Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Intracranial Aneurysm | Original Research

Cautionary findings for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery after a single administration of rocuronium to facilitate tracheal intubation

Authors: Hironobu Hayashi, John F. Bebawy, Antoun Koht, Laura B. Hemmer

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Administration of rocuronium to facilitate intubation has traditionally been regarded as acceptable for intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring because of sufficiently rapid spontaneous neuromuscular blockade recovery. We hypothesized that residual neuromuscular blockade, in an amount that could hinder optimal neuromonitoring in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm clipping, was still present at dural opening. We sought to identify how often this was occurring and to identify factors which may contribute to prolonged blockade. Records of 97 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Rocuronium was administered to facilitate intubation with no additional neuromuscular blockade given. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.75 after rocuronium administration was defined as 120 min, which was approximately when dural opening and the setting of baseline MEPs were occurring. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to prolonged spontaneous recovery time. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a TOF ratio of 0.75 was observed in 44.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis showed that only the dosage of rocuronium based on ideal body weight had a positive correlation with prolonged spontaneous recovery time (P = 0.01). There was no significant association between dosage of rocuronium based on total body weight, age, sex, or body temperature and prolonged recovery time. This study demonstrates that the duration of relaxation for MEP monitoring purposes is well-beyond the routinely recognized clinical duration of rocuronium. Residual neuromuscular blockade could result in lower amplitude MEP signals and/or lead to higher required MEP stimulus intensities which can both compromise monitoring sensitivity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neuloh G, Schramm J. Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:389–99.CrossRef Neuloh G, Schramm J. Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:389–99.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Quinones-Hinojosa A, Alam M, Lyon R, Yingling CD, Lawton MT. Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:916–24.CrossRef Quinones-Hinojosa A, Alam M, Lyon R, Yingling CD, Lawton MT. Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:916–24.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Horiuchi K, Suzuki K, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Sakuma J, Konno Y, Oinuma M, Itakura T, Kodama N. Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow insufficiency during surgery of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:275–83.CrossRef Horiuchi K, Suzuki K, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Sakuma J, Konno Y, Oinuma M, Itakura T, Kodama N. Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow insufficiency during surgery of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:275–83.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Weinzierl MR, Reinacher P, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30:109–16.CrossRef Weinzierl MR, Reinacher P, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30:109–16.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Suzuki K, Kodama N, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Konno Y, Sakuma J, Oinuma M, Murakawa M. Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow insufficiency in the anterior choroidal artery during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:507–14.CrossRef Suzuki K, Kodama N, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Konno Y, Sakuma J, Oinuma M, Murakawa M. Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow insufficiency in the anterior choroidal artery during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:507–14.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Szelenyi A, Langer D, Kothbauer K, Bueno De Camargo A, Flamm ES, Deletis V. Monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm surgery: intraoperative changes and postoperative outcome. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:675–81.CrossRef Szelenyi A, Langer D, Kothbauer K, Bueno De Camargo A, Flamm ES, Deletis V. Monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm surgery: intraoperative changes and postoperative outcome. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:675–81.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Szelenyi A, Langer D, Beck J, Raabe A, Flamm ES, Seifert V, Deletis V. Transcranial and direct cortical stimulation for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracerebral aneurysm surgery. Neurophysiol Clin. 2007;37:391–8.CrossRef Szelenyi A, Langer D, Beck J, Raabe A, Flamm ES, Seifert V, Deletis V. Transcranial and direct cortical stimulation for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracerebral aneurysm surgery. Neurophysiol Clin. 2007;37:391–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sasaki T, Kodama N, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto M, Ichikawa T, Munakata R, Muramatsu H, Kasuya H. Blood flow disturbance in perforating arteries attributable to aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:60–7.CrossRef Sasaki T, Kodama N, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto M, Ichikawa T, Munakata R, Muramatsu H, Kasuya H. Blood flow disturbance in perforating arteries attributable to aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:60–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Irie T, Yoshitani K, Ohnishi Y, Shinzawa M, Miura N, Kusaka Y, Miyazaki S, Miyamoto S. The efficacy of motor-evoked potentials on cerebral aneurysm surgery and new-onset postoperative motor deficits. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010;22:247–51.CrossRef Irie T, Yoshitani K, Ohnishi Y, Shinzawa M, Miura N, Kusaka Y, Miyazaki S, Miyamoto S. The efficacy of motor-evoked potentials on cerebral aneurysm surgery and new-onset postoperative motor deficits. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010;22:247–51.