Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2009

Open Access 01-05-2009 | Clinical Study - Patient Studies

Frame-based stereotaxy in a frameless era: current capabilities, relative role, and the positive- and negative predictive values of blood through the needle

Authors: Christopher M. Owen, Mark E. Linskey

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction In the modern era of frameless stereotaxis (FL), the role of frame-based (FB) stereotactic needle biopsy is evolving. Methods Retrospective review of prospective database of 106 lesions in 91 consecutive patients undergoing FB stereotactic needle biopsy with a systematic “geologic core” technique by a single surgeon. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated comparing biopsy diagnosis with final pathology in 11 patients who underwent subsequent surgical resection. All instances of intra-operative bleeding through the needle were prospectively noted and compared with post-biopsy CT scan. Lesions were classified as risky for FL technique if they were (1) infratentorial or pineal, (2) within 10 mm of the circle of Willis or root of the Sylvian fissure, or (3) within 10 mm of deep cerebral veins. Results Diagnostic yield was 94%. Diagnostic accuracy was 91%. Of 18 lesions involving the corpus callosum, 13 (72.2%) were GBM 2 were anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 each were found to be anaplastic oligodendroglioma, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and tumescent MS. Of 25 multifocal lesions, malignant primary brain tumor was diagnosed in 17 (68%) (11 GBM, 3 PCNSL, 2 anaplastic ologodendroglioma, and 1 anaplastic astrocytoma). Mortality was 0%. Three patients developed temporary neurologic deficits and one had permanent deficit. Absence of persistent blood through the biopsy needle had a negative predicative value of 98.8% for subsequent neuroimaging blood >5 mm diameter. According to our criteria, 80% of patients would have been candidates for FL biopsy. Conclusions Stereotactic biopsy is an effective, safe and important technique for histologic diagnosis of brain lesions, particularly for multifocal and corpus callosum lesions. Post-biopsy CT can be safely reserved for patients who demonstrate persistent bleeding through the biopsy needle. FB stereotaxy remains an important technique for the 20% with small or deep seated lesions or when it is advantageous to avoid an incision, a burr hole or general anesthesia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ostertag CB, Mennel HD, Kiessling M (1980) Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors. Surg Neurol 14:275–283PubMed Ostertag CB, Mennel HD, Kiessling M (1980) Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors. Surg Neurol 14:275–283PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lobato RD, Rivas JJ, Cabello A, Roger R (1982) Stereotactic biopsy of brain lesions visualized with computed tomography. Appl Neurophysiol 45:426–430. doi:10.1159/000101637 PubMed Lobato RD, Rivas JJ, Cabello A, Roger R (1982) Stereotactic biopsy of brain lesions visualized with computed tomography. Appl Neurophysiol 45:426–430. doi:10.​1159/​000101637 PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mundinger F (1985) CT stereotactic biopsy for optimizing the therapy of intracranial processes. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 35:70–74 Mundinger F (1985) CT stereotactic biopsy for optimizing the therapy of intracranial processes. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 35:70–74
9.
go back to reference Paleologos TS, Dorward NL, Wadley JP, Thomas DG (2001) Clinical validation of true frameless stereotactic biopsy: analysis of the first 125 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 49:830–835 discussion 835–837PubMedCrossRef Paleologos TS, Dorward NL, Wadley JP, Thomas DG (2001) Clinical validation of true frameless stereotactic biopsy: analysis of the first 125 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 49:830–835 discussion 835–837PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smith JS, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Barbaro NM, McDermott MW (2005) Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy. J Neurooncol 73:173–179. doi:10.1007/s11060-004-4208-3 PubMedCrossRef Smith JS, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Barbaro NM, McDermott MW (2005) Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy. J Neurooncol 73:173–179. doi:10.​1007/​s11060-004-4208-3 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2006) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 104:233–237. doi:10.3171/jns.2006.104.2.233 PubMedCrossRef Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2006) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 104:233–237. doi:10.​3171/​jns.​2006.​104.​2.​233 PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sackett DL (1997) Evidence based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, New York Sackett DL (1997) Evidence based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, New York
13.
go back to reference Linskey ME, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC (1991) Neuroimaging of acoustic nerve sheath tumors after stereotaxic radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12:1165–1175PubMed Linskey ME, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC (1991) Neuroimaging of acoustic nerve sheath tumors after stereotaxic radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12:1165–1175PubMed
14.
16.
go back to reference Woodworth G, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2005) Accuracy of frameless and frame-based image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy in the diagnosis of glioma: comparison of biopsy and open resection specimen. Neurol Res 27:358–362. doi:10.1179/016164105X40057 PubMedCrossRef Woodworth G, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2005) Accuracy of frameless and frame-based image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy in the diagnosis of glioma: comparison of biopsy and open resection specimen. Neurol Res 27:358–362. doi:10.​1179/​016164105X40057 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ulm AJ, Bova FJ, Friedman WA (2001) Stereotactic biopsy aided by a computer graphics workstation: experience with 200 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol 56:366–371 discussion 371–362PubMedCrossRef Ulm AJ, Bova FJ, Friedman WA (2001) Stereotactic biopsy aided by a computer graphics workstation: experience with 200 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol 56:366–371 discussion 371–362PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Field M, Witham TF, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD (2001) Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 94:545–551PubMed Field M, Witham TF, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD (2001) Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 94:545–551PubMed
