Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2019

01-12-2019

Impact of Functional Capacity Evaluation on Patient-Reported Functional Ability: An Exploratory Diagnostic Before–After Study

Authors: Martin Schindl, Sylvia Wassipaul, Tanja Wagner, Karin Gstaltner, Matthias Bethge

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction Work capacity in patients with orthopedic trauma and long-lasting inactivity is significantly reduced. Functional capacity evaluation (FCE) is a diagnostic approach for developing recommendations for a return to work and further occupational rehabilitation when the ability to carry out previous job demands is uncertain. However, FCE may also have direct effects on the patients’ appraisal of their functional ability. Our study therefore evaluated the change in patient-reported functional ability after the performance of an FCE. Methods We performed a diagnostic before–after study in 161 consecutively recruited patients with trauma who were referred for FCE at the end of an interdisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation program in Austria. Patients completed the Spinal Function Sort to assess patient-reported functional ability both prior to the FCE and after completing it. Results Patient-reported functional ability (0–200 points) improved by 14.8 points (95% CI 11.3–18.2). The number of participants who rated their functional ability below their functional capacity as observed by the FCE decreased from 82.6 to 64.6% by about 18 percentage points. Conclusions The performance of the FCE in patients with trauma was associated with an improvement of patient-reported functional ability. The performance of an FCE in trauma rehabilitation may possibly have a direct therapeutic effect on the patient by allowing a more realistic appraisal of the ability to perform relevant work activities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giummarra MJ, Cameron PA, Ponsford J, Ioannou L, Gibson SJ, Jennings PA, et al. Return to work after traumatic injury: increased work-related disability in injured persons receiving financial compensation is mediated by perceived injustice. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(2):173–185.PubMedCrossRef Giummarra MJ, Cameron PA, Ponsford J, Ioannou L, Gibson SJ, Jennings PA, et al. Return to work after traumatic injury: increased work-related disability in injured persons receiving financial compensation is mediated by perceived injustice. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(2):173–185.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):233–256.PubMedCrossRef Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):233–256.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–1259.CrossRef GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–1259.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9061):1269–1276.PubMedCrossRef Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9061):1269–1276.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference De Witte H. Job insecurity and psychological well-being: review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1999;8(2):155–177.CrossRef De Witte H. Job insecurity and psychological well-being: review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1999;8(2):155–177.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference MacKenzie EJ, Morris JA Jr, Jurkovich GJ, Yasui Y, Cushing BM, Burgess AR, et al. Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(11):1630–1637.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef MacKenzie EJ, Morris JA Jr, Jurkovich GJ, Yasui Y, Cushing BM, Burgess AR, et al. Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(11):1630–1637.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Plomb-Holmes C, Luthi F, Vuistiner P, Leger B, Hilfiker R. A return-to-work prognostic model for orthopaedic trauma patients (WORRK) updated for use at 3, 12 and 24 months. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(4):568–575.PubMedCrossRef Plomb-Holmes C, Luthi F, Vuistiner P, Leger B, Hilfiker R. A return-to-work prognostic model for orthopaedic trauma patients (WORRK) updated for use at 3, 12 and 24 months. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(4):568–575.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Genovese E, Galper JS, editors. Guide to the evaluation of functional ability: how to request, interpret, and apply fuctional capacity evaluation. Chicago: American Medical Association Press; 2009. Genovese E, Galper JS, editors. Guide to the evaluation of functional ability: how to request, interpret, and apply fuctional capacity evaluation. Chicago: American Medical Association Press; 2009.
11.
go back to reference James CL, Reneman MF, Gross DP. Functional capacity evaluation research: report from the second International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(1):80–83.PubMedCrossRef James CL, Reneman MF, Gross DP. Functional capacity evaluation research: report from the second International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(1):80–83.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Edelaar MJA, Gross DP, James CL, Reneman MF. Functional capacity evaluation research: report from the third International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):130–134.PubMedCrossRef Edelaar MJA, Gross DP, James CL, Reneman MF. Functional capacity evaluation research: report from the third International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):130–134.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: McGraw Hill; 1984. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: McGraw Hill; 1984.
