Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2016

01-12-2016 | Editorial

Empathy and violence

Authors: Henk ten Have, Bert Gordijn

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Empathy is a central concept in healthcare ethics. It is commonly regarded as the necessary basis for good healthcare. Quality care cannot be provided if providers lack empathy. They may deliver excellent and top-notch technical assistance or interventions but without attention to the person who is attended to, something essential is missing. Since its foundation this journal has published several articles on empathy examining its moral, conceptual and social dimensions, for example, Gelhaus (2012), Pedersen (2008) and Svenaeus (2014). However, empathy is not merely crucial in specific activities such as healthcare, nursing and humanitarian assistance. It is essential for humanity as such. The capacity to understand the feelings and experiences of other persons is what makes human beings human. If we encounter a person who is suffering we can identify with and feel his or her suffering. We recognize common humanity and share vulnerability. It is also argued that empathy has been the origin of the human rights movement. The recognition in popular literature that some human beings have miserable lives or are violated and abused, stimulated feelings of sympathy in fellow human beings, and thus appealed to empathy motivating to action to enhance their situation (Hunt 2007). …
Literature
go back to reference Borgo, M and Picozzi, M. 2016. The Separation Wall and the right to healthcare. Med Health Care and Philos. This issue. Borgo, M and Picozzi, M. 2016. The Separation Wall and the right to healthcare. Med Health Care and Philos. This issue.
go back to reference Chalitta, M. 2016. From emphatic mind to moral behaviour—The ‘who’,’why’ and ‘how’. Med Health Care and Philos. This issue. Chalitta, M. 2016. From emphatic mind to moral behaviour—The ‘who’,’why’ and ‘how’. Med Health Care and Philos. This issue.
go back to reference Gelhaus, P. 2012. The desired moral attitude of the physician: (I) empathy. Med Health Care and Philos 15(2): 103–113.CrossRef Gelhaus, P. 2012. The desired moral attitude of the physician: (I) empathy. Med Health Care and Philos 15(2): 103–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Hunt, L. 2007. Inventing human rights. A history. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company. Hunt, L. 2007. Inventing human rights. A history. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.
go back to reference Pedersen, R. 2008. Empathy: A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Med Health Care and Philos 11(3): 325–335.CrossRef Pedersen, R. 2008. Empathy: A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Med Health Care and Philos 11(3): 325–335.CrossRef
go back to reference Pluut, B. 2016. Differences that matter: developing critical insights into discourses of patient-centredness. Med Health Care and Philos. This issue. Pluut, B. 2016. Differences that matter: developing critical insights into discourses of patient-centredness. Med Health Care and Philos. This issue.
go back to reference Svenaeus, F. 2014. The phenomenology of empathy in medicine: an Introduction. Med Health Care and Philos 17: 245–248.CrossRef Svenaeus, F. 2014. The phenomenology of empathy in medicine: an Introduction. Med Health Care and Philos 17: 245–248.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Empathy and violence
Authors
Henk ten Have
Bert Gordijn
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9730-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2016 Go to the issue