Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-06-2009

Behavioral Determinants as Predictors of Return to Work After Long-Term Sickness Absence: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

Authors: Sandra Brouwer, Boudien Krol, Michiel F. Reneman, Ute Bültmann, Renée-Louise Franche, Jac J. L. van der Klink, Johan W. Groothoff

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2009

Abstract

Background The aim of this prospective, longitudinal cohort study was to analyze the association between the three behavioral determinants of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) model—attitude, subjective norm and self-efficacy—and the time to return-to-work (RTW) in employees on long-term sick leave. Methods The study was based on a sample of 926 employees on sickness absence (maximum duration of 12 weeks). The employees filled out a baseline questionnaire and were subsequently followed until the tenth month after listing sick. The TPB-determinants were measured at baseline. Work attitude was measured with a Dutch language version of the Work Involvement Scale. Subjective norm was measured with a self-structured scale reflecting a person’s perception of social support and social pressure. Self-efficacy was measured with the three subscales of a standardised Dutch version of the general self-efficacy scale (ALCOS): willingness to expend effort in completing the behavior, persistence in the face of adversity, and willingness to initiate behavior. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify behavioral determinants of the time to RTW. Results Median time to RTW was 160 days. In the univariate analysis, all potential prognostic factors were significantly associated (P < 0.15) with time to RTW: work attitude, social support, and the three subscales of self-efficacy. The final multivariate model with time to RTW as the predicted outcome included work attitude, social support and willingness to expend effort in completing the behavior as significant predictive factors. Conclusions This prospective, longitudinal cohort-study showed that work attitude, social support and willingness to expend effort in completing the behavior are significantly associated with a shorter time to RTW in employees on long-term sickness absence. This provides suggestive evidence for the relevance of behavioral characteristics in the prediction of duration of sickness absence. It may be a promising approach to address the behavioral determinants in the development of interventions focusing on RTW in employees on long-term sick leave.

Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan MJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:464–84. doi:10.1002/ajim.1116.PubMedCrossRef

Franche R-L, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:233–56. doi:10.1023/A:1020270407044.PubMedCrossRef

Labriola M, Lund T, Christensen KB, Albertsen K, Bültmann U, Jensen JN, et al. Does self-efficacy predict return-to-work after sickness absence? A prospective study among 930 employees with sickness absence for three weeks or more. Work (Reading, Mass). 2007;29:233–8.

Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Conference Proceeding. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1975.

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRef

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.PubMedCrossRef

Shaw WS, Huang YH. Concerns and expectations about returning to work with low back pain: identifying themes from focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1269–81. doi:10.1080/09638280500076269.PubMedCrossRef

Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal directed behavior: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. J Exper Soc Psych. 1986;22:453–74. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4.CrossRef

Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11:87–98.PubMed

10.

Sutton S. Explaining and predicting intentions and behavior: how well are we doing? J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28:1318–39. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01679.x.CrossRef

11.

Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta–analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:471–99. doi:10.1348/014466601164939.PubMedCrossRef

12.

de Vries H. Determinants of behavior [in Dutch: determinanten van gedrag]. In: Damoiseaux V, van der Molen HT, Kok GJ, editors. Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1993. p. 109–32.

13.

Heymans MW, de Vet HCW, Knol DL, Bongers PM, Koes BW, van Mechelen W. Workers’ beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:685–95. doi:10.1007/s10926-006-9058-8.PubMedCrossRef

14.

van Oostrum SH, Anema JR, Terluin B, Venema A, de Vet HCW, van Mechelen W. Development of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with stress-related mental disorders: intervention mapping as a useful tool. BMC Health Ser Res. 2007;7:127. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-127.CrossRef

15.

Colémant A, van den Broucke S. Determinants of occupational health related behavior in flemish farmers: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J Saf Res. 2008;39:55–64. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2007.12.001.CrossRef

16.

Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:374–92. doi:10.1002/ajim.1112.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Arnetz BB, Sjogren B, Rydehn B, Meisel R. Early workplace intervention for employees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: a prospective controlled intervention study. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:499–506. doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000063628.37065.45.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:557–68. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-8034-z.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Nielsen ML, Rugulies R, Christensen KB, Smith-Hansen L, Kristensen TS. Psychosocial work environment predictors of short and long spells of registered sickness absence during a 2-year follow up. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:591–8. doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000201567.70084.3a.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Faucett J, Blanc PD, Yelin E. The impact of carpal tunnel syndrome on work status: implications of job characteristics for staying on the job. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10:55–9. doi:10.1023/A:1009441828933.CrossRef

21.

