Top

Published in:

01-08-2018 | Original Paper

Why Public Health Researchers Should Consider Using Disability Data from the American Community Survey

Authors: Carlos Siordia, Lori A. Hoepner, Allen N. Lewis

Published in: Journal of Community Health | Issue 4/2018

Abstract

The United States (US) federal government allocates hundreds of billions of dollars to provide resources to Americans with disabilities, older adults, and the poor. The American Community Survey (ACS) influences the distribution of those resources. The specific aim of the project is to introduce health researchers to Public Use Microdata Sample file from 2009 to 2011. The overall goal of our paper is to promote the use of ACS data relevant to disability status. This study provides prevalence estimates of three disability related items for the population at or over the age of 15 years who reside in one of the continental states. When population weights are applied to the 7,198,221 individuals in the sample under analysis, they are said to represent 239,641,088 of their counterparts in the US population. Detailed tabulations by state (provided as Microsoft Excel® spreadsheets in ACS output) clearly show disability prevalence varies from state-to-state. Because analyses of the ACS data have the ability to influence resources aiding individuals with physical mobility challenges, its use should be promoted. Particular attention should be given to monetary allocations which will improve accessibility of the existing built environment for the individuals with mobility impairment.

Available only for authorised users

United States Census Bureau. How disability data are collected from the American Community Survey. Retrieved Jan 11, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/topics/health/disability/guidance/data-collection-acs.html.

Siordia, C. (2014). Number of people in the United States experiencing ambulatory and independent living difficulties. Journal of Social Work and Disability and Rehabilitation, 13(3), 261–267.CrossRef

Southwestern Pennsylvania Public Transit Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from http://www.spcregion.org/pdf/atwichs/FullFinalHSReport.pdf.

Reamer, A. D. (2010). Surveying for dollars: The role of the American Community Survey in the geographic distribution of federal funds. Washington, D.C.: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings.

Herman, E. (2008). The American Community Survey: An introduction to the basics. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 504–519.CrossRef

Siordia, C. (2014). Detecting “real” population changes with American Community Survey data: The implicit assumption of treating between-year differences as “trends”. Journal of Sociological Research, 4(2), 494–509.CrossRef

Siordia, C. (2013). Are health insurance item allocations in the American Community Survey missing completely at random? Journal of Frailty and Aging, 2(4), 198–204.PubMed

Siordia, C. (2015). Disability estimates between same-sex and different-sex couples: Data from the American Community Survey (2009-2011). Sexuality and Disability, 33(1), 107–121.CrossRefPubMed

Siordia, C., & Young, R. L. (2013). Methodological note: Allocation of disability items in the American Community Survey. Disability and Health Journal, 6(2), 149–153.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Siordia, C., & Fox, A. (2013). Public use microdata area fragmentation: Research and policy implications of polygon discontiguity. Spatial Demography, 1(1), 42–56.CrossRef

11.

United States Government Accountability Office. Legal authority for American Community Survey, B-289852, April 4, 2002. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from https://www.gao.gov/decisions/other/289852.htm.

12.

Siordia, C., & Le, V. D. (2013). Precision of disability estimates for southeast asians in the American Community Survey 2008-2010 microdata. Central Asian Journal of Global Health. https://doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2012.2166-7403.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

13.

United States Census Bureau. (2013). Workers with a disability less likely to be employed, more likely to hold jobs with lower earnings, Census Bureau reports. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2013/cb13-47.html.

14.

World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

15.

Siordia, C., & Farias, R. A. (2013). A multilevel analysis on latino’s economic inequality: a test of the minority group threat theory. In R. Verdugo (Ed.), The economic status: Volume of the hispanic population (pp. 65–79). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

16.

Singh, G. K., & Lin, S. C. (2013). Marked ethnic, nativity, and socioeconomic disparities in disability and health insurance among US children and adults: The 2008-2010 American Community Survey. BioMed Research International, 2013, 17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/627412.CrossRef

17.

Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., & Lantz, P. (2009). Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: Findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults (1986-2001). Social Science & Medicine, 69, 964–970.CrossRef

18.

Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., Bader, M., Morenoff, J. D., & House, J. S. (2008). Mobility disability and the built environment. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(5), 506–513.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Botticello, A. L., Rohrbach, T., & Cobbold, N. (2015). Differences in the community built environment influence poor perceived health among persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1583–1590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Sund, T., Iwarsson, S., Anttila, H., & Brandt, A. (2015). Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: A prospective study among people with mobility restrictions. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 7, 859–870.

21.

Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., et al. (2015). Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 578–588.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ripat, J. D., Brown, C. L., & Ethans, K. D. (2015). Barriers to wheelchair use in the winter. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1117–1122.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Bazuin, J. T., & Fraser, J. C. (2013). How the ACS gets it wrong: The story of the American Community Survey and a small, inner city neighborhood. Applied Geography, 45, 292–302.CrossRef

24.

Krahn, G. L., Fujiura, G., Drum, C. E., Cardinal, B. J., & Nosek, M. A. (2009). The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability. Disability and Health Journal, 2(2), 49–56.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tate, R. L. (2014). Measuring outcomes using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) model, with special reference to participation and environmental factors. In H. S. Levin, D. H. K. Shum & R. C. K. Chan (Eds.), Understanding traumatic brain injury: Current research and future directions (pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

26.

McDermott, S., & Turk, M. A. (2011). The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 1–5.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Norwich, B. (2008). Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: international perspectives and future directions. New York, NY: Routledge.

28.

Koutsogeorgou, E., Leonardi, M., Bickenbach, J. E., Cerniauskaite, M., Quintas, R., & Raggi, A. (2014). Social capital, disability, and usefulness of the international classification of functioning, disability and health for the development and monitoring of policy interventions. Disability & Society, 29(7), 1104–1116.CrossRef

29.

Dorsey, R., & Graham, G. (2011). New HHS data standards for race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, and disability status. JAMA, 306(21), 2378–2379.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Office of Minority Health. (2017). Data collection standards for race, ethnicity, primary language, sex, and disability status. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlid=23.

31.

Gibney, K., Sinclair, M., O’Toole, J., et al. (2013). Using disability-adjusted life years to set health-based targets: A novel use of an established burden of disease metric. Journal of Public Health Policy, 34(3), 439–446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Fairchild, A., Rosner, L., Colgrove, D., Bayer, J., Fried, R., L (2010). The EXODUS of public health what history can tell us about the future. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 54–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Why Public Health Researchers Should Consider Using Disability Data from the American Community Survey
Authors: Carlos Siordia
Lori A. Hoepner
Allen N. Lewis
Publication date: 01-08-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Community Health / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0478-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Why Public Health Researchers Should Consider Using Disability Data from the American Community Survey

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Heads Up, Phones Down: A Pedestrian Safety Intervention on Distracted Crosswalk Behavior

Cultural Factors Influencing Osteoarthritis Care in Asian Communities: A Review of the Evidence

Discrimination and Health Among Taxi Drivers in New York and Toronto

Tobacco Control Policy Adoption Dynamics: A Case Study of Missouri Communities

Scope of Knowledge About Zika Among Women in US–Mexico Border Communities

University Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Sources of Information About Zika Virus