Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 4/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Paper

Volatility, House Edge and Prize Structure of Gambling Games

Author: Nigel E. Turner

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

This study used simulations to examine the effect of prize structure on the outcome volatility and the number of winners of various game configurations. The two most common prize structures found in gambling games are even money payoff games (bet $1; win $2) found on most table games and multilevel prizes structures found in gambling machine games. Simulations were set up to examine the effect of prize structure on the long-term outcomes of these games. Eight different prize structures were compared in terms of the number of winners and volatility. It was found that the standard table game and commercial gambling machines produced fairly high numbers of short term winners (1 h), but few long term winners (50 h). It was found that the typical even money game set up produced the lowest level of volatility. Of the multilevel prize structures examined, the three simulations based on commercial gambling machines were the least volatile. The results are examined in terms of the pragmatics of game design.
Footnotes
1
Note this assumes a speed of one spin per 6 s. Both the spin rate and house edge estimate are fairly conservative figures. Some machines can be played faster and some machines take a larger house edge.
 
Literature
go back to reference Breen, R. B., & Zimmerman, M. (2002). Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 31–43.PubMedCrossRef Breen, R. B., & Zimmerman, M. (2002). Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 31–43.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cardoza, A. (1997). How to win at gambling. New York: Cardoza Publishing. Cardoza, A. (1997). How to win at gambling. New York: Cardoza Publishing.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Delfabbro, H. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker-machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90(3), 425–439.CrossRef Delfabbro, H. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker-machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90(3), 425–439.CrossRef
go back to reference Dickerson, M. (1996). Why ‘slots’ equals ‘grind’ in any language: The cross-cultural popularity of the slot machine. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Gambling cultures: Studies in history and interpretation (pp. 152–166). London: Routledge. Dickerson, M. (1996). Why ‘slots’ equals ‘grind’ in any language: The cross-cultural popularity of the slot machine. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Gambling cultures: Studies in history and interpretation (pp. 152–166). London: Routledge.
go back to reference Dickerson, M., Hinchy, J., England, S. L., & Fabre, J. (1992). On the determinants of persistent gambling behaviour. I. High frequency poker machine players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 237–248.PubMedCrossRef Dickerson, M., Hinchy, J., England, S. L., & Fabre, J. (1992). On the determinants of persistent gambling behaviour. I. High frequency poker machine players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 237–248.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., & Daugherty, D. (2006). An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 232–236.PubMedCrossRef Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., & Daugherty, D. (2006). An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 232–236.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dorion, J. P., & Nicki, R. M. (2001). Epidemiology of problem gambling in Prince Edward Island: A Canadian microcosm. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 413–417. Dorion, J. P., & Nicki, R. M. (2001). Epidemiology of problem gambling in Prince Edward Island: A Canadian microcosm. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 413–417.
go back to reference Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2004). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.CrossRef Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2004). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Ernkvist, M. (2009). Creating player appeal: Management of technological innovation and changing pattern of industrial leadership in the U.S. gaming machine manufacturing industry, 1965–2005. Goteberg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg. Ernkvist, M. (2009). Creating player appeal: Management of technological innovation and changing pattern of industrial leadership in the U.S. gaming machine manufacturing industry, 1965–2005. Goteberg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
go back to reference Harrigan, K. A. (2007). Slot machine structural characteristics: Distorted player views of payback percentages. Journal of Gambling Issues, (20). Downloaded January 9, 2007, from www.camh.net/egambling. Harrigan, K. A. (2007). Slot machine structural characteristics: Distorted player views of payback percentages. Journal of Gambling Issues, (20). Downloaded January 9, 2007, from www.​camh.​net/​egambling.
go back to reference Haruvy, E., Erev, L., & Sonsino, D. (2001). The medium prizes paradox: Evidence from a simulated casino. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22(3), 251–261.CrossRef Haruvy, E., Erev, L., & Sonsino, D. (2001). The medium prizes paradox: Evidence from a simulated casino. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22(3), 251–261.CrossRef
go back to reference IGT. (2009). Slotline. Show Edition, November 2009. Nevada: IGT. IGT. (2009). Slotline. Show Edition, November 2009. Nevada: IGT.
go back to reference Kilby, J., Fox, J., & Lucas, A. F. (2004). Casino operations management (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Kilby, J., Fox, J., & Lucas, A. F. (2004). Casino operations management (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Mizerski, D., Jolley, B., & Mizerski, K. (2002). Disputing the “crack cocaine of gambling” label for electronic gaming machines. Paper presented at the National Association for Gambling Studies, Sydney. Mizerski, D., Jolley, B., & Mizerski, K. (2002). Disputing the “crack cocaine of gambling” label for electronic gaming machines. Paper presented at the National Association for Gambling Studies, Sydney.
go back to reference Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Report no. 10. Canberra, Australia: AusInfo. Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Report no. 10. Canberra, Australia: AusInfo.
go back to reference Schull, N. D. (2005). Digital gambling: The coincidence of desire and design. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 65–81.CrossRef Schull, N. D. (2005). Digital gambling: The coincidence of desire and design. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 65–81.CrossRef
go back to reference Turner, N. E., & Ferentzy, P. (2010). The natural life history of a lottery: The importance of large wins in the establishment and survival of a lottery. International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 19–30.CrossRef Turner, N. E., & Ferentzy, P. (2010). The natural life history of a lottery: The importance of large wins in the establishment and survival of a lottery. International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 19–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Turner, N. E., & Horbay, R. (2003). Doubling revisited: The mathematical and psychological effect of betting strategy. Gambling Research, 15, 16–34. Turner, N. E., & Horbay, R. (2003). Doubling revisited: The mathematical and psychological effect of betting strategy. Gambling Research, 15, 16–34.
go back to reference Urbanoski, K. A., & Rush, B. R. (2006). Characteristics of people seeking treatment for problem gambling in Ontario: Trends from 1998–2002. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 16, 77–97 [Online]. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from www.camh.net/egambling/issue16. Urbanoski, K. A., & Rush, B. R. (2006). Characteristics of people seeking treatment for problem gambling in Ontario: Trends from 1998–2002. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 16, 77–97 [Online]. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from www.​camh.​net/​egambling/​issue16.
go back to reference Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50. Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50.
Metadata
Title
Volatility, House Edge and Prize Structure of Gambling Games
Author
Nigel E. Turner
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 4/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9238-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of Gambling Studies 4/2011 Go to the issue