Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-09-2019 | Review

The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review

Authors: Codi White, Rebecca A. Green, Samantha Ferguson, Sarah L. Anderson, Caroline Howe, Jing Sun, Nicholas Buys

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

Purpose In occupational rehabilitation, the biopsychosocial model endorses the role of social factors in worker recovery. We conducted a systematic review to explore three questions examining the role of social support for the return-to-work (RTW) of individuals with work-related injury: (1) What are the worker-identified social barriers and facilitators in RTW; (2) What is the relationship between social factors and RTW; and (3) What is the effectiveness of social interventions for RTW. Methods Systematic searches of six databases were conducted for each research question. These identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria for Research Question 1, and 12 studies for Research Question 2. No studies were identified that met inclusion criteria for Research Question 3. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse the included studies. Results Research Question 1 identified five themes in social barriers and facilitators to RTW, including contact/communication, person-centred approaches, mutual trust, reaction to injury, and social relationships. Research Question 2 identified moderate support for reaction to injury and social integration/functioning as predictors of RTW and weak evidence for co-worker support. Four studies reported significant associations between social factors and RTW, six reported mixed findings with at least one significant social predictor, and two found no significant relationships. However, conclusions were limited by the inconsistency in measurement of social factors. Conclusions Our findings indicate that social support and integration may influence RTW following work-related injury, and highlights the need for further systematic examination of social factors in the field of occupational rehabilitation.

Available only for authorised users

Bartys S, Frederiksen P, Bendix T, Burton K. System influences on work disability due to low back pain: an international evidence synthesis. Health Policy. 2017;121(8):903–912.CrossRef

Lax MB, Klein R. More than meets the eye: social, economic, and emotional impacts of work-related injury and illness. New Solut. 2008;18(3):343–360.CrossRef

Soklaridis S, Cartmill C, Cassidy D. Biographical disruption of injured workers in chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(22–23):2372–2380.CrossRef

Wall CL, Morrissey SA, Ogloff JR. The workers’ compensation experience: a qualitative exploration of workers’ beliefs regarding the impact of the compensation system on their recovery and rehabilitation. Int J Disabil Manag. 2009;4(2):19–26.CrossRef

Shor E, Roelfs DJ. Social contact frequency and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Soc Sci Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.010.CrossRefPubMed

Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

White MI, Wagner SL, Schultz IZ, et al. Non-modifiable worker and workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence: a stakeholder-centred synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2015;52(2):353–373.CrossRef

Wagner S, White M, Schultz I, et al. Modifiable worker risk factors contributing to workplace absence: a stakeholder-centred best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2014;49(4):541–558.PubMed

White M, Wagner S, Schultz IZ, et al. Modifiable workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence across health conditions: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2013;45(4):1–2.

10.

Wagner SL, White MI, Schultz IZ, et al. Social support and supervisory quality interventions in the workplace: a stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews on work outcomes. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2015;6(4):608–189.CrossRef

11.

Rydström I, Englund LD, Dellve L, Ahlstrom L. Importance of social capital at the workplace for return to work among women with a history of long-term sick leave: a cohort study. BMC Nurs. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0234-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Gottlieb BH, Bergen AE. Social support concepts and measures. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69(5):511–520.CrossRef

13.

Lakey B, Cohen S. Social support theory and measurement. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH, editors. Social support measurement and intervention: a guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 29–52.CrossRef

14.

Brissette I, Cohen S, Seeman TE. Measuring social integration and social networks. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH, editors. Social support measurement and intervention: a guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 53–85.CrossRef

15.

Lilley R, Davie G, Langley J, Ameratunga S, Derrett S. Do outcomes differ between work and non-work-related injury in a universal injury compensation system? Findings from the New Zealand Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study. BMC Public Health. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-995.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

United States Department of Labour. 1904 recording and reporting occupational injuries and illness: 1904.5—determination of work-relatedness (2001). https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1904/1904.5. Accessed 15 May 2018.

17.

Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Compensable injuries and health outcomes. Sydney: The Royal Australasian College of Physicians; 2001.

18.

Brouwer S, Krol B, Reneman MF, et al. Behavioral determinants as predictors of return to work after long-term sickness absence: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;19(2):166–174.CrossRef

19.

Kilgour E, Kosny A, McKenzie D, Collie A. Healing or harming? Healthcare provider interactions with injured workers and insurers in workers’ compensation systems. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):220–239.CrossRef

20.

Lynöe N, Wessel M, Olsson D, Alexanderson K, Helgesson G. Does feeling respected influence return to work? Cross-sectional study on sick-listed patients’ experiences of encounters with social insurance office staff. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):268–270.CrossRef

21.

Müssener U, Ståhl C, Söderberg E. Does the quality of encounters affect return to work? Lay people describe their experiences of meeting various professionals during their rehabilitation process. Work. 2015;52(2):447–455.CrossRef

22.

Soberg HL, Finset A, Bautz-Holter E, Sandvik L, Roise O. Return to work after severe multiple injuries: a multidimensional approach on status 1 and 2 years postinjury. J Trauma. 2007;62(2):471–481.CrossRef

23.

Sturesson M, Edlund C, Falkdal AH, Bernspång B. Healthcare encounters and return to work: a qualitative study on sick-listed patients’ experiences. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014;15(4):464–475.CrossRef

24.

Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJ. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):462–477.CrossRef

25.

Steenstra IA, Munhall C, Irvin E, et al. Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):369–381.CrossRef

26.

Tacconelli E. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70065-7.CrossRef

27.

University of York. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York, Centre for Reviews & Dissemination; 2009.

28.

Bunzli S, Singh N, Mazza D, et al. Fear of (re) injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4226-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Buys N, Wagner S, Randall C, et al. Australian employee perspectives on disability management in relation to job satisfaction, physical and mental health, workplace morale and reduced sickness absence. Int J Disabil Manag. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2016.4.CrossRef

30.

Cheng AS, Loisel P, Feuerstein M. Return-to-work activities in a Chinese cultural context. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):44–54.CrossRef

31.

Kosny A, Lifshen M, Pugliese D, et al. Buddies in bad times? The role of co-workers after a work-related injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):438–449.CrossRef

32.

Lysaght RM, Larmour-Trode S. An exploration of social support as a factor in the return-to-work process. Work. 2008;30(3):255–266.PubMed

33.

MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S. Unexpected barriers in return to work: lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups. Work. 2007;29(2):155–164.PubMed

34.

Mansfield E, Stergiou-Kita M, Kirsh B, Colantonio A. After the storm: the social relations of return to work following electrical injury. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(9):1183–1197.CrossRef

35.

Mullen K, Gillen M, Kools S, Blanc P. Hospital nurses working wounded: motivations and obstacles to return to work as experienced by nurses with injuries. Work. 2015;50(2):295–304.PubMed

36.

Norlund S, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Nordin M, Stenlund T, Ahlgren C. Personal resources and support when regaining the ability to work: an interview study with exhaustion disorder patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):270–279.CrossRef

37.

Soklaridis S, Ammendolia C, Cassidy D. Looking upstream to understand low back pain and return to work: psychosocial factors as the product of system issues. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(9):1557–1566.CrossRef

38.

Thornthwaite L, Markey R. Return to work after workplace injury: injured workers, insurers and employers. Aust J Soc Issues. 2017;52(2):98–115.CrossRef

39.

Boot CR, Hogg-Johnson S, Bültmann U, Amick BC, van der Beek AJ. Differences in predictors for return to work following musculoskeletal injury between workers with and without somatic comorbidities. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(8):871–879.CrossRef

40.

De Vente W, Kamphuis JH, Blonk RW, Emmelkamp PM. Recovery of work-related stress: complaint reduction and work-resumption are relatively independent processes. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):658–668.CrossRef

41.

Holtedahl R, Veiersted KB. Physical, social and emotional function after work accidents: a medicolegal perspective. Work. 2007;28(4):363–370.PubMed

42.

