Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2/2007

01-04-2007 | Original Paper

Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique

Authors: Jennifer Tio, Adam LaCaze, W. Neil Cottrell

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To establish the range of medicine information sources used by consumers and their perception of the reliability of these, using the repertory grid technique.

Method

Consumers visiting three community pharmacies in Brisbane, Australia, were interviewed using the repertory grid technique. During the interview, consumers were asked to name up to three medicine information sources that they used for a supermarket medicine, an over-the-counter medicine and a prescription medicine. They were then presented with their named information sources in groups of three and asked to discriminate between these in terms of their perceived reliability of the information source. The descriptors used by the consumer to discriminate between the information sources are known as constructs and these were recorded. The consumer was then asked to rate each of their information sources against each generated construct.

Main outcome measure

The range of information sources generated was determined along with the perceived reliability of these from the calculated median score of each information source when rated on each generated construct.

Results

A total of 110 consumers were interviewed and identified 648 information sources that they would use. The most frequent information sources cited by the 110 consumers were their doctor (83%), written information (90%) and the pharmacist (78%). There were a total of 299 constructs generated by 88 of the consumers and these were themed into 16 discrete categories. The most common generated constructs themes were “good knowledge” (15%), “training” (14%) and “trustworthiness” (13%). The consumer perception of their information sources were that the doctor and pharmacist have good knowledge (median score 1) and are trained (median score 1) and were perceived to be trustworthy (median score 3 and 2, respectively).

Conclusion

The repertory grid technique was successful in identifying the information sources consumers accessed to find out about their medicines and in identifying the perception of these sources in terms of their reliability. The repertory grid technique offers a novel method for future research into consumer preferences for different treatment options.
Literature
1.
go back to reference From compliance to concordance. Acheiving shared goals in medicine-taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 1997 From compliance to concordance. Acheiving shared goals in medicine-taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 1997
2.
go back to reference Horne R. Nonadherence to medication: causes and impliation for care. In: Gard P, editor. A behavioural approach to pharmacy practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2000. pp. 111–30. ISBN 0632051388 Horne R. Nonadherence to medication: causes and impliation for care. In: Gard P, editor. A behavioural approach to pharmacy practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2000. pp. 111–30. ISBN 0632051388
3.
4.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:651–61PubMedCrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:651–61PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Montgomery A, Fahey T. How do patients treatment preference compare with those of clinicians? Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i39–43.PubMed Montgomery A, Fahey T. How do patients treatment preference compare with those of clinicians? Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i39–43.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gerrity MS, DeVellis RF, Earp JA. Physicians’ reactions to uncertainty in patient care. A new measure and new insights. Med Care 1990;28(8):724–36.PubMedCrossRef Gerrity MS, DeVellis RF, Earp JA. Physicians’ reactions to uncertainty in patient care. A new measure and new insights. Med Care 1990;28(8):724–36.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cotten S, Gupta S. Characteristics of online and offline helath information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1795–806.PubMedCrossRef Cotten S, Gupta S. Characteristics of online and offline helath information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1795–806.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hardey M. Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociol Health Illn 1999;21(6):820–35.CrossRef Hardey M. Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociol Health Illn 1999;21(6):820–35.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bourke L. Australian rural consumers’ perceptions of health issues. Aust J Rural Health 2001;2001(9):1–6.CrossRef Bourke L. Australian rural consumers’ perceptions of health issues. Aust J Rural Health 2001;2001(9):1–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Newby DA, Hill SR, Barker BJ, Drew AK, Henry DA. Drug information for consumers: should it be disease- or medication-specific? Results of a community survey. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001;25(6):564–70.PubMed Newby DA, Hill SR, Barker BJ, Drew AK, Henry DA. Drug information for consumers: should it be disease- or medication-specific? Results of a community survey. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001;25(6):564–70.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Pennbridge J, Moya R, Rodrigues L. Questionnaire survey of California consumers’ use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet. West J Med 1999;171(5–6):302–5.PubMed Pennbridge J, Moya R, Rodrigues L. Questionnaire survey of California consumers’ use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet. West J Med 1999;171(5–6):302–5.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Sleath B, Wurst K, Lowery T. Drug information sources and antidepressant adherence. Community Ment Health J 2003;39(4):359–68.PubMedCrossRef Sleath B, Wurst K, Lowery T. Drug information sources and antidepressant adherence. Community Ment Health J 2003;39(4):359–68.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stergachis A, Maine LL, Brown L. The 2001 national pharmacy consumer survey. J Am Pharm Assoc 2002;42(4):568–76.CrossRef Stergachis A, Maine LL, Brown L. The 2001 national pharmacy consumer survey. J Am Pharm Assoc 2002;42(4):568–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Trewin V, Veitch GBA. Patient source of drug information and attitudes to their provision: a corticosteriod model. Pharm World Sci 2003;25(5):191–6.PubMedCrossRef Trewin V, Veitch GBA. Patient source of drug information and attitudes to their provision: a corticosteriod model. Pharm World Sci 2003;25(5):191–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, Sesselberg TS, Cantrill JA. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(7):1467–78.PubMedCrossRef Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, Sesselberg TS, Cantrill JA. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(7):1467–78.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brodie M, Foehr U, Rideout V, Baer N, Miller C, Fluornoy R et al. Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Aff 2001;20(1):192–9.CrossRef Brodie M, Foehr U, Rideout V, Baer N, Miller C, Fluornoy R et al. Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Aff 2001;20(1):192–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hotham N. Information on drugs and environmental influences in pregnancy in popular magazines: a critical review. Med J Aust 1995;162:417–20.PubMed Hotham N. Information on drugs and environmental influences in pregnancy in popular magazines: a critical review. Med J Aust 1995;162:417–20.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bernhardt JM, Lariscy RAW, Parrott RL, Silk KJ, Felter EM. Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics. J Health Commun 2002;7(4):325–40.PubMedCrossRef Bernhardt JM, Lariscy RAW, Parrott RL, Silk KJ, Felter EM. Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics. J Health Commun 2002;7(4):325–40.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Makoul G, Arntson P, Schofield T. Health promotion in primary care: physician–patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med 1995;41(9):1241–54.PubMedCrossRef Makoul G, Arntson P, Schofield T. Health promotion in primary care: physician–patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med 1995;41(9):1241–54.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Raynor D, Knapp P. Do patients see, read, and retain the new mandatory medicines information leaflets? Pharm J 2000;264(7083):268–70. Raynor D, Knapp P. Do patients see, read, and retain the new mandatory medicines information leaflets? Pharm J 2000;264(7083):268–70.
21.
go back to reference Raynor DJK, Savage I, Knapp P, Henley J. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs. Patient Educ Couns 2004;53(2):167–74.PubMedCrossRef Raynor DJK, Savage I, Knapp P, Henley J. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs. Patient Educ Couns 2004;53(2):167–74.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lloyd A. The extenet of patients understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i14-8.PubMed Lloyd A. The extenet of patients understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i14-8.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Frewer L, Salter B, Lambert N. Understanding patients preferences for treatment the need for innovative methodologies. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i50–4.PubMed Frewer L, Salter B, Lambert N. Understanding patients preferences for treatment the need for innovative methodologies. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i50–4.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kelly G. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Ruoteledge; 1991 (Previously Norton; 1955). ISBN 0415037972 Kelly G. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Ruoteledge; 1991 (Previously Norton; 1955). ISBN 0415037972
25.
go back to reference Frewer L, Howard C, Shepherd R. Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics. Sci Technol Human Values 1997;22(1):98–124.PubMed Frewer L, Howard C, Shepherd R. Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics. Sci Technol Human Values 1997;22(1):98–124.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Frewer L, Howard C, Hedderley D, Shepherd R. What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Risk Anal 1996;16(4):473–86PubMedCrossRef Frewer L, Howard C, Hedderley D, Shepherd R. What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Risk Anal 1996;16(4):473–86PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lewith G, Chan J. An exploratory qualitative study to investigate how patients evaluate complementary and conventional medicine. Complement Ther Med 2002;10:69–77PubMedCrossRef Lewith G, Chan J. An exploratory qualitative study to investigate how patients evaluate complementary and conventional medicine. Complement Ther Med 2002;10:69–77PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rowe G, Lambert N, Bowling A, Ebrahim S, Wakeling I, Thomson R. Assessing patients’ preferences for treatments for angina using a modified repertory grid method. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(11):2585–95.PubMedCrossRef Rowe G, Lambert N, Bowling A, Ebrahim S, Wakeling I, Thomson R. Assessing patients’ preferences for treatments for angina using a modified repertory grid method. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(11):2585–95.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fransella F, Bell R, Bannister D. A manual for repertory grid technique. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2004. ISBN 0470854901 Fransella F, Bell R, Bannister D. A manual for repertory grid technique. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2004. ISBN 0470854901
30.
go back to reference Jankowicz D. The easy guide to repertory grids. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. ISBN 0470854049 Jankowicz D. The easy guide to repertory grids. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. ISBN 0470854049
31.
go back to reference Fox S, Rainie L, Horrigan J, Lenhart A, Spooner T, Burke M, et al. The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves [Internet]. The Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2000. In; 2000. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=26. Accessed 1 Jul 2003 Fox S, Rainie L, Horrigan J, Lenhart A, Spooner T, Burke M, et al. The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves [Internet]. The Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2000. In; 2000. Available at http://​www.​pewinternet.​org/​reports/​toc.​asp?​Report=​26.​ Accessed 1 Jul 2003
32.
go back to reference Bunn MD. Consumer perceptions of medical information sources: an application of multidimensional scaling. Health Mark Q 1993;10(3–4):83–104PubMedCrossRef Bunn MD. Consumer perceptions of medical information sources: an application of multidimensional scaling. Health Mark Q 1993;10(3–4):83–104PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique
Authors
Jennifer Tio
Adam LaCaze
W. Neil Cottrell
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-006-9076-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2/2007 Go to the issue