19.
go back to reference Regis J, Bouillot P, Rouby-Volot F, Figarella-Branger D, Dufour H, Peragut JC (1996) Pineal region tumors and the role of stereotactic biopsy: review of the mortality, morbidity, and diagnostic rates in 370 cases. Neurosurgery 39:907–912 discussion 912–904PubMedCrossRef Regis J, Bouillot P, Rouby-Volot F, Figarella-Branger D, Dufour H, Peragut JC (1996) Pineal region tumors and the role of stereotactic biopsy: review of the mortality, morbidity, and diagnostic rates in 370 cases. Neurosurgery 39:907–912 discussion 912–904PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bernstein M, Parrent AG (1994) Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 81:165–168PubMed Bernstein M, Parrent AG (1994) Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 81:165–168PubMed
23.
go back to reference McGirt MJ, Woodworth GF, Coon AL, Frazier JM, Amundson E, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2005) Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases. J Neurosurg 102:897–901PubMed McGirt MJ, Woodworth GF, Coon AL, Frazier JM, Amundson E, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2005) Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases. J Neurosurg 102:897–901PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kulkarni AV, Guha A, Lozano A, Bernstein M (1998) Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 89:31–35PubMed Kulkarni AV, Guha A, Lozano A, Bernstein M (1998) Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 89:31–35PubMed
26.
go back to reference Mascott CR, Sol JC, Bousquet P, Lagarrigue J, Lazorthes Y, Lauwers-Cances V (2006) Quantification of true in vivo application accuracy in cranial image-guided surgery: influence of mode of patient registration. Neurosurgery 59:ONS146–ONS156 discussion ONS146–156PubMedCrossRef Mascott CR, Sol JC, Bousquet P, Lagarrigue J, Lazorthes Y, Lauwers-Cances V (2006) Quantification of true in vivo application accuracy in cranial image-guided surgery: influence of mode of patient registration. Neurosurgery 59:ONS146–ONS156 discussion ONS146–156PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dorward NL, Alberti O, Palmer JD, Kitchen ND, Thomas DG (1999) Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. J Neurosurg 90:160–168PubMed Dorward NL, Alberti O, Palmer JD, Kitchen ND, Thomas DG (1999) Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. J Neurosurg 90:160–168PubMed
28.
go back to reference Quinones-Hinojosa A, Ware ML, Sanai N, McDermott MW (2006) Assessment of image guided accuracy in a skull model: comparison of frameless stereotaxy techniques vs. frame-based localization. J Neurooncol 76:65–70. doi:10.1007/s11060-005-2915-z PubMedCrossRef Quinones-Hinojosa A, Ware ML, Sanai N, McDermott MW (2006) Assessment of image guided accuracy in a skull model: comparison of frameless stereotaxy techniques vs. frame-based localization. J Neurooncol 76:65–70. doi:10.​1007/​s11060-005-2915-z PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DM, Kemeny AA (1996) A phantom study to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization, using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic system. Neurosurgery 38:170–176 discussion 176–178PubMedCrossRef Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DM, Kemeny AA (1996) A phantom study to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization, using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic system. Neurosurgery 38:170–176 discussion 176–178PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maciunas RJ, Galloway RL Jr, Latimer JW (1994) The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery 35:682–694 discussion 694–685PubMedCrossRef Maciunas RJ, Galloway RL Jr, Latimer JW (1994) The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery 35:682–694 discussion 694–685PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Starr PA, Christine CW, Theodosopoulos PV, Lindsey N, Byrd D, Mosley A, Marks WJ Jr (2002) Implantation of deep brain stimulators into the subthalamic nucleus: technical approach and magnetic resonance imaging-verified lead locations. J Neurosurg 97:370–387PubMedCrossRef Starr PA, Christine CW, Theodosopoulos PV, Lindsey N, Byrd D, Mosley A, Marks WJ Jr (2002) Implantation of deep brain stimulators into the subthalamic nucleus: technical approach and magnetic resonance imaging-verified lead locations. J Neurosurg 97:370–387PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Helm PA, Eckel TS (1998) Accuracy of registration methods in frameless stereotaxis. Comput Aided Surg 3:51–56PubMedCrossRef Helm PA, Eckel TS (1998) Accuracy of registration methods in frameless stereotaxis. Comput Aided Surg 3:51–56PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Grunert P, Espinosa J, Busert C, Gunthner M, Filippi R, Farag S, Hopf N (2002) Stereotactic biopsies guided by an optical navigation system: technique and clinical experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:11–15. doi:10.1055/s-2002-23576 PubMedCrossRef Grunert P, Espinosa J, Busert C, Gunthner M, Filippi R, Farag S, Hopf N (2002) Stereotactic biopsies guided by an optical navigation system: technique and clinical experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:11–15. doi:10.​1055/​s-2002-23576 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Frame-based stereotaxy in a frameless era: current capabilities, relative role, and the positive- and negative predictive values of blood through the needle
Authors
Christopher M. Owen
Mark E. Linskey
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-9871-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2009 Go to the issue