Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2020

01-07-2020 | Glioblastoma | Clinical Study

Early imaging marker of progressing glioblastoma: a window of opportunity

Authors: Na Tosha N. Gatson, Shane P. Bross, Yazmin Odia, Gino J. Mongelluzzo, Yirui Hu, Laura Lockard, Jesse J. Manikowski, Anand Mahadevan, Syed A. J. Kazmi, Michel Lacroix, Andrew R. Conger, Joseph Vadakara, Lakshmi Nayak, T. Linda Chi, Minesh P. Mehta, Vinay K. Puduvalli

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Therapeutic intervention at glioblastoma (GBM) progression, as defined by current assessment criteria, is arguably too late as second-line therapies fail to extend survival. Still, most GBM trials target recurrent disease. We propose integration of a novel imaging biomarker to more confidently and promptly define progression and propose a critical timepoint for earlier intervention to extend therapeutic exposure.

Methods

A retrospective review of 609 GBM patients between 2006 and 2019 yielded 135 meeting resection, clinical, and imaging inclusion criteria. We qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed 2000+ sequential brain MRIs (initial diagnosis to first progression) for development of T2 FLAIR signal intensity (SI) within the resection cavity (RC) compared to the ventricles (V) for quantitative inter-image normalization. PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves stratified by SI. Specificity and sensitivity were determined using a 2 × 2 table and pathology confirmation at progression. Multivariate analysis evaluated SI effect on the hazard rate for death after adjusting for established prognostic covariates. Recursive partitioning determined successive quantifiers and cutoffs associated with outcomes. Neurological deficits correlated with SI.

Results

Seventy-five percent of patients developed SI on average 3.4 months before RANO-assessed progression with 84% sensitivity. SI-positivity portended neurological decline and significantly poorer outcomes for PFS (median, 10 vs. 15 months) and OS (median, 20 vs. 29 months) compared to SI-negative. RC/V ratio ≥ 4 was the most significant prognostic indicator of death.

