Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 12/2013

01-12-2013 | Editorial

Can MGMT promoter methylation status be used as a prognostic and predictive marker for glioblastoma multiforme at the present time?

A word of caution

Authors: R. Fietkau, Prof. Dr. med., F. Putz, G. Lahmer, S. Semrau, R. Buslei

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

Several studies have addressed the prognostic and predictive value of the methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). In a translational study analyzing the randomized EORTC-26981-22981/NCIC-CE3 trial by Stupp et al. [9], Hegi and coworkers [4] first demonstrated that the benefit of combined radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy over radiotherapy alone was significant in GBM patients with a methylated MGMT promoter (median survival: 21.7 versus 15.3 months; p < 0.001), but only slight and borderline significant in those with an unmethylated status (median survival: 12.7 versus 11.8 months; p < 0.06). MGMT promoter methylation was found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio: 0.41; p = 0.001). However, these initial results were partly offset by the results of a five-year analysis published by the same group at a later date [8]. In the latter study, the addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy also had a significant beneficial effect in patients with an unmethylated MGMT promoter (median survival: 12.6 vs. 11.8 months; p = 0.035). …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berghoff AS, Stefanits H, Woehrer A et al. (2013) Clinical neuropathology practice guide 3-2013: levels of evidence and clinical utility of prognostic and predictive candidate brain tumor biomarkers. Clinical Neuropathology 32:148–158PubMedCrossRef Berghoff AS, Stefanits H, Woehrer A et al. (2013) Clinical neuropathology practice guide 3-2013: levels of evidence and clinical utility of prognostic and predictive candidate brain tumor biomarkers. Clinical Neuropathology 32:148–158PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Felsberg J, Rapp M, Loeser S et.al. (2009)Prognostic significance of molecular markers and extent of resection in primary glioblastoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:6683–93.PubMedCrossRef Felsberg J, Rapp M, Loeser S et.al. (2009)Prognostic significance of molecular markers and extent of resection in primary glioblastoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:6683–93.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Felsberg J, Thon N, Eigenbrod S et al. (2011) Promoter methylation and expression of MGMT and the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 in paired primary and recurrent glioblastomas. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 129:659–670PubMedCrossRef Felsberg J, Thon N, Eigenbrod S et al. (2011) Promoter methylation and expression of MGMT and the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 in paired primary and recurrent glioblastomas. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 129:659–670PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al. (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. The New England Journal of Medicine 352:997–1003PubMedCrossRef Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al. (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. The New England Journal of Medicine 352:997–1003PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Malmstrom A, Gronberg BH, Marosi C et al. (2012) Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 13:916–926PubMedCrossRef Malmstrom A, Gronberg BH, Marosi C et al. (2012) Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 13:916–926PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Shah N, Lin B, Sibenaller Z et al. (2011) Comprehensive analysis of MGMT promoter methylation: correlation with MGMT expression and clinical response in GBM. PloS one 6:e16146PubMedCrossRef Shah N, Lin B, Sibenaller Z et al. (2011) Comprehensive analysis of MGMT promoter methylation: correlation with MGMT expression and clinical response in GBM. PloS one 6:e16146PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al. (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. The Lancet Oncology 10:459–466PubMedCrossRef Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al. (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. The Lancet Oncology 10:459–466PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Vlassenbroeck I, Califice S, Diserens AC et al. (2008) Validation of Real-Time MSP to Determine MGMT Promoter Methylation in Glioma. J Mol Diagn 10:332–337.PubMedCrossRef Vlassenbroeck I, Califice S, Diserens AC et al. (2008) Validation of Real-Time MSP to Determine MGMT Promoter Methylation in Glioma. J Mol Diagn 10:332–337.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wick W, Platten M, Meisner C et al. (2012) Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 13:707–715PubMedCrossRef Wick W, Platten M, Meisner C et al. (2012) Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 13:707–715PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Can MGMT promoter methylation status be used as a prognostic and predictive marker for glioblastoma multiforme at the present time?
A word of caution
Authors
R. Fietkau, Prof. Dr. med.
F. Putz
G. Lahmer
S. Semrau
R. Buslei
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-013-0459-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 12/2013 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften

Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften