Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2023

Open Access 21-06-2022 | Blood Pressure Measurement | Original Research

A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter

Authors: G. Hofmann, M. Proença, J. Degott, G. Bonnier, A. Lemkaddem, M. Lemay, R. Schorer, U. Christen, J.-F. Knebel, P. Schoettker

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Smartphones may provide a highly available access to simplified hypertension screening in environments with limited health care resources. Most studies involving smartphone blood pressure (BP) apps have focused on validation in static conditions without taking into account intraindividual BP variations. We report here the first experimental evidence of smartphone-derived BP estimation compared to an arterial catheter in a highly dynamic context such as induction of general anesthesia. We tested a smartphone app (OptiBP) on 121 patients requiring general anesthesia and invasive BP monitoring. For each patient, ten 1-min segments aligned in time with ten smartphone recordings were extracted from the continuous invasive BP. A total of 1152 recordings from 119 patients were analyzed. After exclusion of 2 subjects and rejection of 565 recordings due to BP estimation not generated by the app, we retained 565 recordings from 109 patients (acceptance rate 51.1%). Concordance rate (CR) and angular CR demonstrated values of more than 90% for systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean (MBP) BP. Error grid analysis showed that 98% of measurement pairs were in no- or low-risk zones for SBP and MBP, of which more than 89% in the no-risk zone. Evaluation of accuracy and precision [bias ± standard deviation (95% limits of agreement)] between the app and the invasive BP was 0.0 ± 7.5 mmHg [− 14.9, 14.8], 0.1 ± 2.9 mmHg [− 5.5, 5.7], and 0.1 ± 4.2 mmHg [− 8.3, 8.4] for SBP, DBP and MBP respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a smartphone app was compared to an invasive BP reference. Its trending ability was investigated in highly dynamic conditions, demonstrating high concordance and accuracy. Our study could lead the way for mobile devices to leverage the measurement of BP and management of hypertension.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–60.CrossRef Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–60.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brouwers S, Sudano I, Kokubo Y, Sulaica EM. Arterial hypertension. Lancet. 2021;398:249–61.CrossRef Brouwers S, Sudano I, Kokubo Y, Sulaica EM. Arterial hypertension. Lancet. 2021;398:249–61.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365:217–23.CrossRef Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365:217–23.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ibrahim MM, Damasceno A. Hypertension in developing countries. Lancet. 2012;380:611–9.CrossRef Ibrahim MM, Damasceno A. Hypertension in developing countries. Lancet. 2012;380:611–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference George J, MacDonald T. Home blood pressure monitoring. Eur Cardiol. 2015;10:95–101.CrossRef George J, MacDonald T. Home blood pressure monitoring. Eur Cardiol. 2015;10:95–101.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pickering TG, Miller NH, Ogedegbe G, Krakoff LR, Artinian NT, Goff D, et al. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Hypertension. 2008;52:10–29.CrossRef Pickering TG, Miller NH, Ogedegbe G, Krakoff LR, Artinian NT, Goff D, et al. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Hypertension. 2008;52:10–29.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, Bilo G, de Leeuw P, Imai Y, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1505–26.CrossRef Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, Bilo G, de Leeuw P, Imai Y, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1505–26.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mukkamala R, Hahn J, Inan OT, Mestha LK, Kim C, Töreyin H, et al. Toward ubiquitous blood pressure monitoring via pulse transit time: theory and practice. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:1879–901.CrossRef Mukkamala R, Hahn J, Inan OT, Mestha LK, Kim C, Töreyin H, et al. Toward ubiquitous blood pressure monitoring via pulse transit time: theory and practice. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:1879–901.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hwang MH, Yoo JK, Kim HK, Hwang CL, Mackay K, Hemstreet O, et al. Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCor Xcel. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28:475–81.CrossRef Hwang MH, Yoo JK, Kim HK, Hwang CL, Mackay K, Hemstreet O, et al. Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCor Xcel. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28:475–81.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rajzer MW, Wojciechowska W, Klocek M, Palka I, Brzozowska-Kiszka M, Kawecka-Jaszcz K. Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior SphygmoCor and Arteriograph. J Hypertens. 2008;26:2001–7.CrossRef Rajzer MW, Wojciechowska W, Klocek M, Palka I, Brzozowska-Kiszka M, Kawecka-Jaszcz K. Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior SphygmoCor and Arteriograph. J Hypertens. 2008;26:2001–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McCombie DB, Reisner AT, Asada HH. Adaptive blood pressure estimation from wearable PPG sensors using peripheral artery pulse wave velocity measurements and multi-channel blind identification of local arterial dynamics. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:3521–4.CrossRef McCombie DB, Reisner AT, Asada HH. Adaptive blood pressure estimation from wearable PPG sensors using peripheral artery pulse wave velocity measurements and multi-channel blind identification of local arterial dynamics. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:3521–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zhang G, Gao M, Xu D, Olivier NB, Mukkamala R. Pulse arrival time is not an adequate surrogate for pulse transit time as a marker of blood pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1985;2011(111):1681–6. Zhang G, Gao M, Xu D, Olivier NB, Mukkamala R. Pulse arrival time is not an adequate surrogate for pulse transit time as a marker of blood pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1985;2011(111):1681–6.