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yeon JY, Seo DW, Hong SC, Kim JS. Transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring during the surgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Sci. 2010;293:29–34.CrossRef Yeon JY, Seo DW, Hong SC, Kim JS. Transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring during the surgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Sci. 2010;293:29–34.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yue Q, Zhu W, Gu Y, Xu B, Lang L, Song J, Cai J, Xu G, Chen L, Mao Y. Motor evoked potential monitoring during surgery of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a cohort study. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:1091–9.CrossRef Yue Q, Zhu W, Gu Y, Xu B, Lang L, Song J, Cai J, Xu G, Chen L, Mao Y. Motor evoked potential monitoring during surgery of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a cohort study. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:1091–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weigang E, Hartert M, von Samson P, Sircar R, Pitzer K, Genstorfer J, Zentner J, Beyersdorf F. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: interplay of spinal cord protecting modalities. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:624–31.CrossRef Weigang E, Hartert M, von Samson P, Sircar R, Pitzer K, Genstorfer J, Zentner J, Beyersdorf F. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: interplay of spinal cord protecting modalities. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:624–31.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guo L, Gelb AW. False negatives, muscle relaxants, and motor-evoked potentials. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011;23:64.CrossRef Guo L, Gelb AW. False negatives, muscle relaxants, and motor-evoked potentials. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011;23:64.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Guo L, Gelb AW. The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:648–55.CrossRef Guo L, Gelb AW. The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:648–55.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sloan TB. Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27:35–46.CrossRef Sloan TB. Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27:35–46.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference van Dongen EP, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ, ter Beek HT, Aarts LP, de Boer A, Boezeman EH. Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: use of evoked potential monitoring in 118 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:1035–40.CrossRef van Dongen EP, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ, ter Beek HT, Aarts LP, de Boer A, Boezeman EH. Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: use of evoked potential monitoring in 118 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:1035–40.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Macdonald DB, Janusz M. An approach to intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:43–544.CrossRef Macdonald DB, Janusz M. An approach to intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:43–544.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Macdonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:347–77.CrossRef Macdonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:347–77.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moreault O, Lacasse Y, Bussières JS. Calculating ideal body weight: keep it simple. Anesthesiology. 2017;127:203–4.CrossRef Moreault O, Lacasse Y, Bussières JS. Calculating ideal body weight: keep it simple. Anesthesiology. 2017;127:203–4.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1042–8.CrossRef Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1042–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear TD, Deshur MA, Benson J, Newmark RL, Maher CE. Anesthesiology, 2018(1);128:27–37. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear TD, Deshur MA, Benson J, Newmark RL, Maher CE. Anesthesiology, 2018(1);128:27–37.
22.
go back to reference Murphy GS, Kopman AF. “To reverse or not to reverse?” The answer is clear! Anesthesiology. 2016;125(4):611–4.CrossRef Murphy GS, Kopman AF. “To reverse or not to reverse?” The answer is clear! Anesthesiology. 2016;125(4):611–4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Dormans JP, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Flynn JM, Li M, Shah SA, Welch W, Drummond DS, Albert TJ. Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery. Spine. 2011;36(13):1046–9.CrossRef Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Dormans JP, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Flynn JM, Li M, Shah SA, Welch W, Drummond DS, Albert TJ. Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery. Spine. 2011;36(13):1046–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:129–40.CrossRef Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:129–40.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:120–8.CrossRef Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:120–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Franklin M, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual paralysis at the time of tracheal extubation. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1840–5.CrossRef Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Franklin M, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual paralysis at the time of tracheal extubation. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1840–5.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Schlaich N, Mertzlufft F, Soltész S, Fuchs-Buder T. Remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants or with different doses of rocuronium for tracheal intubation in outpatient anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:720–6.CrossRef Schlaich N, Mertzlufft F, Soltész S, Fuchs-Buder T. Remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants or with different doses of rocuronium for tracheal intubation in outpatient anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:720–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Barclay K, Eggers K, Asai T. Low-dose rocuronium improves conditions for tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:92–4.CrossRef Barclay K, Eggers K, Asai T. Low-dose rocuronium improves conditions for tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:92–4.