Jetha A, Lamontagne AD, Lilley R, Hogg-Johnson S, Sim M, Smith P. Workplace social system and sustained return-to-work: a study of supervisor and co-worker supportiveness and injury reaction. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;28(3):486–494.CrossRef

43.

Kong W, Tang D, Luo X, Yu ITS, Liang Y, He Y. Prediction of return to work outcomes under an injured worker case management program. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):230–240.CrossRef

44.

Lee W, Yoon JH, Roh J, et al. Factors related to the physician and the employer influencing successful return to work in Korea: results from the first panel study of workers’ compensation insurance (PSWCI). Ann Occup Environ Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-015-0076-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Li-Tsang CW, Chan HH, Lam C, Lo-Hui KY, Chan CC. Psychosocial aspects of injured workers’ returning to work (RTW) in Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):279–288.CrossRef

46.

Marois E, Durand M. Does participation in interdisciplinary work rehabilitation programme influence return to work obstacles and predictive factors? Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(12):994–1007.CrossRef

47.

Netterstrøm B, Eller NH, Borritz M. Prognostic factors of returning to work after sick leave due to work-related common mental disorders: a one-and three-year follow-up study. Biomed Res Int. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/596572.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Reme SE, Shaw WS, Steenstra IA, Woiszwillo MJ, Pransky G, Linton SJ. Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):541–552.CrossRef

49.

St-Arnaud L, Bourbonnais R, Saint-Jean M, Rhéaume J. Determinants of return-to-work among employees absent due to mental health problems. Relat Ind. 2007;62(4):690–713.

50.

Watt BD, Ford L, Doley RM, et al. Investigating the relationship between social support and durable return to work. Australas J Organ. Psychol. 2015;8:e3.CrossRef

51.

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647.CrossRefPubMed

54.

House JS. Work stress and social support. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1981.

55.

Barrera M. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. Am J Community Psychol. 1986;14(4):413–445.CrossRef

56.

Yang YC, Boen C, Gerken K, Li T, Schorpp K, Harris KM. Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. PNAS. 2016;113(3):578–583.CrossRef

57.

Holt-Lunstad J. Why social relationships are important for physical health: a systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Ahlstrom L, Hagberg M, Dellve L. Workplace rehabilitation and supportive conditions at work: a prospective study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):248–260.CrossRef

59.

60.

Andersen MF, Nielsen K, Brinkmann S. How do workers with common mental disorders experience a multidisciplinary return-to-work intervention? A qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(4):709–724.CrossRef

61.

Brown J, Mackay D, Demou E, Craig J, Frank J, Macdonald EB. The EASY (Early Access to Support for You) sickness absence service: a four-year evaluation of the impact on absenteeism. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(2):204–215.CrossRef

62.

Linton SJ, Boersma K, Traczyk M, Shaw W, Nicholas M. Early workplace communication and problem solving to prevent back disability: results of a randomized controlled trial among high-risk workers and their supervisors. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(2):150–159.CrossRef

63.

Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Boumans N, Noben C, Winkens B, Nijhuis FJ. The effectiveness of an intervention to enhance cooperation between sick-listed employees and their supervisors (COSS). J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(2):229–236.CrossRef

Title: The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review
Authors: Codi White
Rebecca A. Green
Samantha Ferguson
Sarah L. Anderson
Caroline Howe
Jing Sun
Nicholas Buys
Publication date: 01-09-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Improved Expectations About Length of Sick Leave During Occupational Rehabilitation Is Associated with Increased Work Participation

Longitudinal Associations Between Fatigue and Perceived Work Ability in Cancer Survivors

Adaptation of a Guide to Equip Employers to Manage the Gradual Return to Work of Individuals with a Musculoskeletal Disorder

Development of Prediction Models for Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders

Three Out of Ten Working Patients Expect No Clinical Improvement of Their Ability to Perform Work-Related Knee-Demanding Activities After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Dutch Version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ-VL)