Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2016

01-05-2016 | Clinical Study

Recurrent glioblastoma: who receives tumor specific treatment and how often?

Authors: Rieke Steffens, Sabine Semrau, Godehard Lahmer, Florian Putz, Sebastian Lettmaier, Ilker Eyüpoglu, Michael Buchfelder, Rainer Fietkau

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The recurrence of glioblastoma (rGBM) is inevitable and often short-term. Therefore, information on the prognosis and effectiveness of tumor-specific versus purely palliative approaches should be more in-depth than a mere list of available treatment options for patients in this situation. However, follow-up data on the course of the disease in unselected patient populations after completion of primary treatment are scarce. This single-center analysis investigated the rate and number of glioblastoma recurrences after initial radiotherapy in 189 consecutive GM patients, focusing on the incidence of early death and the frequency of tumor-specific treatment (TST) versus best-supportive care (BSC) as well as the outcomes for the different approaches. In 61 % of initial population first recurrence (rGBM) could be determined by histology or imaging. 47 % received TST. 58 % of the patients with rGBM and TST were diagnosed with a second recurrence. Up to five recurrences were treated. 35–45 % of patients died before undergoing imaging studies to confirm the next recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified male sex and KPS score as independent factors (p < 0.01) for the choice of TST over BSC. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of first recurrence was 267 days in the TST group versus 65 days in patients receiving BSC (p < 0.0001). Nearly half of all rGBM patients received second-line TST, but a remarkably high proportion died early. Gender and KPS played a role in the choice of TST over BSC for recurrence treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro Oncol 14(Suppl 5):1–49CrossRef Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro Oncol 14(Suppl 5):1–49CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401CrossRefPubMed Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Walker MD, Strike TA, Sheline GE (1979) An analysis of dose-effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5:1725–1731CrossRefPubMed Walker MD, Strike TA, Sheline GE (1979) An analysis of dose-effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5:1725–1731CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B et al (2015) MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res 21:2057–2064CrossRefPubMed Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B et al (2015) MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res 21:2057–2064CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Combs SE, Edler L, Rausch R et al (2013) Generation and validation of a prognostic score to predict outcome after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. Acta Oncol 52:147–152CrossRefPubMed Combs SE, Edler L, Rausch R et al (2013) Generation and validation of a prognostic score to predict outcome after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. Acta Oncol 52:147–152CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:943–953CrossRefPubMed Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:943–953CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fokas E, Wacker U, Gross MW et al (2009) Hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation of recurrent glioblastomas: a beneficial treatment option after high-dose radiotherapy? Strahlenther Onkol 185:235–240CrossRefPubMed Fokas E, Wacker U, Gross MW et al (2009) Hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation of recurrent glioblastomas: a beneficial treatment option after high-dose radiotherapy? Strahlenther Onkol 185:235–240CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Levin VA, Mendelssohn ND, Chan J et al (2015) Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 122:145–150CrossRefPubMed Levin VA, Mendelssohn ND, Chan J et al (2015) Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 122:145–150CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fietkau R, Putz F, Lahmer G et al (2013) Can MGMT promoter methylation status be used as a prognostic and predictive marker for glioblastoma multiforme at the present time? A word of caution. Strahlenther Onkol 189:993–995CrossRefPubMed Fietkau R, Putz F, Lahmer G et al (2013) Can MGMT promoter methylation status be used as a prognostic and predictive marker for glioblastoma multiforme at the present time? A word of caution. Strahlenther Onkol 189:993–995CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA et al (2012) New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC Brain Tumour Group phase I and II clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 48:1176–1184CrossRefPubMed Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA et al (2012) New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC Brain Tumour Group phase I and II clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 48:1176–1184CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Balducci M, Diletto B, Chiesa S et al (2014) Low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma: final report of a pilot study. Strahlenther Onkol 190:370–376CrossRefPubMed Balducci M, Diletto B, Chiesa S et al (2014) Low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma: final report of a pilot study. Strahlenther Onkol 190:370–376CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972CrossRefPubMed Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brodbelt A, Greenberg D, Winters T, Williams M, Vernon S, Collins VP, National Cancer Information Network Brain Tumour G (2015) Glioblastoma in England: 2007–2011. Eur