Conclusion

Implications of these data are far-reaching, potentially shifting paradigms for glioma treatment response assessment, altering timepoints for salvage therapeutic intervention, and reshaping glioma clinical trial design.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD et al (2013) Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4085–4091PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD et al (2013) Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4085–4091PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA et al (2012) New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC brain tumor group phase I and II clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 48(8):1176–1184PubMedCrossRef Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA et al (2012) New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC brain tumor group phase I and II clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 48(8):1176–1184PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ortega A, Sarmiento JM, Ly D et al (2016) Multiple resections and survival of recurrent glioblastoma patients in the temozolomide era. J Clin Neurosci 24:105–111PubMedCrossRef Ortega A, Sarmiento JM, Ly D et al (2016) Multiple resections and survival of recurrent glioblastoma patients in the temozolomide era. J Clin Neurosci 24:105–111PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wann A, Tully PA, Barnes EH et al (2018) Outcomes after second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective case–control study. J Neuro-Oncol 137(2):409–415CrossRef Wann A, Tully PA, Barnes EH et al (2018) Outcomes after second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective case–control study. J Neuro-Oncol 137(2):409–415CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ et al (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2572–2578PubMed Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ et al (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2572–2578PubMed
8.
go back to reference Tipping M, Eickhoff J, Robins HI (2017) Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: an analysis of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 44:101–106PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tipping M, Eickhoff J, Robins HI (2017) Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: an analysis of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 44:101–106PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weller M, van den Bent M, Hopkins K et al (2014) EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma. Lancet Oncol 15(9):e395–403PubMedCrossRef Weller M, van den Bent M, Hopkins K et al (2014) EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma. Lancet Oncol 15(9):e395–403PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nayak L, DeAngelis LM, Brandes AA et al (2017) The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale: a tool to assess neurologic function for integration into the response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria. Neuro-Oncology 19(5):625–635PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nayak L, DeAngelis LM, Brandes AA et al (2017) The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale: a tool to assess neurologic function for integration into the response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria. Neuro-Oncology 19(5):625–635PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marcucci F, Corti A (2012) How to improve exposure of tumor cells to drugs: promoter drugs increase tumor uptake and penetration of effector drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64(1):53–68PubMedCrossRef Marcucci F, Corti A (2012) How to improve exposure of tumor cells to drugs: promoter drugs increase tumor uptake and penetration of effector drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64(1):53–68PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Reardon DA, Rich JN, Friedman HS, Bigner DD (2006) Recent advances in the treatment of malignant astrocytoma. J Clin Oncol 24(8):1253–1265PubMedCrossRef Reardon DA, Rich JN, Friedman HS, Bigner DD (2006) Recent advances in the treatment of malignant astrocytoma. J Clin Oncol 24(8):1253–1265PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference de Souza CF, Sabedot TS, Malta TM et al (2018) A distinct DNA methylation shift in a subset of glioma CpG island methylator phenotypes during tumor recurrence. Cell Rep 23(2):637–651PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral de Souza CF, Sabedot TS, Malta TM et al (2018) A distinct DNA methylation shift in a subset of glioma CpG island methylator phenotypes during tumor recurrence. Cell Rep 23(2):637–651PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
15.
16.
go back to reference Kim EL, Sorokin M, Kantelhardt SR et al (2020) Intratumoral heterogeneity and longitudinal changes in gene expression predict differential drug sensitivity in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma. Cancers 12(2):E520PubMedCrossRef Kim EL, Sorokin M, Kantelhardt SR et al (2020) Intratumoral heterogeneity and longitudinal changes in gene expression predict differential drug sensitivity in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma. Cancers 12(2):E520PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jakola AS, Myrmel KS, Kloster R et al (2012) Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. JAMA 308(18):1881–1888PubMedCrossRef Jakola AS, Myrmel KS, Kloster R et al (2012) Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. JAMA 308(18):1881–1888PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chan TS, Hsu CC, Pai VC et al (2016) Metronomic chemotherapy prevents therapy-induced stromal activation and induction of tumor-initiating cells. J Exp Med 213(13):2967–2988PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chan TS, Hsu CC, Pai VC et al (2016) Metronomic chemotherapy prevents therapy-induced stromal activation and induction of tumor-initiating cells. J Exp Med 213(13):2967–2988PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M et al (1999) Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(6):523–528PubMedCrossRef James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M et al (1999) Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(6):523–528PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8(7):1277–1280PubMedCrossRef Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8(7):1277–1280PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1963–1972PubMedCrossRef Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1963–1972PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Galanis E, Buckner JC, Maurer MJ et al (2006) Validation of neuroradiologic response assessment in gliomas: measurement by RECIST, two-dimensional, computer-assisted tumor area, and computer-assisted tumor volume methods. Neuro-oncology 8(2):156–165PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Galanis E, Buckner JC, Maurer MJ et al (2006) Validation of neuroradiologic response assessment in gliomas: measurement by RECIST, two-dimensional, computer-assisted tumor area, and computer-assisted tumor volume methods. Neuro-oncology 8(2):156–165PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ellingson BM, Bendszus M, Boxerman J et al (2015) Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. Neuro-oncology 17(9):1188–1198PubMedPubMedCentral Ellingson BM, Bendszus M, Boxerman J et al (2015) Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. Neuro-oncology 17(9):1188–1198PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Hamilton JD, Lin J, Ison C et al (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion processing for neuroradiologists: model-dependent analysis may not be necessary for determining recurrent high-grade glioma versus treatment effect. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(4):686–693PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Hamilton JD, Lin J, Ison C et al (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion processing for neuroradiologists: model-dependent analysis may not be necessary for determining recurrent high-grade glioma versus treatment effect. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(4):686–693PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference O'Brien BJ, Colen RR (2014) Post-treatment imaging changes in primary brain tumors. Curr Oncol Rep 16(8):397PubMedCrossRef O'Brien BJ, Colen RR (2014) Post-treatment imaging changes in primary brain tumors. Curr Oncol Rep 16(8):397PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gallego Perez-Larraya J, Lahutte M, Petrirena G et al (2012) Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria. Neuro-oncology 14(5):667–673PubMedCrossRef Gallego Perez-Larraya J, Lahutte M, Petrirena G et al (2012) Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria. Neuro-oncology 14(5):667–673PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Winterstein M, Munter MW, Burkholder I, Essig M, Kauczor HU, Weber MA (2010) Partially resected gliomas: diagnostic performance of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging for detection of progression. Radiology 254(3):907–916PubMedCrossRef Winterstein M, Munter MW, Burkholder I, Essig M, Kauczor HU, Weber MA (2010) Partially resected gliomas: diagnostic performance of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging for detection of progression. Radiology 254(3):907–916PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ito-Yamashita T, Nakasu Y, Mitsuya K, Mizokami Y, Namba H (2013) Detection of tumor progression by signal intensity increase on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance images in the resection cavity of high-grade gliomas. Neurol Med Chir 53(7):496–500CrossRef Ito-Yamashita T, Nakasu Y, Mitsuya K, Mizokami Y, Namba H (2013) Detection of tumor progression by signal intensity increase on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance images in the resection cavity of high-grade gliomas. Neurol Med Chir 53(7):496–500CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sarbu N, Oleaga L, Valduvieco I, Pujol T, Berenguer J (2016) Increased signal intensity in FLAIR sequences in the resection cavity can predict progression and progression-free survival in gliomas. Neurocirugia 27(6):269–276PubMedCrossRef Sarbu N, Oleaga L, Valduvieco I, Pujol T, Berenguer J (2016) Increased signal intensity in FLAIR sequences in the resection cavity can predict progression and progression-free survival in gliomas. Neurocirugia 27(6):269–276PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bette S, Gempt J, Huber T et al (2017) FLAIR signal increase of the fluid within the resection cavity after glioma surgery: generally valid as early recurrence marker? J Neurosurg 127:417–425PubMedCrossRef Bette S, Gempt J, Huber T et al (2017) FLAIR signal increase of the fluid within the resection cavity after glioma surgery: generally valid as early recurrence marker? J Neurosurg 127:417–425PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sharma M, Juthani RG, Vogelbaum MA (2017) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade glioma: beyond the MacDonald criteria. Chin Clin Oncol 6(4):37PubMedCrossRef Sharma M, Juthani RG, Vogelbaum MA (2017) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade glioma: beyond the MacDonald criteria. Chin Clin Oncol 6(4):37PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
go back to reference Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G et al (2016) The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820PubMedCrossRef Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G et al (2016) The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cihoric N, Tsikkinis A, Minniti G et al (2017) Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for glioblastoma: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. Radiat Oncol 12:1PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cihoric N, Tsikkinis A, Minniti G et al (2017) Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for glioblastoma: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. Radiat Oncol 12:1PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Reardon DA, Ballman KV, Buckner JC, Chang SM, Ellingson BM (2014) Impact of imaging measurements on response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neuro-Oncology 16:724–735CrossRef Reardon DA, Ballman KV, Buckner JC, Chang SM, Ellingson BM (2014) Impact of imaging measurements on response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neuro-Oncology 16:724–735CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Chukwueke UN, Wen PY (2019) Use of the response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice. CNS Oncol 8(1):28CrossRef Chukwueke UN, Wen PY (2019) Use of the response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice. CNS Oncol 8(1):28CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Essig M, Metzner R, Bonsanto M et al (2001) Postoperative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging of cerebral gliomas: initial results. Eur Radiol 11:2004–2010PubMedCrossRef Essig M, Metzner R, Bonsanto M et al (2001) Postoperative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging of cerebral gliomas: initial results. Eur Radiol 11:2004–2010PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Gerson SL (2004) MGMT: its role in cancer aetiology and cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 4(4):296–307PubMedCrossRef Gerson SL (2004) MGMT: its role in cancer aetiology and cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 4(4):296–307PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sharma S, Salehi F, Scheithauer BW, Rotondo F, Syro LV, Kovacs K (2009) Role of MGMT in tumor development, progression, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Anticancer Res 29(10):3759–3768PubMed Sharma S, Salehi F, Scheithauer BW, Rotondo F, Syro LV, Kovacs K (2009) Role of MGMT in tumor development, progression, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Anticancer Res 29(10):3759–3768PubMed
43.
go back to reference Bell EH, Zhang P, Fisher BJ et al (2018) Association of MGMT promoter methylation status with survival outcomes in patients with high-risk glioma treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide: an analysis from the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0424 trial. JAMA Oncol 4(10):1405–1409PubMedCrossRef Bell EH, Zhang P, Fisher BJ et al (2018) Association of MGMT promoter methylation status with survival outcomes in patients with high-risk glioma treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide: an analysis from the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0424 trial. JAMA Oncol 4(10):1405–1409PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sun M, Oh T, Ivan ME (2015) Survival impact of time to initiation of chemoradiotherapy after resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurosurg 122:1144–1150PubMedCrossRef Sun M, Oh T, Ivan ME (2015) Survival impact of time to initiation of chemoradiotherapy after resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurosurg 122:1144–1150PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Warren KT, Liu L, Liu Y, Milano MT, Walter KA (2019) The impact of timing of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with high-grade glioma in the era of the Stupp protocol. Front Oncol 9:18CrossRef Warren KT, Liu L, Liu Y, Milano MT, Walter KA (2019) The impact of timing of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with high-grade glioma in the era of the Stupp protocol. Front Oncol 9:18CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Perry JR, Bélanger K, Mason WP et al (2010) Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol 28(12):2051–2057PubMedCrossRef Perry JR, Bélanger K, Mason WP et al (2010) Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol 28(12):2051–2057PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Omuro A, Chan TA, Abrey LE et al (2013) Phase II trial of continuous low-dose temozolomide for patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Neuro-Oncology 15(2):242–250PubMedCrossRef Omuro A, Chan TA, Abrey LE et al (2013) Phase II trial of continuous low-dose temozolomide for patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Neuro-Oncology 15(2):242–250PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Lee J, Park SH, Kim YZ (2018) Prognostic evaluation of neurological assessment of the neuro-oncology scale in glioblastoma patients. Brain Tumor Res Treat 6(1):22–30PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lee J, Park SH, Kim YZ (2018) Prognostic evaluation of neurological assessment of the neuro-oncology scale in glioblastoma patients. Brain Tumor Res Treat 6(1):22–30PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Armstrong TS, Mendoza T, Gning I et al (2006) Validation of the MD anderson symptom inventory brain tumor module (MDASi-BT). J Neurooncol 80(1):27–35PubMedCrossRef Armstrong TS, Mendoza T, Gning I et al (2006) Validation of the MD anderson symptom inventory brain tumor module (MDASi-BT). J Neurooncol 80(1):27–35PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early imaging marker of progressing glioblastoma: a window of opportunity
Authors
Na Tosha N. Gatson
Shane P. Bross
Yazmin Odia
Gino J. Mongelluzzo
Yirui Hu
Laura Lockard
Jesse J. Manikowski
Anand Mahadevan
Syed A. J. Kazmi
Michel Lacroix
Andrew R. Conger
Joseph Vadakara
Lakshmi Nayak
T. Linda Chi
Minesh P. Mehta
Vinay K. Puduvalli
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03565-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2020 Go to the issue