14.
go back to reference Somerfield MR, McCrae RR. Stress and coping research. Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. Am Psychol. 2000;55(6):620–625.PubMedCrossRef Somerfield MR, McCrae RR. Stress and coping research. Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. Am Psychol. 2000;55(6):620–625.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Aasdahl L, Pape K, Jensen C, Vasseljen O, Braathen T, Johnsen R, et al. Associations between the Readiness for Return to Work Scale and return to work: a prospective study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):97–106.PubMedCrossRef Aasdahl L, Pape K, Jensen C, Vasseljen O, Braathen T, Johnsen R, et al. Associations between the Readiness for Return to Work Scale and return to work: a prospective study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):97–106.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Clay FJ, Newstead SV, McClure RJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2010;41(8):787–803.PubMedCrossRef Clay FJ, Newstead SV, McClure RJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2010;41(8):787–803.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Matheson LN, Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther. 2002;82(3):249–256.PubMed Matheson LN, Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther. 2002;82(3):249–256.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battie MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine. 2004;29(8):914–919.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine. 2004;29(8):914–919.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Wind H, van Duivenbooden C, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Criterion-related validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests on future work disability risk and return to work in the construction industry. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(10):657–663.PubMedCrossRef Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Wind H, van Duivenbooden C, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Criterion-related validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests on future work disability risk and return to work in the construction industry. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(10):657–663.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lechner DE, Page JJ, Sheffield G. Predictive validity of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation. Work. 2008;31(1):21–25.PubMed Lechner DE, Page JJ, Sheffield G. Predictive validity of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation. Work. 2008;31(1):21–25.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Streibelt M, Blume C, Thren K, Reneman MF, Mueller-Fahrnow W. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(3):429–434.PubMedCrossRef Streibelt M, Blume C, Thren K, Reneman MF, Mueller-Fahrnow W. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(3):429–434.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Branton EN, Arnold KM, Appelt SR, Hodges MM, Battie MC, Gross DP. A short-form functional capacity evaluation predicts time to recovery but not sustained return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):387–393.PubMedCrossRef Branton EN, Arnold KM, Appelt SR, Hodges MM, Battie MC, Gross DP. A short-form functional capacity evaluation predicts time to recovery but not sustained return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):387–393.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fore L, Perez Y, Neblett R, Asih S, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Improved functional capacity evaluation performance predicts successful return to work one year after completing a functional restoration rehabilitation program. PMR. 2015;7(4):365–375.CrossRef Fore L, Perez Y, Neblett R, Asih S, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Improved functional capacity evaluation performance predicts successful return to work one year after completing a functional restoration rehabilitation program. PMR. 2015;7(4):365–375.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(9):1087–1096.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(9):1087–1096.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ratzon NZ, Amit Y, Friedman S, Zamir S, Rand D. Functional capacity evaluation: does it change the determination of the degree of work disability? Disabil Health J. 2015;8(1):80–85.PubMedCrossRef Ratzon NZ, Amit Y, Friedman S, Zamir S, Rand D. Functional capacity evaluation: does it change the determination of the degree of work disability? Disabil Health J. 2015;8(1):80–85.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Peppers D, Figoni SF, Carroll BW, Chen MM, Song S, Mathiyakom W. Influence of functional capacity evaluation on physician’s assessment of physical capacity of veterans with chronic pain: a retrospective analysis. PMR. 2017;9(7):652–659.CrossRef Peppers D, Figoni SF, Carroll BW, Chen MM, Song S, Mathiyakom W. Influence of functional capacity evaluation on physician’s assessment of physical capacity of veterans with chronic pain: a retrospective analysis. PMR. 2017;9(7):652–659.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Knottnerus JA, Buntinx F, editors. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis: the theory and methods of diagnostic research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008. Knottnerus JA, Buntinx F, editors. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis: the theory and methods of diagnostic research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
29.
