Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2014

01-08-2014 | Next Generation Genetic Counseling

Traditional Roles in a Non-Traditional Setting: Genetic Counseling in Precision Oncology

Authors: Jessica N. Everett, Shanna L. Gustafson, Victoria M. Raymond

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Next generation sequencing technology is increasingly utilized in oncology with the goal of targeting therapeutics to improve response and reduce side effects. Interpretation of tumor mutations requires sequencing of paired germline DNA, raising questions about incidental germline findings. We describe our experiences as part of a research team implementing a protocol for whole genome sequencing (WGS) of tumors and paired germline DNA known as the Michigan Oncology Sequencing project (MI-ONCOSEQ) that includes options for receiving incidental germline findings. Genetic counselors (GCs) discuss options for return of results with patients during the informed consent process and document family histories. GCs also review germline findings and actively participate in the multi-disciplinary Precision Medicine Tumor Board (PMTB), providing clinical context for interpretation of germline results and making recommendations about disclosure of germline findings. GCs have encountered ethical and counseling challenges with participants, described here. Although GCs have not been traditionally involved in molecular testing of tumors, our experiences with MI-ONCOSEQ demonstrate that GCs have important applicable skills to contribute to multi-disciplinary care teams implementing precision oncology. Broader use of WGS in oncology treatment decision making and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendations for active interrogation of germline tissue in tumor-normal dyads suggests that GCs will have future opportunities in this area outside of research settings.
Literature
go back to reference Berg, J. S., Adams, M., Nassar, N., Bizon, C., Lee, K., Schmitt, C. P., et al. (2013). An informatics approach to analyzing the incidentalome. Genetics in Medicine, 15(1), 36–44.CrossRef Berg, J. S., Adams, M., Nassar, N., Bizon, C., Lee, K., Schmitt, C. P., et al. (2013). An informatics approach to analyzing the incidentalome. Genetics in Medicine, 15(1), 36–44.CrossRef
go back to reference Bombard, Y., Robson, M., & Offit, K. (2013). Revealing the incidentalome when targeting the tumor genome. JAMA, 310(8), 795–796.CrossRef Bombard, Y., Robson, M., & Offit, K. (2013). Revealing the incidentalome when targeting the tumor genome. JAMA, 310(8), 795–796.CrossRef
go back to reference Catt, S., Langridge, C., Fallowfield, L., Talbot, D. C., & Jenkins, V. (2011). Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer, 47(10), 1490–1497.CrossRef Catt, S., Langridge, C., Fallowfield, L., Talbot, D. C., & Jenkins, V. (2011). Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer, 47(10), 1490–1497.CrossRef
go back to reference Dancey, J. E., Bedard, P. L., Onetto, N., & Hudson, T. J. (2012). The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell, 148(3), 409–420.CrossRef Dancey, J. E., Bedard, P. L., Onetto, N., & Hudson, T. J. (2012). The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell, 148(3), 409–420.CrossRef
go back to reference Daugherty, C., Ratain, M. J., Grochowski, E., Stocking, C., Kodish, E., Mick, R., et al. (1995). Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13(5), 1062–1072.CrossRef Daugherty, C., Ratain, M. J., Grochowski, E., Stocking, C., Kodish, E., Mick, R., et al. (1995). Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13(5), 1062–1072.CrossRef
go back to reference Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., et al. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7), 565–574.CrossRef Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., et al. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7), 565–574.CrossRef
go back to reference Halpern, S. D., Ubel, P. A., & Asch, D. A. (2007). Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(13), 1340–1344.CrossRef Halpern, S. D., Ubel, P. A., & Asch, D. A. (2007). Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(13), 1340–1344.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnston, J. J., Rubinstein, W. S., Facio, F. M., Ng, D., Singh, L. N., Teer, J. K., et al. (2012). Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 91(1), 97–108.CrossRef Johnston, J. J., Rubinstein, W. S., Facio, F. M., Ng, D., Singh, L. N., Teer, J. K., et al. (2012). Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 91(1), 97–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Mand, C., Gillam, L., Delatycki, M. B., & Duncan, R. E. (2012). Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(9), 519–524.CrossRef Mand, C., Gillam, L., Delatycki, M. B., & Duncan, R. E. (2012). Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(9), 519–524.CrossRef
go back to reference Mazoyer, S., Dunning, A. M., Serova, O., Dearden, J., Puget, N., Healey, C. S., et al. (1996). A polymorphic stop codon in BRCA2. Nature Genetics, 14(3), 253–254.CrossRef Mazoyer, S., Dunning, A. M., Serova, O., Dearden, J., Puget, N., Healey, C. S., et al. (1996). A polymorphic stop codon in BRCA2. Nature Genetics, 14(3), 253–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Nickel, P. J. (2006). Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27(3), 245–264.CrossRef Nickel, P. J. (2006). Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27(3), 245–264.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Neill, S. M., Peters, J. A., Vogel, V. G., Feingold, E., & Rubinstein, W. S. (2006). Referral to cancer genetic counseling: are there stages of readiness? American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 221–231.CrossRef O’Neill, S. M., Peters, J. A., Vogel, V. G., Feingold, E., & Rubinstein, W. S. (2006). Referral to cancer genetic counseling: are there stages of readiness? American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 221–231.CrossRef
go back to reference Pellegrini, I., Rapti, M., Extra, J. M., Petri-Cal, A., Apostolidis, T., Ferrero, J. M., et al. (2012). Targeted chemotherapy for breast cancer: patients perception of the use of tumor gene profiling approaches to better adapt treatments. Medical Science (Paris), 28 Spec No 1, 24–27. Pellegrini, I., Rapti, M., Extra, J. M., Petri-Cal, A., Apostolidis, T., Ferrero, J. M., et al. (2012). Targeted chemotherapy for breast cancer: patients perception of the use of tumor gene profiling approaches to better adapt treatments. Medical Science (Paris), 28 Spec No 1, 24–27.
go back to reference Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. (1995). American Journal of Human Genetics, 57(5), 1233–1241. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. (1995). American Journal of Human Genetics, 57(5), 1233–1241.
go back to reference Richman, A. R., Tzeng, J. P., Carey, L. A., Retel, V. P., & Brewer, N. T. (2011). Knowledge of genomic testing among early-stage breast cancer patients. Psychooncology, 20(1), 28–35.CrossRef Richman, A. R., Tzeng, J. P., Carey, L. A., Retel, V. P., & Brewer, N. T. (2011). Knowledge of genomic testing among early-stage breast cancer patients. Psychooncology, 20(1), 28–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Roychowdhury, S., Iyer, M. K., Robinson, D. R., Lonigro, R. J., Wu, Y. M., Cao, X., et al. (2011). Personalized oncology through integrative high-throughput sequencing: a pilot study. Science Translational Medicine, 3(111), 111ra121.CrossRef Roychowdhury, S., Iyer, M. K., Robinson, D. R., Lonigro, R. J., Wu, Y. M., Cao, X., et al. (2011). Personalized oncology through integrative high-throughput sequencing: a pilot study. Science Translational Medicine, 3(111), 111ra121.CrossRef
go back to reference Seidenfeld, J., Horstmann, E., Emanuel, E. J., & Grady, C. (2008). Participants in phase 1 oncology research trials: are they vulnerable? Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(1), 16–20.CrossRef Seidenfeld, J., Horstmann, E., Emanuel, E. J., & Grady, C. (2008). Participants in phase 1 oncology research trials: are they vulnerable? Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(1), 16–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Sharaf, R. N., Myer, P., Stave, C. D., Diamond, L. C., & Ladabaum, U. (2013). Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 11(9), 1093–1100.CrossRef Sharaf, R. N., Myer, P., Stave, C. D., Diamond, L. C., & Ladabaum, U. (2013). Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 11(9), 1093–1100.CrossRef
go back to reference Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., & Malviya, S. (2003). Do they understand? (part I): parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology, 98(3), 603–608.CrossRef Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., & Malviya, S. (2003). Do they understand? (part I): parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology, 98(3), 603–608.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Traditional Roles in a Non-Traditional Setting: Genetic Counseling in Precision Oncology
Authors
Jessica N. Everett
Shanna L. Gustafson
Victoria M. Raymond
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9698-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2014 Go to the issue