Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 10/2014

01-12-2014

Validation of Self-reported Maternal and Infant Health Indicators in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System

Authors: Patricia Dietz, Jennifer Bombard, Candace Mulready-Ward, John Gauthier, Judith Sackoff, Peggy Brozicevic, Melissa Gambatese, Michael Nyland-Funke, Lucinda England, Leslie Harrison, Allan Taylor

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

To assess the validity of self-reported maternal and infant health indicators reported by mothers an average of 4 months after delivery. Three validity measures—sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV)—were calculated for pregnancy history, pregnancy complications, health care utilization, and infant health indicators self-reported on the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) questionnaire by a representative sample of mothers delivering live births in New York City (NYC) (n = 603) and Vermont (n = 664) in 2009. Data abstracted from hospital records served as gold standards. All data were weighted to be representative of women delivering live births in NYC or Vermont during the study period. Most PRAMS indicators had >90 % specificity. Indicators with >90 % sensitivity and PPV for both sites included prior live birth, any diabetes, and Medicaid insurance at delivery, and for Vermont only, infant admission to the NICU and breastfeeding in the hospital. Indicators with poor sensitivity and PPV (<70 %) for both sites (i.e., NYC and Vermont) included placenta previa and/or placental abruption, urinary tract infection or kidney infection, and for NYC only, preterm labor, prior low-birth-weight birth, and prior preterm birth. For Vermont only, receipt of an HIV test during pregnancy had poor sensitivity and PPV. Mothers accurately reported information on prior live births and Medicaid insurance at delivery; however, mothers’ recall of certain pregnancy complications and pregnancy history was poor. These findings could be used to prioritize data collection of indicators with high validity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stuart, J. J., Merz, C. N. B., Berga, S. L., Miller, V. M., Ouyang, P., Shufelt, C. L., et al. (2013). Maternal recall of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review. Journal of Women’s Health, 22(00), 1–11. Stuart, J. J., Merz, C. N. B., Berga, S. L., Miller, V. M., Ouyang, P., Shufelt, C. L., et al. (2013). Maternal recall of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review. Journal of Women’s Health, 22(00), 1–11.
2.
go back to reference Tilley, B. C., Barnes, A. B., Bergstralh, E., Labarthe, D., Noller, K. L., Colton, T., et al. (1985). A comparison of pregnancy history recall and medical records. Implications for retrospective studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 121(2), 269–281.PubMed Tilley, B. C., Barnes, A. B., Bergstralh, E., Labarthe, D., Noller, K. L., Colton, T., et al. (1985). A comparison of pregnancy history recall and medical records. Implications for retrospective studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 121(2), 269–281.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lederman, S. A., & Paxton, A. (1998). Maternal reporting of prepregnancy weight and birth outcome: Consistency and completeness compared with the clinical record. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(2), 123–126.PubMedCrossRef Lederman, S. A., & Paxton, A. (1998). Maternal reporting of prepregnancy weight and birth outcome: Consistency and completeness compared with the clinical record. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(2), 123–126.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hakim, R. B., Tielsch, J. M., & See, L. C. (1992). Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 136(5), 566–573.PubMed Hakim, R. B., Tielsch, J. M., & See, L. C. (1992). Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 136(5), 566–573.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Casey, R., Rieckhoff, M., Beebe, S. A., & Pinto-Martin, J. (1992). Obstetric and perinatal events: The accuracy of maternal report. Clinical Pediatrics (Phila), 31(4), 200–204.CrossRef Casey, R., Rieckhoff, M., Beebe, S. A., & Pinto-Martin, J. (1992). Obstetric and perinatal events: The accuracy of maternal report. Clinical Pediatrics (Phila), 31(4), 200–204.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Githens, P. B., Glass, C. A., Sloan, F. A., & Entman, S. S. (1993). Maternal recall and medical records: An examination of events during pregnancy, childbirth, and early infancy. Birth, 20(3), 136–141. PubMed PMID: 8240621 (Epub 1993/09/01. Eng). Githens, P. B., Glass, C. A., Sloan, F. A., & Entman, S. S. (1993). Maternal recall and medical records: An examination of events during pregnancy, childbirth, and early infancy. Birth, 20(3), 136–141. PubMed PMID: 8240621 (Epub 1993/09/01. Eng).
7.