14.
go back to reference Vlachopoulos C, O’Rourke M, Nichols WW. McDonald’s blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. 6th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.CrossRef Vlachopoulos C, O’Rourke M, Nichols WW. McDonald’s blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. 6th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Proença M, Renevey P, Braun F, Bonnier G, Delgado-Gonzalo R, Lemkaddem A, et al. Pulse wave analysis techniques. In: Solà J, Delgado-Gonzalo R, editors., et al., The handbook of cuffless blood pressure monitoring. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 107–37.CrossRef Proença M, Renevey P, Braun F, Bonnier G, Delgado-Gonzalo R, Lemkaddem A, et al. Pulse wave analysis techniques. In: Solà J, Delgado-Gonzalo R, editors., et al., The handbook of cuffless blood pressure monitoring. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 107–37.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, Collier D, et al. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113:1213–25.CrossRef Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, Collier D, et al. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113:1213–25.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007;50:197–203.CrossRef Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007;50:197–203.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Okin PM, Lee ET, Wang W, et al. High central pulse pressure is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome: the strong heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1730–4.CrossRef Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Okin PM, Lee ET, Wang W, et al. High central pulse pressure is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome: the strong heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1730–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dörr M, Weber S, Birkemeyer R, Leonardi L, Winterhalder C, Raichle CJ, et al. iPhone App compared with standard blood pressure measurement—the iPARR trial. Am Heart J. 2021;233:102–8.CrossRef Dörr M, Weber S, Birkemeyer R, Leonardi L, Winterhalder C, Raichle CJ, et al. iPhone App compared with standard blood pressure measurement—the iPARR trial. Am Heart J. 2021;233:102–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Raichle CJ, Eckstein J, Lapaire O, Leonardi L, Brasier N, Vischer AS, et al. Performance of a blood pressure smartphone app in pregnant women: the iPARR trial (iPhone app compared with standard RR measurement). Hypertension. 2018;71:1164–9.CrossRef Raichle CJ, Eckstein J, Lapaire O, Leonardi L, Brasier N, Vischer AS, et al. Performance of a blood pressure smartphone app in pregnant women: the iPARR trial (iPhone app compared with standard RR measurement). Hypertension. 2018;71:1164–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Degott J, Ghajarzadeh-Wurzner A, Hofmann G, Proença M, Bonnier G, Lemkaddem A, et al. Smartphone based blood pressure measurement: accuracy of the OptiBP mobile application according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal validation protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2021;26:441–8.CrossRef Degott J, Ghajarzadeh-Wurzner A, Hofmann G, Proença M, Bonnier G, Lemkaddem A, et al. Smartphone based blood pressure measurement: accuracy of the OptiBP mobile application according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal validation protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2021;26:441–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schoettker P, Degott J, Hofmann G, Proença M, Bonnier G, Lemkaddem A, et al. Blood pressure measurements with the OptiBP smartphone app validated against reference auscultatory measurements. Sci Rep. 2020;10:17827.CrossRef Schoettker P, Degott J, Hofmann G, Proença M, Bonnier G, Lemkaddem A, et al. Blood pressure measurements with the OptiBP smartphone app validated against reference auscultatory measurements. Sci Rep. 2020;10:17827.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Desebbe O, El Hilali M, Kouz K, Alexander B, Karam L, Chirnoaga D, et al. Evaluation of a new smartphone optical blood pressure application (OptiBPTM) in the post-anesthesia care unit: a method comparison study against the non-invasive automatic oscillometric brachial cuff as the reference method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00795-w.CrossRef Desebbe O, El Hilali M, Kouz K, Alexander B, Karam L, Chirnoaga D, et al. Evaluation of a new smartphone optical blood pressure application (OptiBPTM) in the post-anesthesia care unit: a method comparison study against the non-invasive automatic oscillometric brachial cuff as the reference method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10877-021-00795-w.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mukkamala R, Yavarimanesh M, Natarajan K, Hahn J-O, Kyriakoulis KG, Avolio AP, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of cuffless blood pressure measurement devices: challenges and proposals. Hypertension. 2021;78:1161–7.CrossRef Mukkamala R, Yavarimanesh M, Natarajan K, Hahn J-O, Kyriakoulis KG, Avolio AP, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of cuffless blood pressure measurement devices: challenges and proposals. Hypertension. 2021;78:1161–7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Richardson C, Hamann CR, Hamann D, Thyssen JP. Mobile phone dermatitis in children and adults: a review of the literature. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2014;27:60–9.CrossRef Richardson C, Hamann CR, Hamann D, Thyssen JP. Mobile phone dermatitis in children and adults: a review of the literature. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2014;27:60–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference European Parliament. Council directive 93/42/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union 1993. European Parliament. Council directive 93/42/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union 1993.