go back to reference Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–168.PubMedCrossRef Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–168.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bieniek S, Bethge M. The reliability of WorkWell systems functional capacity evaluation: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bieniek S, Bethge M. The reliability of WorkWell systems functional capacity evaluation: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference De Baets S, Calders P, Schalley N, Vermeulen K, Vertriest S, Van Peteghem L, et al. Updating the evidence on functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):418–428.PubMedCrossRef De Baets S, Calders P, Schalley N, Vermeulen K, Vertriest S, Van Peteghem L, et al. Updating the evidence on functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):418–428.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Spanjer J, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(23–24):2143–2150.PubMedCrossRef Spanjer J, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(23–24):2143–2150.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Matheson LN, Matheson ML. Spinal function sort: Rating of perceived capacity. Text booklet and examiner’s manual. Trabuco Canyon: Performance Assessment and Capacity Testing; 1989. Matheson LN, Matheson ML. Spinal function sort: Rating of perceived capacity. Text booklet and examiner’s manual. Trabuco Canyon: Performance Assessment and Capacity Testing; 1989.
35.
go back to reference Oesch PR, Hilfiker R, Kool JP, Bachmann S, Hagen KB. Perceived functional ability assessed with the spinal function sort: is it valid for European rehabilitation settings in patients with non-specific non-acute low back pain? Eur Spine J. 2010;19(9):1527–1533.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Oesch PR, Hilfiker R, Kool JP, Bachmann S, Hagen KB. Perceived functional ability assessed with the spinal function sort: is it valid for European rehabilitation settings in patients with non-specific non-acute low back pain? Eur Spine J. 2010;19(9):1527–1533.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Trippolini MA, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Measurement properties of the Spinal Function Sort in patients with sub-acute whiplash-associated disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):527–536.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Trippolini MA, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Measurement properties of the Spinal Function Sort in patients with sub-acute whiplash-associated disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):527–536.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):178–189.CrossRef Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):178–189.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Büschel C, Greitemann B, Schaidhammer M. Stellenwert der Evaluation der funktionellen Leistungsfähigkeit nach Isernhagen (EFL) in der sozialmedizinischen Begutachtung des Leistungsvermögens. Teil 2: Eigene Ergebnisse zu Nutzen und Risiken des Verfahrens für Gutachter und Patienten [Significance of the FCE testing according to Isernhagen (FCE) in the assessment of work ability. Part 2: Own results regarding risks and benefits for surveyor and patient]. Med Sach. 2008;104(6):212–219. Büschel C, Greitemann B, Schaidhammer M. Stellenwert der Evaluation der funktionellen Leistungsfähigkeit nach Isernhagen (EFL) in der sozialmedizinischen Begutachtung des Leistungsvermögens. Teil 2: Eigene Ergebnisse zu Nutzen und Risiken des Verfahrens für Gutachter und Patienten [Significance of the FCE testing according to Isernhagen (FCE) in the assessment of work ability. Part 2: Own results regarding risks and benefits for surveyor and patient]. Med Sach. 2008;104(6):212–219.
39.
go back to reference Gross D, Battié M. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82(4):364–371.PubMed Gross D, Battié M. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82(4):364–371.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Hart DL, Isernhagen SJ, Matheson LN. Guidelines for functional capacity evaluation of people with medical conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18(6):682–686.PubMedCrossRef Hart DL, Isernhagen SJ, Matheson LN. Guidelines for functional capacity evaluation of people with medical conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18(6):682–686.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bühne D, Alles T, Froböse I. Der Einfluss des FCE-Verfahrens ELA auf die Selbsteinschätzung des Patienten in der MBOR [Impact of “ELA” FCE testing protocol on patients’ self-estimation in work-ability centered rehabilitation programs (“MBOR”)]. DRV-Schriften. 2017;111:195–197. Bühne D, Alles T, Froböse I. Der Einfluss des FCE-Verfahrens ELA auf die Selbsteinschätzung des Patienten in der MBOR [Impact of “ELA” FCE testing protocol on patients’ self-estimation in work-ability centered rehabilitation programs (“MBOR”)]. DRV-Schriften. 2017;111:195–197.
Metadata
Title
Impact of Functional Capacity Evaluation on Patient-Reported Functional Ability: An Exploratory Diagnostic Before–After Study
Authors
Martin Schindl
Sylvia Wassipaul
Tanja Wagner
Karin Gstaltner
Matthias Bethge
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09829-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2019 Go to the issue