Top

Published in:

01-10-2017 | Original Research

Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer

Authors: G Cicero, R De Luca, P Dorangricchia, G Lo Coco, C Guarnaccia, D Fanale, V Calò, A Russo

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 5/2017

Abstract

Oncological Genetic Counselling (CGO) allows the identification of a genetic component that increases the risk of developing a cancer. Individuals’ psychological reactions are influenced by both the content of the received information and the subjective perception of their own risk of becoming ill or being a carrier of a genetic mutation. This study included 120 participants who underwent genetic counselling for breast and/or ovarian cancer. The aim of the study was to examine the relation between their cancer risk perception and the genetic risk during CGO before receiving genetic test results, considering the influence of some psychological variables, in particular distress, anxiety and depression. Participants completed the following tools during a psychological interview: a socio-demographic form, Cancer Risk Perception (CRP) and Genetic Risk Perception (GRP), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Distress Thermometer (DT). The data seem to confirm our hypothesis. Positive and significant correlations were found between the observed variables. Moreover, genetic risk perception determined an increase in depressive symptomatology and cancer risk perception led to an increase in anxious symptomatology, specifically in participants during cancer treatment. The present results suggest the importance of assessing genetic and cancer risk perception in individuals who undergo CGO, to identify those who are at risk of a decrease in psychological well-being and of developing greater psychological distress.

Borreani, C., Manoukian, S., Bianchi, E., Brunelli, C., Peissel, B., Caruso, A., et al. (2014). The psychological impact of breast and ovarian cancer preventive option in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Clinical Genetics, 85, 7–15.CrossRefPubMed

Braithwaite, D., Emery, J., Walter, F., Prevost, A. T., & Sutton, S. (2006). Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Familial Cancer, 5(1), 61–75.CrossRefPubMed

Cabrera, E., Blanco, I., Yagu, C., & Zabalegui, A. (2010). The impact of genetic counseling on knowledge and emotional responses in Spanish population with family history of breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 78, 382–388.CrossRefPubMed

Catania, C., Feroce, I., Barile, M., Goldhirsch, A., De Pas, T., de Braud, F., et al. (2016). Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires -an Italian exploratory study. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 142(3), 633–648.CrossRefPubMed

Christie, J., Quinn G.P., Malo T., Lee, J. H., Zhao, X., Mclntyre, J. et al. (2012). Cognitive and psychological impact of BRCA genetic counseling in before and after definitive surgery breast cancer patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology; 19:(13), 4003–4011.

Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Denayer, L., Decruyenaere, M., Boogaerts, A., Philippe, K., et al. (2005). Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(5), 349–363.CrossRefPubMed

Contegiacomo, A., Pensabene, M., Capuano, I., Tauchmanova, L., Federico, M., Turchetti, D., et al. (2004). An oncologist-based model of cancer genetic counselling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Annals of Oncology, 15, 726–732.CrossRefPubMed

Costantini, M., Musso, M., Viterbori, P., Bonci, F., Del Mastro, L., Garrone, O., et al. (1999). Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Support Care Cancer, 7, 121–127.CrossRefPubMed

Coyne, J. C., Benazon, N. R., Gaba, C. G., Calzone, K., & Weber, B. L. (2000). Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 864.CrossRefPubMed

Cull, A., Fry, A., Rush, R., & Steel, C. M. (2001). Cancer risk perceptions and distress among women attending a familial. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Genetic Counselling on Risk Perception Accuracy ovarian cancer clinic. British Journal of Cancer, 84, 594–599.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Culver, J. O., Brinkerhoff, C. D., Clague, J., Yang, K., Singh, K. E., Sand, S. R., & Witzel, J. N. (2013). Variant of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress. Clinical Genetics, 84(5), 464–472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Di Gaudio, F., Calò, V., La Paglia, L., Bruno, L., Di Piazza, F., Cicero, G., et al. (2012). What are cancer risks in BRCA carriers aport from those regarding the breast and the ovary? Current Women’s Health Reviews, 8(1), 65–71.CrossRef

Dieng, M., Watts, C. G., Kasperian, A. N., Morton, R. L., Mann, G. J., & Cust, A. E. (2014). Improving subjective perception of personal cancer risk: systematic review and meta-analysis of educational interventions for people with cancer or at high risk of cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 23(6), 613–625.CrossRefPubMed

Elwyn, G., & Miron-Shatz, T. (2010). Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expectations, 13(2), 139–147.CrossRefPubMed