J Cancer 51:533–542CrossRefPubMed Brodbelt A, Greenberg D, Winters T, Williams M, Vernon S, Collins VP, National Cancer Information Network Brain Tumour G (2015) Glioblastoma in England: 2007–2011. Eur J Cancer 51:533–542CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ho VK, Reijneveld JC, Enting RH, Bienfait HP, Robe P, Baumert BG, Visser O, Dutch Society for N-O (2014) Changing incidence and improved survival of gliomas. Eur J Cancer 50:2309–2318CrossRefPubMed Ho VK, Reijneveld JC, Enting RH, Bienfait HP, Robe P, Baumert BG, Visser O, Dutch Society for N-O (2014) Changing incidence and improved survival of gliomas. Eur J Cancer 50:2309–2318CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Barone DG, Lawrie TA, Hart MG (2014) Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28:1 Barone DG, Lawrie TA, Hart MG (2014) Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28:1
19.
go back to reference Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim HR, Kim KH, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Nam DH, Lim DH, Lee JI (2015) Outcome of salvage treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 22:468–473CrossRefPubMed Kim HR, Kim KH, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Nam DH, Lim DH, Lee JI (2015) Outcome of salvage treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 22:468–473CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Krex D, Klink B, Hartmann C et al (2007) Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain 130:2596–2606CrossRefPubMed Krex D, Klink B, Hartmann C et al (2007) Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain 130:2596–2606CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Su D, Stimpson JP, Wilson FA (2015) Racial disparities in mortality among middle-aged and older men: does marriage matter? Am J Mens Health 9:289–300CrossRefPubMed Su D, Stimpson JP, Wilson FA (2015) Racial disparities in mortality among middle-aged and older men: does marriage matter? Am J Mens Health 9:289–300CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ening G, Huynh MT, Schmieder K, Brenke C (2015) Repeat-surgery at glioblastoma recurrence, when and why to operate? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 136:89–94CrossRefPubMed Ening G, Huynh MT, Schmieder K, Brenke C (2015) Repeat-surgery at glioblastoma recurrence, when and why to operate? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 136:89–94CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hasan S, Chen E, Lanciano R et al (2015) Salvage fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a single institution experience. Front Oncol 15:106 Hasan S, Chen E, Lanciano R et al (2015) Salvage fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a single institution experience. Front Oncol 15:106
25.
go back to reference Bakitas MA, Tosteson TD, Li Z et al (2015) Early versus delayed initiation of concurrent palliative oncology care: patient outcomes in the ENABLE III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 33:1438–1445CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bakitas MA, Tosteson TD, Li Z et al (2015) Early versus delayed initiation of concurrent palliative oncology care: patient outcomes in the ENABLE III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 33:1438–1445CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Tieu MT, Lovblom LE, McNamara MG et al (2015) Impact of glycemia on survival of glioblastoma patients treated with radiation and temozolomide. J Neurooncol 124:119–126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tieu MT, Lovblom LE, McNamara MG et al (2015) Impact of glycemia on survival of glioblastoma patients treated with radiation and temozolomide. J Neurooncol 124:119–126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Silvani A, Gaviani P, Lamperti E et al (2011) Metabolic, electrolytes disorders and tromboembolic risk in malignant glioma patients. Neurol Sci 32(Suppl 2):229–231CrossRef Silvani A, Gaviani P, Lamperti E et al (2011) Metabolic, electrolytes disorders and tromboembolic risk in malignant glioma patients. Neurol Sci 32(Suppl 2):229–231CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mayer A, Vaupel P, Struss HG et al (2014) Strong adverse prognostic impact of hyperglycemic episodes during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme. Strahlenther Onkol 190:933–938CrossRefPubMed Mayer A, Vaupel P, Struss HG et al (2014) Strong adverse prognostic impact of hyperglycemic episodes during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme. Strahlenther Onkol 190:933–938CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Pan E, Tsai JS, Mitchell SB (2009) Retrospective study of venous thromboembolic and intracerebral hemorrhagic events in glioblastoma patients. Anticancer Res 29:4309–4313PubMed Pan E, Tsai JS, Mitchell SB (2009) Retrospective study of venous thromboembolic and intracerebral hemorrhagic events in glioblastoma patients. Anticancer Res 29:4309–4313PubMed
30.
go back to reference Goerig NL, Gaipel U, Frey B et al (2015) Cytomegalovirus-Encephalitis als Ursache neurologischer Verschlechterung während der Radiotherapie und/oder Chemotherapie des Cerebrums. Strahlenther Onkol 191(Suppl 1):39 Goerig NL, Gaipel U, Frey B et al (2015) Cytomegalovirus-Encephalitis als Ursache neurologischer Verschlechterung während der Radiotherapie und/oder Chemotherapie des Cerebrums. Strahlenther Onkol 191(Suppl 1):39
Metadata
Title
Recurrent glioblastoma: who receives tumor specific treatment and how often?
Authors
Rieke Steffens
Sabine Semrau
Godehard Lahmer
Florian Putz
Sebastian Lettmaier
Ilker Eyüpoglu
Michael Buchfelder
Rainer Fietkau
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2079-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2016 Go to the issue