, and adherence according to MMAS. Cronbach’s Alpha for A14 was 0.861. MMAS and A14 median total scores were 4 and 52, respectively. About 39.5% of patients were non-adherent as per MMAS compared to 40% as per A14; κ was 0.262 (P = 0.016). The total scores correlated with a Rho-value of 0.43 (P < 0.001). Conclusion The A14-scale showed good internal consistency and a significant correlation with the MMAS suggesting that it merits further investigation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Liebl A, Neiss A, Spannheimer A, Reitberger U, Wagner T, Gortz A. Costs of type 2 diabetes in Germany. Results of the CODE-2 study. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2001;18(126):585–9. doi:10.1055/s-2001-14102.CrossRef Liebl A, Neiss A, Spannheimer A, Reitberger U, Wagner T, Gortz A. Costs of type 2 diabetes in Germany. Results of the CODE-2 study. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2001;18(126):585–9. doi:10.​1055/​s-2001-14102.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Blenkinsopp AP. Extended adherence support by community pharmacists for patients with hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Pharm Pract. 2000;8:165–75.CrossRef Blenkinsopp AP. Extended adherence support by community pharmacists for patients with hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Pharm Pract. 2000;8:165–75.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bortz J, Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2002.CrossRef Bortz J, Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2002.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zumbo BD, Gadermann AM, Zeisser C. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2007;6:21–9.CrossRef Zumbo BD, Gadermann AM, Zeisser C. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2007;6:21–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1991. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1991.
Metadata
Title
The A14-scale: development and evaluation of a questionnaire for assessment of adherence and individual barriers
Authors
Susanne Jank
Thilo Bertsche
Dieter Schellberg
Wolfgang Herzog
Walter E. Haefeli
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-009-9296-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2009 Go to the issue

Editorial

Editorial