Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2014

01-09-2014

Return to Work Following Breast Cancer Treatment: The Employers’ Side

Authors: Corine Tiedtke, Peter Donceel, Angelique de Rijk, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose Research on employers’ experiences with return to work (RTW) of employees with breast cancer is lacking. Employers seem to be the key people to create good working conditions. Our aim is to explore how Belgian employers experience their role and responsibility in RTW of employees with breast cancer. Methods Using a qualitative design (Grounded Theory) 17 employers from the public (7), private (5) and non-profit (5) sector, directly involved in the RTW process, were interviewed. The analysis was based on the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) with constant data comparison and interactive team dialogue as important guiding characteristics. Results RTW of employees with breast cancer is experienced by employers as an intangible process that is difficult to manage. This was expressed in (1) concern, referring to the employer’s personal and emotional involvement, (2) uncertainty about the course of illness and the guidance needed by the employee and (3) specific dilemmas in the RTW process (when does one infringe on employee privacy; employee vs. organization interest; employers’ personal vs. professional role). The degree to which this was experienced related to variety in organizational, employer, and employee factors. Conclusions The findings of this study confirm the importance of the employer’s involvement in RTW of employees with breast cancer and contribute to a better understanding of its complexity. The employers did their best to grasp the intangibility of the RTW process. Further research is needed to refine these findings and to discover the specific needs of employers regarding supporting RTW of breast cancer patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.PubMedCrossRef Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. 2002;11:24–131.CrossRef Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. 2002;11:24–131.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bouknight R, Bradley C, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:345–53.PubMedCrossRef Bouknight R, Bradley C, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:345–53.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:427–35. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0005-6.PubMedCrossRef Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:427–35. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-005-0005-6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference De Boer A, Taskila T, Ojajarvi A, van Dijk F, Verbeck J. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301:753–62.CrossRef De Boer A, Taskila T, Ojajarvi A, van Dijk F, Verbeck J. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301:753–62.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tiedtke C, Donceel P, Knops L, Désiron H, Dierckx de Casterlé B, De Rijk A. Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: stakeholders’ experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:241–51. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9342-0.PubMedCrossRef Tiedtke C, Donceel P, Knops L, Désiron H, Dierckx de Casterlé B, De Rijk A. Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: stakeholders’ experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:241–51. doi:10.​1007/​s10926-011-9342-0.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Amir Z, Strauser D, Chan F. Employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Work and cancer survivors. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2009. p. 73–89. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72041-8-3. Amir Z, Strauser D, Chan F. Employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Work and cancer survivors. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2009. p. 73–89. doi:10.​1007/​978-0-387-72041-8-3.
15.
go back to reference Holmgren K, Ivanoff S. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93–106.PubMedCrossRef Holmgren K, Ivanoff S. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93–106.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Aas RW, Ellingsen K, Lindøe P, Möller A. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: a content analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:335–46.PubMedCrossRef Aas RW, Ellingsen K, Lindøe P, Möller A. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: a content analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:335–46.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hinman M. Factors influencing work disability for women who have undergone mastectomy. Women Health. 2001;34:45–60.CrossRef Hinman M. Factors influencing work disability for women who have undergone mastectomy. Women Health. 2001;34:45–60.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wrapson W, Mewse A. Supervisor’s responses to sickness certification for an episode of low back pain: employees’ personal experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1728–36.PubMedCrossRef Wrapson W, Mewse A. Supervisor’s responses to sickness certification for an episode of low back pain: employees’ personal experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1728–36.PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:169–81.PubMedCrossRef Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:169–81.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Van Raak A, De Rijk A, Morsa J. Applying new institutional theory: the case of collaboration to promote work resumption after sickness absence. Work Employ Soc. 2005;19:141.CrossRef Van Raak A, De Rijk A, Morsa J. Applying new institutional theory: the case of collaboration to promote work resumption after sickness absence. Work Employ Soc. 2005;19:141.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research 3e: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research 3e: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008.
26.
go back to reference Hoefsmit N, De Rijk A, Houkes I. Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:153.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hoefsmit N, De Rijk A, Houkes I. Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:153.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Maiwald K, Meershoek A, De Rijk AE, Nijhuis FJN. Policy on manager involvement in work re-integration: managers’ experiences in a Canadian setting. Work. 2013 (accepted). Maiwald K, Meershoek A, De Rijk AE, Nijhuis FJN. Policy on manager involvement in work re-integration: managers’ experiences in a Canadian setting. Work. 2013 (accepted).
28.
go back to reference Williams RM, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19:87–93.PubMed Williams RM, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19:87–93.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschmaier M, Steiner JF. A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2005;14:992–1004.PubMedCrossRef Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschmaier M, Steiner JF. A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2005;14:992–1004.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Breast cancer survivors’ views of factors that influence the return-to-work process: a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:144–54. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3199.PubMedCrossRef Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Breast cancer survivors’ views of factors that influence the return-to-work process: a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:144–54. doi:10.​5271/​sjweh.​3199.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Return to Work Following Breast Cancer Treatment: The Employers’ Side
Authors
Corine Tiedtke
Peter Donceel
Angelique de Rijk
Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9465-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2014 Go to the issue