Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2017

01-06-2017 | Clinical Study

Patterns of care and outcomes of multi-agent versus single-agent chemotherapy as part of multimodal management of low grade glioma

Authors: Waqar Haque, Vivek Verma, E. Brian Butler, Bin S. Teh

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

For high-risk low-grade gliomas (LGGs), adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with procarbazine/lomustine/vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy increases overall survival (OS) over RT alone. However, in practice, temozolomide (TMZ) is often used instead of PCV. Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we provide the first investigation of practice patterns and outcomes of chemoradiotherapy with single-agent chemotherapy (SAC, analogous to TMZ) or multi-agent chemotherapy (MAC, analogous to PCV) for LGG. Patients with high-risk Grade II LGGs were queried in the NCDB. Inclusion was limited to patients treated with definitive RT and chemotherapy. Patients were divided into cohorts receiving SAC or MAC. Kaplan–Meier analysis compared overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards models determined variables independently associated with OS. Of 1029 patients, 989 (96.1%) received SAC, while 40 (3.9%) received MAC. Patients treated more recently (2010–2012) were less likely to receive MAC (p = 0.029). No differences in median OS were observed between patients treated with MAC and SAC (45.3 vs. 59.2 months, p = 0.861). Independent predictors of worse OS included age >40, high Charlson–Deyo index, other governmental/unrecorded insurance status, biopsy only, astrocytoma histology, Western geographical region, and higher income. Substuting MAC with SAC had no impact on OS (p = 0.804). There is a significantly greater utilization of SAC compared to MAC in the US. There were no differences in OS between patients receiving SAC and MAC, nor did this factor impact OS on multivariate analysis, suggesting that the practice of substituting MAC with SAC for management of LGG may not adversely affect outcome.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
3.
4.
go back to reference Rinne ML, Wen PY (2015) Treating anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and WHO grade 2 gliomas: PCV or temozlomide? The case for temozolomide. Oncology 29:265–275PubMed Rinne ML, Wen PY (2015) Treating anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and WHO grade 2 gliomas: PCV or temozlomide? The case for temozolomide. Oncology 29:265–275PubMed
5.
go back to reference van den Bent MJ (2015) Chemotherapy for low-grade glioma: when, for whom, which regimen? Curr Opin Neurol 28:633–638CrossRefPubMed van den Bent MJ (2015) Chemotherapy for low-grade glioma: when, for whom, which regimen? Curr Opin Neurol 28:633–638CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference O’Reilly SM, Newlands ES, Glaser MG et al (1993) Temozolomide: a new oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent with promising activity against primary brain tumors. Eur J Cancer 29A:940–942CrossRefPubMed O’Reilly SM, Newlands ES, Glaser MG et al (1993) Temozolomide: a new oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent with promising activity against primary brain tumors. Eur J Cancer 29A:940–942CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomized phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomized phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Brada M, Stenning S, Gabe R et al (2010) Temozolomide versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in recurrent high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 28:4601–4608CrossRefPubMed Brada M, Stenning S, Gabe R et al (2010) Temozolomide versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in recurrent high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 28:4601–4608CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wick W, Hartmann C, Engel C et al (2009) NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine or temozolomide. J Clin Oncol 27:5874–5880CrossRefPubMed Wick W, Hartmann C, Engel C et al (2009) NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine or temozolomide. J Clin Oncol 27:5874–5880CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wick W, Roth P, Hartmann C et al (2016) Long-term analysis of the NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 18:1529–1537PubMed Wick W, Roth P, Hartmann C et al (2016) Long-term analysis of the NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 18:1529–1537PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ziu M, Kalkanis SN, Gilbert M et al (2015) The role of initial chemotherapy for the treatment of adults with diffuse low grade glioma: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. J Neurooncol 125:585–607CrossRefPubMed Ziu M, Kalkanis SN, Gilbert M et al (2015) The role of initial chemotherapy for the treatment of adults with diffuse low grade glioma: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. J Neurooncol 125:585–607CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Field KM, Rosenthal MA, Khasraw M et al (2016) Evolving management of low grade glioma: no consensus amongst treating clinicians. J Clin Neurosci 23:81–87CrossRefPubMed Field KM, Rosenthal MA, Khasraw M et al (2016) Evolving management of low grade glioma: no consensus amongst treating clinicians. J Clin Neurosci 23:81–87CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fisher BJ, Hu C, Macdonald DR et al (2015) Phase 2 study of temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy for high-risk low-grade gliomas: preliminary results of radiation therapy oncology group 0424. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:497–504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fisher BJ, Hu C, Macdonald DR et al (2015) Phase 2 study of temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy for high-risk low-grade gliomas: preliminary results of radiation therapy oncology group 0424. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:497–504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference van den Bent MJ, Chinot O, Boogerd W et al (2003) Second-line chemotherapy with temozolomide in recurrent oligodendroglioma after PCV (procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine) chemotherapy: EORTC Brain Tumor Group phase II study 26972. Ann Oncol 14:599–602CrossRefPubMed van den Bent MJ, Chinot O, Boogerd W et al (2003) Second-line chemotherapy with temozolomide in recurrent oligodendroglioma after PCV (procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine) chemotherapy: EORTC Brain Tumor Group phase II study 26972. Ann Oncol 14:599–602CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pace A, Vidiri A, Galie E et al (2003) Temozolomide chemotherapy for progressive low-grade glioma: clinical benefits and radiological response. Ann Oncol 14:1722–1726CrossRefPubMed Pace A, Vidiri A, Galie E et al (2003) Temozolomide chemotherapy for progressive low-grade glioma: clinical benefits and radiological response. Ann Oncol 14:1722–1726CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hoang-Xuan K, Capelle L, Kujas M et al (2004) Temozolomide as initial treatment for adults with low-grade oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas and correlation with chromosome 1p deletions. J Clin Oncol 22:3133–3138CrossRefPubMed Hoang-Xuan K, Capelle L, Kujas M et al (2004) Temozolomide as initial treatment for adults with low-grade oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas and correlation with chromosome 1p deletions. J Clin Oncol 22:3133–3138CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kaloshi G, Benouaich-Amiel A, Diakite F et al (2007) Temozolomide for low-grade gliomas: predictive impact of 1p/19q loss on response and outcome. Neurology 68:1831–1836CrossRefPubMed Kaloshi G, Benouaich-Amiel A, Diakite F et al (2007) Temozolomide for low-grade gliomas: predictive impact of 1p/19q loss on response and outcome. Neurology 68:1831–1836CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wahl M, Phillips JJ, Molinaro AM et al (2016) Chemotherapy for adult low-grade gliomas: clinical outcomes by molecular subtype in a phase II study of adjuvant temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 19:242–251 Wahl M, Phillips JJ, Molinaro AM et al (2016) Chemotherapy for adult low-grade gliomas: clinical outcomes by molecular subtype in a phase II study of adjuvant temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 19:242–251
21.
go back to reference Baumert BG, Hegi ME, van den Bent et al (2016) Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma (EORTC 22033-26033): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study. Lancet Oncol 17:1521–1532CrossRefPubMed Baumert BG, Hegi ME, van den Bent et al (2016) Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma (EORTC 22033-26033): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study. Lancet Oncol 17:1521–1532CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kesari S, Schiff D, Drappatz J et al (2009) Phase II study of protracted daily temozolomide for low-grade gliomas in adults. Clin Cancer Res 15:330–337CrossRefPubMed Kesari S, Schiff D, Drappatz J et al (2009) Phase II study of protracted daily temozolomide for low-grade gliomas in adults. Clin Cancer Res 15:330–337CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Quinn J, Reardon D, Friedman A et al (2003) Phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with progressive low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 21:646–651CrossRefPubMed Quinn J, Reardon D, Friedman A et al (2003) Phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with progressive low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 21:646–651CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bilimoria K, Stewart A, Winchester D, Ko C (2008) The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 15:683–690CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria K, Stewart A, Winchester D, Ko C (2008) The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 15:683–690CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Verma V, Mehta MP (2016) Clinical ramifications of “genomic staging” of low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 129:195–199CrossRefPubMed Verma V, Mehta MP (2016) Clinical ramifications of “genomic staging” of low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 129:195–199CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM et al (2015) Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors. N Engl J Med 372:2499–2508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM et al (2015) Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors. N Engl J Med 372:2499–2508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Patterns of care and outcomes of multi-agent versus single-agent chemotherapy as part of multimodal management of low grade glioma
Authors
Waqar Haque
Vivek Verma
E. Brian Butler
Bin S. Teh
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2443-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2017 Go to the issue