28.
go back to reference The Swiss Federal Council. Ordinance on clinical trials in human research. Human Research Act (HRA). 2018. The Swiss Federal Council. Ordinance on clinical trials in human research. Human Research Act (HRA). 2018.
29.
go back to reference ISO. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects—good clinical practice. Bs En Iso 14155-2:2009. 2011. ISO. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects—good clinical practice. Bs En Iso 14155-2:2009. 2011.
30.
go back to reference International Organization for Standardization. ISO 81060-2:2018 non-invasive sphygmomanometers—part 2: clinical investigation of intermittent automated measurement type. 2018. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 81060-2:2018 non-invasive sphygmomanometers—part 2: clinical investigation of intermittent automated measurement type. 2018.
32.
go back to reference Ghamri Y, Proença M, Hofmann G, Renevey P, Bonnier G, Braun F, et al. Automated pulse oximeter waveform analysis to track changes in blood pressure during anesthesia induction: a proof-of-concept study. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:1222–33.CrossRef Ghamri Y, Proença M, Hofmann G, Renevey P, Bonnier G, Braun F, et al. Automated pulse oximeter waveform analysis to track changes in blood pressure during anesthesia induction: a proof-of-concept study. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:1222–33.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM-H. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180–92. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM-H. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180–92.
34.
go back to reference Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:536–46.CrossRef Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:536–46.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Saugel B, Grothe O, Nicklas JY. Error grid analysis for arterial pressure method comparison studies. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1177–85.CrossRef Saugel B, Grothe O, Nicklas JY. Error grid analysis for arterial pressure method comparison studies. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1177–85.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Riffenburgh RH. Statistics in medicine. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2006. Riffenburgh RH. Statistics in medicine. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2006.
37.
go back to reference Kim S-H, Lilot M, Sidhu KS, Rinehart J, Yu Z, Canales C, et al. Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1080–97.CrossRef Kim S-H, Lilot M, Sidhu KS, Rinehart J, Yu Z, Canales C, et al. Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1080–97.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hapfelmeier A, Cecconi M, Saugel B. Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:149–55.CrossRef Hapfelmeier A, Cecconi M, Saugel B. Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:149–55.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Juri T, Suehiro K, Uchimoto A, Go H, Fujimoto Y, Mori T, et al. Error grid analysis for risk management in the difference between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements. J Anesth. 2021;35:189–96.CrossRef Juri T, Suehiro K, Uchimoto A, Go H, Fujimoto Y, Mori T, et al. Error grid analysis for risk management in the difference between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements. J Anesth. 2021;35:189–96.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Fortin J, Lerche K, Flot-zinger D, O’Brien T. Is the standard supplied by the association for the advancement of medical instrumentation the measure of all things for noninvasive continuous hemodynamic devices? Anesthesiology. 2015;122:208–9.CrossRef Fortin J, Lerche K, Flot-zinger D, O’Brien T. Is the standard supplied by the association for the advancement of medical instrumentation the measure of all things for noninvasive continuous hemodynamic devices? Anesthesiology. 2015;122:208–9.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220–35.CrossRef Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220–35.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Juri T, Suehiro K, Kimura A, Mukai A, Tanaka K, Yamada T, et al. Impact of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on hemodynamic fluctuation during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32:1005–13.CrossRef Juri T, Suehiro K, Kimura A, Mukai A, Tanaka K, Yamada T, et al. Impact of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on hemodynamic fluctuation during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32:1005–13.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Gratz I, Deal E, Spitz F, Baruch M, Allen IE, Seaman JE, et al. Continuous non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:48.CrossRef Gratz I, Deal E, Spitz F, Baruch M, Allen IE, Seaman JE, et al. Continuous non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:48.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Stenglova A, Benes J. Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure assessment during surgery to improve outcome. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:202.CrossRef Stenglova A, Benes J. Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure assessment during surgery to improve outcome. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:202.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Smolle K-H, Schmid M, Prettenthaler H, Weger C. The accuracy of the CNAP® device compared with invasive radial artery measurements for providing continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure readings at a medical intensive care unit: a method-comparison study. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1508–16.CrossRef Smolle K-H, Schmid M, Prettenthaler H, Weger C. The accuracy of the CNAP® device compared with invasive radial artery measurements for providing continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure readings at a medical intensive care unit: a method-comparison study. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1508–16.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies—with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care. 2009;13:201.CrossRef Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies—with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care. 2009;13:201.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
Authors
G. Hofmann
M. Proença
J. Degott
G. Bonnier
A. Lemkaddem
M. Lemay
R. Schorer
U. Christen
J.-F. Knebel
P. Schoettker
Publication date
21-06-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00886-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2023 Go to the issue