go back to reference Buka, S. L., Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., & Tsuang, M. T. (2000). Maternal recall of pregnancy history: Accuracy and bias in schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(2), 335–350.PubMedCrossRef Buka, S. L., Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., & Tsuang, M. T. (2000). Maternal recall of pregnancy history: Accuracy and bias in schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(2), 335–350.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Buka, S. L., Goldstein, J. M., Spartos, E., & Tsuang, M. T. (2004). The retrospective measurement of prenatal and perinatal events: Accuracy of maternal recall. Schizophrenia Research, 71(2–3), 417–426.PubMedCrossRef Buka, S. L., Goldstein, J. M., Spartos, E., & Tsuang, M. T. (2004). The retrospective measurement of prenatal and perinatal events: Accuracy of maternal recall. Schizophrenia Research, 71(2–3), 417–426.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jurek, A. M., Greenland, S., Spector, L. G., Roesler, M. A., Robison, L. L., & Ross, J. A. (2011). Self-report versus medical record—perinatal factors in a study of infant leukaemia: A study from the Children’s Oncology Group. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 25(6), 540–548.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jurek, A. M., Greenland, S., Spector, L. G., Roesler, M. A., Robison, L. L., & Ross, J. A. (2011). Self-report versus medical record—perinatal factors in a study of infant leukaemia: A study from the Children’s Oncology Group. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 25(6), 540–548.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tomeo, C. A., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Michels, K. B., Berkey, C. S., Hunter, D. J., Frazier, A. L., et al. (1999). Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiology, 10(6), 774–777.PubMedCrossRef Tomeo, C. A., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Michels, K. B., Berkey, C. S., Hunter, D. J., Frazier, A. L., et al. (1999). Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiology, 10(6), 774–777.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yawn, B. P., Suman, V. J., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1998). Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(5), 399–405.PubMedCrossRef Yawn, B. P., Suman, V. J., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1998). Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(5), 399–405.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Seidman, D. S., Slater, P. E., Ever-Hadani, P., & Gale, R. (1987). Accuracy of mothers’ recall of birthweight and gestational age. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 94(8), 731–735.PubMedCrossRef Seidman, D. S., Slater, P. E., Ever-Hadani, P., & Gale, R. (1987). Accuracy of mothers’ recall of birthweight and gestational age. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 94(8), 731–735.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Piper, J. M. M. E., Snowden, M., Hall, C., Adams, M., & Taylor, P. (1993). Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137(7), 758–768.PubMed Piper, J. M. M. E., Snowden, M., Hall, C., Adams, M., & Taylor, P. (1993). Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137(7), 758–768.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Li, R., Scanlon, K. S., & Serdula, M. K. (2005). The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice. Nutrition Reviews, 63(4), 103–110.PubMedCrossRef Li, R., Scanlon, K. S., & Serdula, M. K. (2005). The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice. Nutrition Reviews, 63(4), 103–110.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yudin, M. H., Barbara, A. M., Guenter, D., Shaul, R. Z., Remis, R. S., & King, S. M. (2006). Medical records and women’s self-report are not reliable sources for determining whether prenatal HIV testing was done. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC), 28(10), 867–872. Yudin, M. H., Barbara, A. M., Guenter, D., Shaul, R. Z., Remis, R. S., & King, S. M. (2006). Medical records and women’s self-report are not reliable sources for determining whether prenatal HIV testing was done. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC), 28(10), 867–872.
16.
go back to reference O’Campo, P., de Boer, M., Faden, R., Kass, N., Gielen, A., & Barbacci, M. (1997). Confirmation of self-report of HIV testing among a cohort of pregnant women. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 57–61.PubMedCrossRef O’Campo, P., de Boer, M., Faden, R., Kass, N., Gielen, A., & Barbacci, M. (1997). Confirmation of self-report of HIV testing among a cohort of pregnant women. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 57–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of Self-reported Maternal and Infant Health Indicators in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
Authors
Patricia Dietz
Jennifer Bombard
Candace Mulready-Ward
John Gauthier
Judith Sackoff
Peggy Brozicevic
Melissa Gambatese
Michael Nyland-Funke
Lucinda England
Leslie Harrison
Allan Taylor
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1487-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Maternal and Child Health Journal 10/2014 Go to the issue