Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 2/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Paper

Modern Multi-line Slot Machine Games: The Effect of Lines Wagered on Winners, Losers, Bonuses, and Losses Disguised as Wins

Authors: K. Harrigan, M. Dixon, D. Brown

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

We simulated the commercially available multi-line slot machine game “Money Storm,” including its bonus wins. Our results show that after a specified amount of time (such as 1 or 50 h), when players played a single line, there were marked differences between one player and the next—a few won a lot, others lost far more than average. When playing 20 lines there were fewer big winners and fewer players quickly losing a large percentage of their money. We simulated a Gambler’s Ruin scenario whereby players arrived with $100 and made $1 wagers until broke. Again we saw a reduction in the variability among player as the number of lines wagered increased, fewer players lost their entire bankroll quickly, and fewer players had big wins. The bonus wins in Money Storm contribute approximately 24 % to the payback of the game, and our simulations of bonus wins shows that with 20 lines wagered the players spend approximately 11 % of their time in bonus wins. With one line wagered, there are no losses disguised as wins while with 20 lines wagered the majority of hits are losses disguised as wins. Players using multi-line machines can thus tune the characteristics of the machine gambling experience to match their preferred pattern, though most seem in practice to bet on the most possible lines. Our results serve to inform researchers, counsellors, gamblers and others about how slot machines are designed, and the effect that wagering on multiple lines has on short-term and long-term play, bonus wins, and losses disguised as wins.
Literature
go back to reference Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499.
go back to reference Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the configuration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimisation strategies for problem gambling. A report for the Gaming Industry Operator’s Group. Sydney: University Printing Service. Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the configuration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimisation strategies for problem gambling. A report for the Gaming Industry Operator’s Group. Sydney: University Printing Service.
go back to reference Custer, R. L. (1984). Profile of the pathological gambler. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 45(2), 35–38.PubMed Custer, R. L. (1984). Profile of the pathological gambler. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 45(2), 35–38.PubMed
go back to reference Custer, R. L., & Milt, H. (1985). When luck runs out. New York: Facts on File. Custer, R. L., & Milt, H. (1985). When luck runs out. New York: Facts on File.
go back to reference Dixon, M. J., Harrigan, K. A., Sandhu, R., Collins, K., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105(10), 1819–1824. Dixon, M. J., Harrigan, K. A., Sandhu, R., Collins, K., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105(10), 1819–1824.
go back to reference Dow Schull, N. (2012). Addiction by design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Dow Schull, N. (2012). Addiction by design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference GLS Research (2011). 2010 Clark County residents study: Survey of leisure activities and gaming behavior. A report prepared for the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority. GLS Research (2011). 2010 Clark County residents study: Survey of leisure activities and gaming behavior. A report prepared for the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.
go back to reference Greene, J. (1982). The gambling trap. Psychology Today, 16(9), 50–55. Greene, J. (1982). The gambling trap. Psychology Today, 16(9), 50–55.
go back to reference Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2009). PAR Sheets, probabilities, and slot machine play: Implications for problem and non-problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 23, 81–110.CrossRef Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2009). PAR Sheets, probabilities, and slot machine play: Implications for problem and non-problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 23, 81–110.CrossRef
go back to reference Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2010). Government sanctioned “tight” and “loose” slot machines: How having multiple versions of the same slot machine game may impact problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 159–174.CrossRefPubMed Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2010). Government sanctioned “tight” and “loose” slot machines: How having multiple versions of the same slot machine game may impact problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 159–174.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Haw, J. (2008). Random-ratio schedules of reinforcement: The role of early wins and unreinforced trials. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 56–67.CrossRef Haw, J. (2008). Random-ratio schedules of reinforcement: The role of early wins and unreinforced trials. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 56–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Haw, J. (2009). The multiplier potential of slot machines predicts bet size. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 3(1), 1–6. Haw, J. (2009). The multiplier potential of slot machines predicts bet size. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 3(1), 1–6.
go back to reference Moran, E. (1970). Gambling as a form of dependence. British Journal of Addiction, 64, 419–428.CrossRef Moran, E. (1970). Gambling as a form of dependence. British Journal of Addiction, 64, 419–428.CrossRef
go back to reference Queensland (2002). Office of the Government Statistician & Queensland. Gambling Policy Directorate. Queensland household gambling survey 2001 [electronic resource]: [Web site] Queensland Treasury, Brisbane: http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-51569. Queensland (2002). Office of the Government Statistician & Queensland. Gambling Policy Directorate. Queensland household gambling survey 2001 [electronic resource]: [Web site] Queensland Treasury, Brisbane: http://​nla.​gov.​au/​nla.​arc-51569.
go back to reference Turner, N. (2011). Volatility, house edge, and prize structure of gambling games. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 607–623.CrossRefPubMed Turner, N. (2011). Volatility, house edge, and prize structure of gambling games. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 607–623.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turner, N., Horton, K., & Fritz, B. (2009). The relationship between explicit and implicit learning processes and probable pathological gambling. International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 245–262.CrossRef Turner, N., Horton, K., & Fritz, B. (2009). The relationship between explicit and implicit learning processes and probable pathological gambling. International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 245–262.CrossRef
go back to reference Walker, M. (1992). The psychology of gambling. London: Pergamon Press. Walker, M. (1992). The psychology of gambling. London: Pergamon Press.
Metadata
Title
Modern Multi-line Slot Machine Games: The Effect of Lines Wagered on Winners, Losers, Bonuses, and Losses Disguised as Wins
Authors
K. Harrigan
M. Dixon
D. Brown
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 2/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9436-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Gambling Studies 2/2015 Go to the issue