Gil, F., Grassi, L., Travado, L., & Tomamichel, M. (2005). Use of distress and depression thermometer to measure psychological morbidity among southern European cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 13(8), 600–606.CrossRefPubMed

Godino, L., Razzaboni, E., Bianconi, M., & Turchetti, D. (2016). Impact of genetic counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer in Italy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(2), 405–411.CrossRefPubMed

Gopie, J. P., Vasen, H. F., & Tibben, A. (2012). Surveillance for hereditary cancer: does he benefit outweigh the psychological burder? – a systematic review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 83, 329–340.CrossRefPubMed

Halpern, S. D. (2012). Shaping end-of-life care: behavioral economics and advance directives. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 33(4), 393–400.CrossRefPubMed

Heshka, J. T., Palleschi, C., Howley, H., Wilson, B., & Wells, P. S. (2008). A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 10(1), 19–32.CrossRefPubMed

Leblond, D., Brédart, A., Dolbeault, S., De Pauw, A., Stoppa, L. D., Flahault, C., et al. (2011). Cognitive, emotional and behavioral impact of an uncertain outcome after study of BRCA1/2: review of the literature. Bulletin du Cancer, 98(2), 184–198.PubMed

Lerman, C., Croyle, R. T., Tercyak, K. P., & Hamann, H. (2002). Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 784–797.CrossRefPubMed

Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., Kaplan, R. L., & Safer, M. A. (2012). Accuracy and artifact: reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 584–605.CrossRefPubMed

Meiser, B. (2005). Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology, 14(12), 1060–1074.CrossRefPubMed

Morasso, G., Costantini, M., Di Leo, S., Roma, S., Miccinesi, G., Merlo, D. F., et al. (2008). End of life care in Italy: personal experience of family caregivers. A content analysis of open questions from the Italian Survey of the Dying of Cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 17, 1073–1080.CrossRefPubMed

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2016) Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professional/physician_gts/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf. Accessed September 3, 2015.

Peters, S. A., Laham, S. M., Pachter, N., & Winship, I. M. (2014). The future in clinical genetics: affective forecasting biases in patient and clinician decision making. Clinical Genetics, 85(4), 312–317.CrossRefPubMed

Pieterse, A. H., Van Dulmen, A. M., Beemer, F. A., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. (2007). Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees’ post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 85–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rantala, J., Platten, U., & Lindgren, G. (2009). Risk perception after genetic counselling in patients with increased risk of cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract, 7, 15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennet, R., Blum, S., Hahn, E. S., Strecker, M., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counselling: notional Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRefPubMed

Smerecnik, C. M., Mesters, I., Verweij, E., de Vries, N. K., & de Vries, H. (2009). A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(3), 217–228.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, A. W., Dougall, A. L., Polsluszny, D. M., Somers, T. J., Rubistein, W. S., & Baum, A. (2008). Psychological distress and quality of life associated with genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Psycho-Oncology, 2008(17), 767–773.CrossRef

Tong, A., Kelly, S., Nusbaum, R., Graves, K., Peshkin, B. N., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., et al. (2015). Intentions for risk-reducing surgery among high-risk women referred for BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic counselling. Psycho-Oncology, 24(1), 33–39.CrossRefPubMed

Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Grumet, S., et al. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counselling: recommendations of the National Society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 83–114.CrossRefPubMed

Voorwinden, S., & Jaspers, P. C. (2016). Prognostic factors for distress after genetic testing for hereditary cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25, 495. doi:10.1007/s10897-015-9894-9.CrossRefPubMed

Wevers, M. R., Ausems, M. G., Verhoef, S., Bleiker, E. M., Hahn, D. E., Brouwer, T., et al. (2015). Does rapid genetic counselling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients cause additional psychosocial distress? Results from a randomized clinical trial. Genetics in Medicine, 18(2), 137–144.CrossRefPubMed

Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer
Authors: G Cicero
R De Luca
P Dorangricchia
G Lo Coco
C Guarnaccia
D Fanale
V Calò
A Russo
Publication date: 01-10-2017
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0072-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling

Pediatric Predispositional Genetic Risk Communication: Potential Utility for Prevention and Control of Melanoma Risk as an Exemplar

Seekers, Finders, Settlers, and Stumblers: Identifying the Career Paths of Males in the Genetic Counseling Profession

Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study

Genetic Counseling for Alcohol Addiction: Assessing Perceptions and Potential Utility in Individuals with Lived Experience and Their Family Members

Translation and Adaptation of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) for Use in Denmark