Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Research

Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases

Authors: Lotte Krabbenborg, L. E. L. M. Vissers, J. Schieving, T. Kleefstra, E. J. Kamsteeg, J. A. Veltman, M. A. Willemsen, S. Van der Burg

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2016

Abstract

The use of whole exome sequencing (WES) for diagnostics of children with rare genetic diseases raises questions about best practices in genetic counselling. While a lot of attention is now given to pre-test counselling procedures for WES, little is known about how parents experience the (positive, negative, or inconclusive) WES results in daily life. To fill this knowledge gap, data were gathered through in-depth interviews with parents of 15 children who underwent WES analysis. WES test results, like results from other genetic tests, evoked relief as well as worries, irrespective of the type of result. Advantages of obtaining a conclusive diagnosis included becoming more accepting towards the situation, being enabled to attune care to the needs of the child, and better coping with feelings of guilt. Disadvantages experienced included a loss of hope for recovery, and a loss by parents of their social network of peers and the effort necessary to re-establish that social network. While parents with conclusive diagnoses were able to re-establish a peer community with the help of social media, parents receiving a possible diagnosis experienced hurdles in seeking peer support, as peers still needed to be identified. These types of psychosocial effects of WES test results for parents are important to take into account for the development of successful genetic counselling strategies.

One interview was carried out by author SvdB

Appelbaum, P. S., Waldman, C. R., Fyer, A., Klitzman, R., Parens, E., Martinez, J., Price W. N., 2nd., & Chung, W. K. (2014). Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(5), 367–373.

Boeije, H. (2012). Analyseren in Kwalitatief Onderzoek. Denken en Doen. The Hague: Boom Lemma.

Bosma, A. R., Rigter, T., Weinreich, S. S., Cornel, M. C., & Henneman, L. (2015). A genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): experiences of patients and family members. Diabetic Medicine. doi:10.111/dme.12742.PubMed

Brooks-Howell, L. C. (2006). Living without labels: the interactional management of diagnostic uncertainty in the genetic counselling clinic. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 3080–3091.CrossRef

Carmichael, N., Tsipis, J., Windmueller, G., Mandel, L., & Estrella, E. (2015). “Is it going to hurt?”: the impact of the diagnostic odyssey on children and their families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 325–335.CrossRefPubMed

De Ligt, J., Willemsen, M. H., van Bon, B. W., Kleefstra, T., Yntema, H. G., Kroes, T., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., Koolen, D. A., de Vries, P., Gillisen, C., del Rosario, M., Hoischen, A., Scheffer, H., de Vries, B. B., Brunner, H. G., Veltman, J. A., & Vissers, L. E. (2012). Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 367, 1921–1929.CrossRefPubMed

Eisenberg, L. (1977). Disesase and illness: distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1, 9–23.CrossRefPubMed

Evers, J. (red) (2007). Qualitative interviewing: art and skill (in Dutch). The Hague: Boom Lemma.

Fanos, J. H. (2012). New “first families”: the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies. Genetics in Medicine, 14(2), 189–190.CrossRefPubMed

Graungaard, A. H., & Skov, L. (2006). Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents’ experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 296–307.

Hallberg, U., Óskarsdóttir, S., & Klingberg, G. (2010). 22q11 deletion syndrome – the meaning of a diagnosis. A qualitative study on parental perspectives. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(5), 719–725.

Hitch, K., Galen, J., Guiltinan, J., Kianmahd, J., Youngblom, J., & Blanco, A. (2014). Lynch syndrome patients’ views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 539–551.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hofmann, B. (2002). On the triad disease, illness and sickness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(6), 651–673.CrossRefPubMed

Iglesias, A. J., Anyane-Yeboa, K., Wynn, J., Wilson, A., Truitt Cho, M., Guzman, E., Sisson, R., Egan, C., & Chung, W. K. (2014). The usefulness of whole-exome sequencing in routine clinical practice. Genetics in Medicine, 16, 922–933.CrossRefPubMed

Krabbenborg, L., Schieving, J., Kleefstra, T., Vissers, L. E. L. M., Willemsen, M. A., Veltman, J. A., & van der Burg, S. (2015). Evaluating a counselling strategy for diagnostic WES in paediatric neurology: an exploration of parents’ information and communication needs. Clinical Genetics, 89(2), 244–250.CrossRefPubMed

Levenseller, B. L., Soucier, D. J., Miller, V. A., Harris, D., Conway, L., & Bernhardt, B. A. (2013). Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 552–565.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Navon, D. (2012). Genetic counseling, activism, and ‘genotype –first’ diagnosis of developmental disorders. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 770–776.CrossRefPubMed

Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?” uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine, 14(2), 250–258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rigter, T., Van Aart, C. J. A., Elting, M. W., Waisfisz, Q., Cornel, M. C., & Henneman, L. (2013). Informed consent for exome sequencing in diagnostics. Clinical Genetics, 85, 417–422.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Roche, M. I., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2014). Next generation genetic counselling: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 439–444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sapp, J. C., Dong, D., Stark, C., Ivey, L. E., Hooker, G., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2013). Parental attitudes, values and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children. Clinical Genetics, 85, 120–126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Skirton, H. (2001). The client’s perspective of genetic counselling: a grounded theory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(4), 311–329.CrossRefPubMed

Tabor, H. K., Stock, J., Brazg, T., McMillin, J., Dent, K. M., Yu, J. H., Shendure, J., & Bamshad, M. J. (2012). Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 158A, 1310–1319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.CrossRefPubMed

Vissers, L. E., de Ligt, J., Gillissen, C., Janssen, I., Steehouwer, M., de Vries, P., van Lier, B., Arts, P., Wieskamp, N., del Rosario, M., van Bon, B. W., Hoischen, A., de Vries, B. B., Brunner, H. G., & Veltman, J. A. (2010). A de novo paradigm for mental retardation. Nature Genetics, 42(12), 1109–1112.CrossRefPubMed

Webb, C. L. (2005). Parents’ perspectives on coping with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31(4), 385–396.

Whitmarsh, I., Davis, A. M., Skinner, D., & Bailey, D. B. (2007). A place for genetic uncertainty: parents valuing an unknown in the meaning of disease. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1082–1093.CrossRef

Title: Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases
Authors: Lotte Krabbenborg
L. E. L. M. Vissers
J. Schieving
T. Kleefstra
E. J. Kamsteeg
J. A. Veltman
M. A. Willemsen
S. Van der Burg
Publication date: 01-12-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9958-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Presented Abstracts from the Thirty Fifth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Seattle, WA, September 2016)

Bicuspid Aortic Valve: a Review with Recommendations for Genetic Counseling

Why Do Parents Want to Know their Child’s Carrier Status? A Qualitative Study

Student-Athletes’ Views on APOE Genotyping for Increased Risk of Poor Recovery after a Traumatic Brain Injury

The Impact of Angelina Jolie (AJ)’s Story on Genetic Referral and Testing at an Academic Cancer Centre in Canada

Erratum to: Using ApoE Genotyping to Promote Healthy Lifestyles in Finland – Psychological Impacts: Randomized Controlled Trial