Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2010

01-09-2010

A Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation Predicts Time to Recovery but Not Sustained Return-to-Work

Authors: Erin N. Branton, Kelly M. Arnold, Sheena R. Appelt, Megan M. Hodges, Michele C. Battié, Douglas P. Gross

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the ability of a short-form FCE to predict future timely and sustained return-to-work. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted using data collected during a cluster RCT. Subject performance on the items in the short-form FCE was compared to administrative recovery outcomes from a workers’ compensation database. Outcomes included days to claim closure, days to time loss benefit suspension and future recurrence (defined as re-opening a closed claim, restarting benefits, or filing a new claim for injury to the same body region). Analysis included multivariable Cox and logistic regression using a risk factor modeling strategy. Potential confounders included age, sex, injury duration, and job attachment status, among others. Results The sample included 147 compensation claimants with a variety of musculoskeletal injuries. Subjects who demonstrated job demand levels on all FCE items were more likely to have their claims closed (adjusted Hazard Ratio 5.52 (95% Confidence Interval 3.42–8.89), and benefits suspended (adjusted Hazard Ratio 5.45 (95% Confidence Interval 2.73–10.85) over the follow-up year. The proportion of variance explained by the FCE ranged from 18 to 27%. FCE performance was not significantly associated with future recurrence. Conclusion A short-form FCE appears to provide useful information for predicting time to recovery as measured through administrative outcomes, but not injury recurrence. The short-form FCE may be an efficient option for clinicians using FCE in the management of injured workers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Soer R, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Towards consensus in operational definitions in functional capacity evaluation: a Delphi Survey. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:389–400.CrossRefPubMed Soer R, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Towards consensus in operational definitions in functional capacity evaluation: a Delphi Survey. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:389–400.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998;78:852–66.PubMed King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998;78:852–66.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehab. 1992;2:157–68.CrossRef Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehab. 1992;2:157–68.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1999;24:2254–60. (discussion 60-1).CrossRefPubMed Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1999;24:2254–60. (discussion 60-1).CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC. Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:285–94.CrossRefPubMed Gross DP, Battié MC. Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:285–94.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine. 2004;29:914–9.CrossRefPubMed Gross DP, Battié MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine. 2004;29:914–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2: sustained recovery. Spine. 2004;29:920–4.CrossRefPubMed Gross DP, Battié MC. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2: sustained recovery. Spine. 2004;29:920–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Streibelt M, Blume C, Thren K, Reneman MF, Mueller-Fahrnow W. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:429–34.CrossRefPubMed Streibelt M, Blume C, Thren K, Reneman MF, Mueller-Fahrnow W. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:429–34.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Soer R, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Reesink DD, Reneman MF. Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:290–8.CrossRefPubMed Soer R, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Reesink DD, Reneman MF. Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:290–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Kuijer W, Brouwer S, et al. Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:197–205.CrossRefPubMed Reneman MF, Kuijer W, Brouwer S, et al. Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:197–205.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC, Asante AK. Evaluation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation: less may be best. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:422–35.CrossRefPubMed Gross DP, Battié MC, Asante AK. Evaluation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation: less may be best. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:422–35.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC, Asante A. Development and validation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:53–62.CrossRefPubMed Gross DP, Battié MC, Asante A. Development and validation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:53–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40:171–82.CrossRefPubMed Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40:171–82.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chibnall JT, Tait RC. The Pain Disability Index: factor structure and normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1082–6.CrossRefPubMed Chibnall JT, Tait RC. The Pain Disability Index: factor structure and normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1082–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, Mayo N. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, Mayo N. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002.
16.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. 1st ed. New York: Wiley; 1999. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. 1st ed. New York: Wiley; 1999.
17.
go back to reference Nemes S, Jonasson JM, Genell A, Steineck G. Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:56.CrossRefPubMed Nemes S, Jonasson JM, Genell A, Steineck G. Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:56.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wasiak R, Verma S, Pransky G, Webster B. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:68–76.CrossRefPubMed Wasiak R, Verma S, Pransky G, Webster B. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:68–76.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wasiak R, Pransky GS, Webster BS. Methodological challenges in studying recurrence of low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:21–31.CrossRefPubMed Wasiak R, Pransky GS, Webster BS. Methodological challenges in studying recurrence of low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:21–31.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehab. 2002;12:269–75.CrossRef Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehab. 2002;12:269–75.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battié MC. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82:364–71.PubMed Gross DP, Battié MC. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82:364–71.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Frings-Dresen MH. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77:527–37.CrossRefPubMed Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Frings-Dresen MH. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77:527–37.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference van Ittersum MW, Bieleman HJ, Reneman MF, Oosterveld FG, Groothoff JW, van der Schans CP. Functional capacity evaluation in subjects with early osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; is two-day testing needed? J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:238–44.CrossRefPubMed van Ittersum MW, Bieleman HJ, Reneman MF, Oosterveld FG, Groothoff JW, van der Schans CP. Functional capacity evaluation in subjects with early osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; is two-day testing needed? J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:238–44.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation Predicts Time to Recovery but Not Sustained Return-to-Work
Authors
Erin N. Branton
Kelly M. Arnold
Sheena R. Appelt
Megan M. Hodges
Michele C. Battié
Douglas P. Gross
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9233-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2010 Go to the issue