Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurosurgical Review 2/2007

01-04-2007 | Original Article

Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations

Authors: M. R. Weinzierl, P. Reinacher, J. M. Gilsbach, V. Rohde

Published in: Neurosurgical Review | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The primary objective of neurophysiologic monitoring during surgery is to avoid permanent neurological injury resulting from surgical manipulation. To prevent motor deficits, either somatosensory (SSEP) or transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) are applied. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate if the combined use of SSEP and MEP might be beneficial. Combined SSEP/MEP monitoring was attempted in 100 consecutive procedures, including intracranial and spinal operations. Repetitive transcranial electric motor cortex stimulation was used to elicit MEP from muscles of the upper and lower limb. Stimulation of the tibial and median nerves was performed to record SSEP. Critical SSEP/MEP changes were defined as decreases in amplitude of more than 50% or increases in latency of more than 10% of baseline values. The operation was paused or the surgical strategy was modified in every case of SSEP/MEP changes. Combined SSEP/MEP monitoring was possible in 69 out of 100 operations. In 49 of the 69 operations (71%), SSEP/ MEP were stable, and the patients remained neurologically intact. Critical SSEP/ MEP changes were seen in six operations. Critical MEP changes with stable SSEP occurred in 12 operations. Overall, critical MEP changes were recorded in 18 operations (26%). In 12 of the 18 operations, MEP recovered to some extent after modification of the surgical strategy, and the patients either showed no (n = 10) or only a transient motor deficit (n = 2). In the remaining six operations, MEP did not recover and the patients either had a transient (n = 3) or a permanent (n = 3) motor deficit. Critical SSEP changes with stable MEP were observed in two operations; both patients did not show a new motor deficit. Our data again confirm that MEP monitoring is superior to SSEP monitoring in detecting impending impairment of the functional integrity of cerebral and spinal cord motor pathways during surgery. Detection of MEP changes and adjustment of the surgical strategy might allow to prevent irreversible pyramidal tract damage. Stable SSEP/MEP recordings reassure the surgeon that motor function is still intact and surgery can be continued safely. The combined SSEP/ MEP monitoring becomes advantageous, if one modality is not recordable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Browning JL, Heizer ML, Baskin DS (1992) Variations in corticomotor and somatosensory evoked potentials: effects of temperature, halothane anesthesia, and arterial partial pressure of CO2. Anesth Analg 74:643–648PubMedCrossRef Browning JL, Heizer ML, Baskin DS (1992) Variations in corticomotor and somatosensory evoked potentials: effects of temperature, halothane anesthesia, and arterial partial pressure of CO2. Anesth Analg 74:643–648PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schafer S, Schramm J (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38:962–970PubMedCrossRef Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schafer S, Schramm J (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38:962–970PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deletis V (1993) Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. Adv Neurol 63:201–214PubMed Deletis V (1993) Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. Adv Neurol 63:201–214PubMed
4.
go back to reference Deletis V, Camargo AB (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 49:1488–1489PubMedCrossRef Deletis V, Camargo AB (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 49:1488–1489PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Deletis V, Sala F (2001) The role of intraoperative neurophysiology in the protection or documentation of surgically induced injury to the spinal cord. Ann NY Acad Sci 939:137–144PubMedCrossRef Deletis V, Sala F (2001) The role of intraoperative neurophysiology in the protection or documentation of surgically induced injury to the spinal cord. Ann NY Acad Sci 939:137–144PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Friedman WA, Chadwick GM, Verhoeven FJ, Mahla M, Day AL (1991) Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 29:83–88PubMedCrossRef Friedman WA, Chadwick GM, Verhoeven FJ, Mahla M, Day AL (1991) Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 29:83–88PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ginsburg HH, Shetter AG, Raudzens PA (1985) Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Case report. J Neurosurg 63:296–300PubMed Ginsburg HH, Shetter AG, Raudzens PA (1985) Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Case report. J Neurosurg 63:296–300PubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Holland NR (1998) Subcortical strokes from intracranial aneurysm surgery: implications for intraoperative neuromonitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:439–446PubMedCrossRef Holland NR (1998) Subcortical strokes from intracranial aneurysm surgery: implications for intraoperative neuromonitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:439–446PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M (2001) Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95:608–614PubMed Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M (2001) Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95:608–614PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Krieger D, Adams HP, Albert F, von Haken M, Hacke W (1992) Pure motor hemiparesis with stable somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm surgery: case report. Neurosurgery 31:145–150PubMedCrossRef Krieger D, Adams HP, Albert F, von Haken M, Hacke W (1992) Pure motor hemiparesis with stable somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm surgery: case report. Neurosurgery 31:145–150PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lang EW, Beutler AS, Chesnut RM, Patel PM, Kennelly NA, Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Garfin SR (1996) Myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring using partial neuromuscular blockade in surgery of the spine. Spine 21:1676–1686PubMedCrossRef Lang EW, Beutler AS, Chesnut RM, Patel PM, Kennelly NA, Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Garfin SR (1996) Myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring using partial neuromuscular blockade in surgery of the spine. Spine 21:1676–1686PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mizoi K, Yoshimoto T (1993) Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery 33:434–440PubMed Mizoi K, Yoshimoto T (1993) Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery 33:434–440PubMed
15.
go back to reference Morota N, Deletis V, Constantini S, Kofler M, Cohen H, Epstein FJ (1997) The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 41:1327–1336PubMedCrossRef Morota N, Deletis V, Constantini S, Kofler M, Cohen H, Epstein FJ (1997) The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 41:1327–1336PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54:1061–1070PubMedCrossRef Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54:1061–1070PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 100:389–399PubMedCrossRef Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 100:389–399PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring for the surgery of brain tumours and vascular malformations. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 29:171–228PubMed Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring for the surgery of brain tumours and vascular malformations. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 29:171–228PubMed
19.
go back to reference Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J (1996) Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:335–343PubMedCrossRef Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J (1996) Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:335–343PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pelosi L, Jardine A, Webb JK (1999) Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:662–664PubMedCrossRef Pelosi L, Jardine A, Webb JK (1999) Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:662–664PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian SM, Webb JK, Blumhardt LD (2002) Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1082–1091PubMedCrossRef Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian SM, Webb JK, Blumhardt LD (2002) Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1082–1091PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Quinones-Hinojosa A, Alam M, Lyon R, Yingling CD, Lawton MT (2004) Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 54:916–924PubMedCrossRef Quinones-Hinojosa A, Alam M, Lyon R, Yingling CD, Lawton MT (2004) Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 54:916–924PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rohde V, Krombach GA, Baumert JH, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Weinzierl M, Gilsbach JM (2003) Measurement of motor evoked potentials following repetitive magnetic motor cortex stimulation during isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 91:487–492PubMedCrossRef Rohde V, Krombach GA, Baumert JH, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Weinzierl M, Gilsbach JM (2003) Measurement of motor evoked potentials following repetitive magnetic motor cortex stimulation during isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 91:487–492PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rohde V, Will BE, Hahn G, Bien S, Zentner J (1999) Motor evoked potentials during embolization of arteriovenous malformations for the detection of ischemic complications. Zentralbl Neurochir 60:74–80PubMed Rohde V, Will BE, Hahn G, Bien S, Zentner J (1999) Motor evoked potentials during embolization of arteriovenous malformations for the detection of ischemic complications. Zentralbl Neurochir 60:74–80PubMed
25.
go back to reference Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J (1993) Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 32:219–226PubMedCrossRef Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J (1993) Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 32:219–226PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Woodforth IJ, Hicks RG, Crawford MR, Stephen JP, Burke DJ (1996) Variability of motor evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation. Anesth Analg 82:744–749PubMedCrossRef Woodforth IJ, Hicks RG, Crawford MR, Stephen JP, Burke DJ (1996) Variability of motor evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation. Anesth Analg 82:744–749PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zhou HH, Kelly PJ (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 48:1075–1080PubMedCrossRef Zhou HH, Kelly PJ (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 48:1075–1080PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations
Authors
M. R. Weinzierl
P. Reinacher
J. M. Gilsbach
V. Rohde
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Neurosurgical Review / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0344-5607
Electronic ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-006-0061-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Neurosurgical Review 2/2007 Go to the issue