Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Research

Bilingual Cancer Genetic Education Modules for the Deaf Community: Development and Evaluation of the Online Video Material

Authors: Patrick Boudreault, Alicia Wolfson, Barbara Berman, Vickie L. Venne, Janet S. Sinsheimer, Christina Palmer

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Health information about inherited forms of cancer and the role of family history in cancer risk for the American Sign Language (ASL) Deaf community, a linguistic and cultural community, needs improvement. Cancer genetic education materials available in English print format are not accessible for many sign language users because English is not their native or primary language. Per Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, the level of literacy for printed health education materials should not be higher than 6th grade level (~ 11 to 12 years old), and even with this recommendation, printed materials are still not accessible to sign language users or other nonnative English speakers. Genetic counseling is becoming an integral part of healthcare, but often ASL users are not considered when health education materials are developed. As a result, there are few genetic counseling materials available in ASL. Online tools such as video and closed captioning offer opportunities for educators and genetic counselors to provide digital access to genetic information in ASL to the Deaf community. The Deaf Genetics Project team used a bilingual approach to develop a 37-min interactive Cancer Genetics Education Module (CGEM) video in ASL with closed captions and quizzes, and demonstrated that this approach resulted in greater cancer genetic knowledge and increased intentions to obtain counseling or testing, compared to standard English text information (Palmer et al., Disability and Health Journal, 10(1):23–32, 2017). Though visually enhanced educational materials have been developed for sign language users with multimodal/lingual approach, little is known about design features that can accommodate a diverse audience of sign language users so the material is engaging to a wide audience. The main objectives of this paper are to describe the development of the CGEM and to determine if viewer demographic characteristics are associated with two measurable aspects of CGEM viewing behavior: (1) length of time spent viewing and (2) number of pause, play, and seek events. These objectives are important to address, especially for Deaf individuals because the amount of simultaneous content (video, print) requires cross-modal cognitive processing of visual and textual materials. The use of technology and presentational strategies is needed that enhance and not interfere with health learning in this population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Barnett, S., McKee, M., Smith, S. R., & Pearson, T. A. (2011). Deaf sign language users, health inequities, and public health: opportunity for social justice. Preventing Chronic Disease, 8(2), A45.PubMedPubMedCentral Barnett, S., McKee, M., Smith, S. R., & Pearson, T. A. (2011). Deaf sign language users, health inequities, and public health: opportunity for social justice. Preventing Chronic Disease, 8(2), A45.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Boudrealt, P. (2006). Language and identity: a quantitative study of American Sign Language grammatical competency and deaf identity through online technology. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba. Boudrealt, P. (2006). Language and identity: a quantitative study of American Sign Language grammatical competency and deaf identity through online technology. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.
go back to reference Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R. I. (2006). Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 608–635.CrossRef Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R. I. (2006). Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 608–635.CrossRef
go back to reference Boudreault, P., Baldwin, E. E., Fox, M., Dutton, L., Tullis, L., Linden, J., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2010). Deaf adults’ reasons for genetic testing depend on cultural affiliation: results from a prospective, longitudinal genetic counseling and testing study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 209–227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boudreault, P., Baldwin, E. E., Fox, M., Dutton, L., Tullis, L., Linden, J., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2010). Deaf adults’ reasons for genetic testing depend on cultural affiliation: results from a prospective, longitudinal genetic counseling and testing study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 209–227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Simply put: a guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Simply put: a guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
go back to reference Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.CrossRef Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Hauser, P. C., O’Hearn, A., McKee, M., Steider, A., & Thew, D. (2010). Deaf spistemology: deafhood and deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 486–492.CrossRefPubMed Hauser, P. C., O’Hearn, A., McKee, M., Steider, A., & Thew, D. (2010). Deaf spistemology: deafhood and deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 486–492.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Howison, J., Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 2.CrossRef Howison, J., Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 2.CrossRef