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Siddik-Sayyid SM, Taha SK, Kanazi GE, Chehade JM, Zbeidy RA, Al Alami AA, Zahreddine BW, Khatib MF, Baraka AS, Aouad MT. Excellent intubating conditions with remifentanil-propofol and either low-dose rocuronium or succinylcholine. Can J Anesth. 2009;56:483–8.CrossRef Siddik-Sayyid SM, Taha SK, Kanazi GE, Chehade JM, Zbeidy RA, Al Alami AA, Zahreddine BW, Khatib MF, Baraka AS, Aouad MT. Excellent intubating conditions with remifentanil-propofol and either low-dose rocuronium or succinylcholine. Can J Anesth. 2009;56:483–8.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Taha S, Siddik-Sayyid S, Alameddine M, Wakim C, Dahabra C, Moussa A, Khatib M, Baraka A. Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubation without muscle relaxants. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:249–53.CrossRef Taha S, Siddik-Sayyid S, Alameddine M, Wakim C, Dahabra C, Moussa A, Khatib M, Baraka A. Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubation without muscle relaxants. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:249–53.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Stevens JB, Wheatley L. Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients: using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:45–9.PubMed Stevens JB, Wheatley L. Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients: using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:45–9.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Klemola UM, Mennander S, Saarnivaara L. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:465–9.CrossRef Klemola UM, Mennander S, Saarnivaara L. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:465–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Pavoni V, Gianesello L, De Scisciolo G, Provvedi E, Horton D, Barbagli R, Conti P, Conti R, Giunta F. Reversal of profound and “deep” residual rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex: a neurophysiological study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:542–9.PubMed Pavoni V, Gianesello L, De Scisciolo G, Provvedi E, Horton D, Barbagli R, Conti P, Conti R, Giunta F. Reversal of profound and “deep” residual rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex: a neurophysiological study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:542–9.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Brull SJ. Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC, Ortega R, Sharar SR, Holt, NF (eds) Clinical Anesthesia, 8th Ed. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia 2017, pp 534–7. Brull SJ. Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC, Ortega R, Sharar SR, Holt, NF (eds) Clinical Anesthesia, 8th Ed. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia 2017, pp 534–7.
35.
go back to reference Magorian T, Flannery KB, Miller RD. Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:913–8.CrossRef Magorian T, Flannery KB, Miller RD. Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:913–8.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Wright PMC, Caldwell JE, Miller RD. Onset and duration of rocuronium and succinylcholine at the adductor pollicis and laryngeal adductor muscles in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1110–5.CrossRef Wright PMC, Caldwell JE, Miller RD. Onset and duration of rocuronium and succinylcholine at the adductor pollicis and laryngeal adductor muscles in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1110–5.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Cheymol G. Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics implications for drug therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39:215–31.CrossRef Cheymol G. Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics implications for drug therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39:215–31.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Leykin Y, Pellis T, Lucca M, Lomangino G, Marzano B, Gullo A. The pharmacodynamic effects of rocuronium when dosed according to real body weight or ideal body weight in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1086–9.CrossRef Leykin Y, Pellis T, Lucca M, Lomangino G, Marzano B, Gullo A. The pharmacodynamic effects of rocuronium when dosed according to real body weight or ideal body weight in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1086–9.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Meyhoff CS, Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Claudius C, Sorensen AM, Viby-Mogensen J, Rasmussen LS. Should dosing of rocuronium in obese patients be based on ideal or corrected body weight? Anesth Analg. 2009;109:787–92.CrossRef Meyhoff CS, Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Claudius C, Sorensen AM, Viby-Mogensen J, Rasmussen LS. Should dosing of rocuronium in obese patients be based on ideal or corrected body weight? Anesth Analg. 2009;109:787–92.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hemmer LB, Zeeni C, Bebawy JF, Bendok BR, Cotton MA, Shah NB, Gupta DK, Koht A. The incidence of unacceptable movement with motor evoked potentials during craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. World Neurosurg. 2014;81:99–104.CrossRef Hemmer LB, Zeeni C, Bebawy JF, Bendok BR, Cotton MA, Shah NB, Gupta DK, Koht A. The incidence of unacceptable movement with motor evoked potentials during craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. World Neurosurg. 2014;81:99–104.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Dahaba AA, Perelman SI, Moskowitz DM, Bennett HL, Shander A, Xiao Z, Huang L, An G, Bornemann H, Wilfinger HB, Rehak PH, List WF, Metzler H. Geographic regional differences in rocuronium bromide dose-response relation and time course of action: an overlooked factor in determining recommended dosage. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:950–3.CrossRef Dahaba AA, Perelman SI, Moskowitz DM, Bennett HL, Shander A, Xiao Z, Huang L, An G, Bornemann H, Wilfinger HB, Rehak PH, List WF, Metzler H. Geographic regional differences in rocuronium bromide dose-response relation and time course of action: an overlooked factor in determining recommended dosage. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:950–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cautionary findings for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery after a single administration of rocuronium to facilitate tracheal intubation
Authors
Hironobu Hayashi
John F. Bebawy
Antoun Koht
Laura B. Hemmer
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00551-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2021 Go to the issue