Post M, Krol B, Groothoff JW. Work-related determinants of return to work of employees on long-term sickness absence. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):481–8. doi:10.1080/09638280400018601.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Post M, Krol B, Groothoff JW. Health-related determinants of return to work of employees on long-term sickness absence. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(5):289–97. doi:10.1080/09638280500160303.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Warr P, Cook J, Wall T. Scales for the measurement of some work attitude and aspects of psychological well-being. J Occup Psychol. 1979;52:129–48.

24.

Bosscher RJ, Smit JH, Kempen GIJM. Algemene competentieverwachtingen bij ouderen; een onderzoek naar de psychometrische kenmerken van de algemene competentieschaal (ALCOS). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en Haar Grensgebieden. 1997;52:239–48. In Dutch; general competency expectations in elderly; a study into the psychometric properties of the general competency scale.

25.

Scherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychol Rep. 1982;51:663–71.

26.

Woodruff S, Cashman J. Task, domain and general efficacy: a re-examination of the Self-efficacy Scale. Psychol Rep. 1993;72:423–32.

27.

Advanced Models. S.P.S.S. 14.0. Chicago: SPSS; 2005.

28.

Clancy C, Wey J, Guinn G. The effect of patients’ perceptions on return to work after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung. 1984;13(2):173–6.PubMed

29.

Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril W. Predictors of low back pain disability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;221:89–98.PubMed

30.

Gallagher RM, Rauh V, Haugh LD, Milhous R, Callas PW, Langelier R, et al. Determinants of return-to-work among low back pain patients. Pain. 1989;39(1):55–67. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(89)90175-9.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Lacroix JM, Powell J, Lloyd GJ, Doxey NC, Mitson GL, Aldam CF. Low-back pain. Factors of value in predicting outcome. Spine. 1990;15(6):495–9. doi:10.1097/00007632-199006000-00012.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Lötters F, Franche RL. Hogg-Johnsons, Burdorf A, Pole JD. The prognostic value of depressive symptoms, fear-avoidance, and self-efficacy for duration of lost-time benefit in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(12):794–801. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.020420.CrossRef

33.

Lackner JM, Carosella AM, Feuerstein M. Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(1):212–20. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.1.212.CrossRef

34.

Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390–5. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC, Velicer WF, Ginpil S, Norcross JC. Predicting change in smoking status for self-changers. Addict Behav. 1985;10(4):395–406. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(85)90036-X.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Krause N, Ragland DR. Occupational disability due to low back pain: a new interdisciplinary classification based on a phase model of disability. Spine. 1994;19:1011–20. doi:10.1097/00007632-199405000-00002.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Ajzen I. From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action control: from cognition to behaviour. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. p. 11–39.

38.

de Vries H, Dijkstra M, Kuhlman P. Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioral intentions. Health Educ Res. 1988;3:273–82. doi:10.1093/her/3.3.273.CrossRef

Title: Behavioral Determinants as Predictors of Return to Work After Long-Term Sickness Absence: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior
Authors: Sandra Brouwer
Boudien Krol
Michiel F. Reneman
Ute Bültmann
Renée-Louise Franche
Jac J. L. van der Klink
Johan W. Groothoff
Publication date: 01-06-2009
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9172-5

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Behavioral Determinants as Predictors of Return to Work After Long-Term Sickness Absence: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

A Participatory Workplace Intervention for Employees With Distress and Lost Time: A Feasibility Evaluation Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

Health Professional’s Perceptions and Practices in Relation to Functional Capacity Evaluations: Results of a Quantitative Survey

Work-related Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Surgeons

Stuck at the Bottom Rung: Occupational Characteristics of Workers with Disabilities

Gender Differences in Work Modifications and Changed Job Characteristics During the Return-To-Work Process: A Prospective Cohort Study

Margin of Manoeuvre Indicators in the Workplace During the Rehabilitation Process: A Qualitative Analysis