go back to reference Humphries, T., & MacDougall, F. (1999). “Chaining” and other links: making connections between American Sign Language and English in two types of school settings. Visual Anthropology Review, 15, 84–94.CrossRef Humphries, T., & MacDougall, F. (1999). “Chaining” and other links: making connections between American Sign Language and English in two types of school settings. Visual Anthropology Review, 15, 84–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. R. (2012). Language acquisition for deaf children: reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal, 9, 16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. R. (2012). Language acquisition for deaf children: reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal, 9, 16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Jones, E. G., Mallinson, R. K., Phillips, L., & Kang, Y. (2006). Challenges in language, culture, and modality: translating English measures into American Sign Language. Nursing Research, 55(2), 75–81.CrossRefPubMed Jones, E. G., Mallinson, R. K., Phillips, L., & Kang, Y. (2006). Challenges in language, culture, and modality: translating English measures into American Sign Language. Nursing Research, 55(2), 75–81.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Karchmer, M. A., & Mitchell, R. E. (2003). Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 21–37). New York: Oxford University Press. Karchmer, M. A., & Mitchell, R. E. (2003). Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 21–37). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Meier, R., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (2002). Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Meier, R., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (2002). Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference McInnes, N., & Haglund, B. J. A. (2011). Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 36(4), 173–189.CrossRefPubMed McInnes, N., & Haglund, B. J. A. (2011). Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 36(4), 173–189.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McKee, M. M., Paasche-Orlow, M., Winters, P. C., Fiscella, K., Zazove, P., Sen, A., & Pearson, T. (2015). Assessing health literacy in Deaf American Sign Language users. Journal of Health Communication, 20(2), 92–100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McKee, M. M., Paasche-Orlow, M., Winters, P. C., Fiscella, K., Zazove, P., Sen, A., & Pearson, T. (2015). Assessing health literacy in Deaf American Sign Language users. Journal of Health Communication, 20(2), 92–100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Mitchell, R. E. (2006). How many deaf people are there in the United States? Estimates from the survey of income and program participation. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 112-119, 1. Mitchell, R. E. (2006). How many deaf people are there in the United States? Estimates from the survey of income and program participation. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 112-119, 1.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute Office of Communications. (2001). Making health communication programs work: a planner’s guide. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Office of Cancer Communications, National Cancer Institute. National Cancer Institute Office of Communications. (2001). Making health communication programs work: a planner’s guide. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Office of Cancer Communications, National Cancer Institute.
go back to reference Neuhauser, L., & Kreps, G. L. (2008). Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Education and Counseling, 71(3), 365–377.CrossRefPubMed Neuhauser, L., & Kreps, G. L. (2008). Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Education and Counseling, 71(3), 365–377.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Palmer, C. G., Boudreault, P., Berman, B. A., Wolfson, A., Duarte, L., Venne, V. L., & Sinsheimer, J. S. (2017). Bilingual approach to online cancer genetics education for deaf American Sign Language users produces greater knowledge and confidence than English text only: a ranodomized study. Disability and Health Journal, 10(1), 23–32.CrossRefPubMed Palmer, C. G., Boudreault, P., Berman, B. A., Wolfson, A., Duarte, L., Venne, V. L., & Sinsheimer, J. S. (2017). Bilingual approach to online cancer genetics education for deaf American Sign Language users produces greater knowledge and confidence than English text only: a ranodomized study. Disability and Health Journal, 10(1), 23–32.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pollard, R. Q., Dean, R. K., O’Hearn, A., & Haynes, S. L. (2009). Adapting health education material for deaf audiences. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(2), 232–238.CrossRefPubMed Pollard, R. Q., Dean, R. K., O’Hearn, A., & Haynes, S. L. (2009). Adapting health education material for deaf audiences. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(2), 232–238.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Safeer, R. S., & Keenan, J. (2005). Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. American Family Physician, 72(3), 463–468.PubMed Safeer, R. S., & Keenan, J. (2005). Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. American Family Physician, 72(3), 463–468.PubMed
go back to reference Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: MIT Press. Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edition: national norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4), 337–348.CrossRefPubMed Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edition: national norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4), 337–348.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zazove, P., Meader, H. E., Reed, B. D., & Gorenflo, D. W. (2013). Deaf persons’ English reading levels and associations with epidemiological, educational, and cultural factors. Journal of Health Communication, 18(7), 760–772.CrossRefPubMed Zazove, P., Meader, H. E., Reed, B. D., & Gorenflo, D. W. (2013). Deaf persons’ English reading levels and associations with epidemiological, educational, and cultural factors. Journal of Health Communication, 18(7), 760–772.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Bilingual Cancer Genetic Education Modules for the Deaf Community: Development and Evaluation of the Online Video Material
Authors
Patrick Boudreault
Alicia Wolfson
Barbara Berman
Vickie L. Venne
Janet S. Sinsheimer
Christina Palmer
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0188-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2018 Go to the issue