Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2020

01-04-2020 | Opioids | Original Reseach

Pharmacodynamic modelling of the effect of remifentanil using the Pupillary Pain Index

Authors: Sérgio Vide, Ana Castro, Pedro Antunes, Deolinda Lima, Merlin Larson, Pedro Gambús, Pedro Amorim

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Using a targeted controlled infusion of remifentanil during total intravenous anesthesia, we investigated the effect-site concentrations of remifentanil that correlate with different values of the Pupillary Pain Index and which concentrations were necessary for achieving a Pupillary Pain Index ≤ 4 and its usefulness in titrating opioids. The Pupillary Pain Index was measured in 54 patients prior to surgery under different remifentanil effect-site concentrations and subsequently modeled. One hundred and twenty-eight measurements were taken at different remifentanil concentrations while titrating propofol for a similar depth of hypnosis using a BIS monitor. Our modeled Hill equation revealed a remifentanil of 2.96 ng/mL for a PPI of 4, and the probability model a Ce of 3.22 ng/mL for the probability of 50% of patients achieving a PPI score ≤ 4. For the probability of 80% of patients achieving a PPI score ≤ 4 the Ce of remifentanil was 4.39 ng/mL. We conclude that concentrations of remifentanil that have been shown to suppress movement in response to noxious stimulation correspond to a Pupillary Pain Index ≤ 4.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Liu Z, Wang F, Wang W, Luo Y. Median effective concentration of remifentanil for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced cardiovascular responses. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(1):457–62.CrossRef Liu Z, Wang F, Wang W, Luo Y. Median effective concentration of remifentanil for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced cardiovascular responses. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(1):457–62.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim MK, Lee JW, Jang DJ, Shin OY, Nam SB. Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(2):136–40.CrossRef Kim MK, Lee JW, Jang DJ, Shin OY, Nam SB. Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(2):136–40.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Guglielminotti J, Grillot N, Paule M, et al. Prediction of movement to surgical stimulation by the pupillary dilatation reflex amplitude evoked by a standardized noxious test. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(5):985–93.CrossRef Guglielminotti J, Grillot N, Paule M, et al. Prediction of movement to surgical stimulation by the pupillary dilatation reflex amplitude evoked by a standardized noxious test. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(5):985–93.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):10–23.CrossRef Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):10–23.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):24–33.CrossRef Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):24–33.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Larson MD, Behrends M. Portable infrared pupillometry. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(6):1242–53.CrossRef Larson MD, Behrends M. Portable infrared pupillometry. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(6):1242–53.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wildemeersch D, Peeters N, Saldien V, Vercauteren M, Hans G. Pain assessment by pupil dilation reflex in response to noxious stimulation in anaesthetized adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(8):1050–56.CrossRef Wildemeersch D, Peeters N, Saldien V, Vercauteren M, Hans G. Pain assessment by pupil dilation reflex in response to noxious stimulation in anaesthetized adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(8):1050–56.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vide S, Costa CM, Gambus PL, Amorim PP. Effects of ketamine on pupillary reflex dilation: a case report. A&A Pract. 2018;10(2):39–41. Vide S, Costa CM, Gambus PL, Amorim PP. Effects of ketamine on pupillary reflex dilation: a case report. A&A Pract. 2018;10(2):39–41.
9.
go back to reference Hannivoort LN, Vereecke HEM, Proost JH, et al. Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):624–31.CrossRef Hannivoort LN, Vereecke HEM, Proost JH, et al. Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):624–31.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goutelle S, Maurin M, Rougier F, et al. The Hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2008;22(6):633–48.CrossRef Goutelle S, Maurin M, Rougier F, et al. The Hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2008;22(6):633–48.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smith HS. Variations in opioid responsiveness. Pain Physician. 2008;11:237–48.PubMed Smith HS. Variations in opioid responsiveness. Pain Physician. 2008;11:237–48.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Searle R, Hopkins PM. Pharmacogenomic variability and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(1):14–25.CrossRef Searle R, Hopkins PM. Pharmacogenomic variability and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(1):14–25.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cowen R, Stasiowska MK, Laycock H, Bantel C. Assessing pain objectively: the use of physiological markers. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(7):828–47.CrossRef Cowen R, Stasiowska MK, Laycock H, Bantel C. Assessing pain objectively: the use of physiological markers. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(7):828–47.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sabourdin N, Barrois J, Louvet N, et al. Pupillometry-guided intraoperative remifentanil administration versus standard practice influences opioid use: a randomized study. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(2):284–92.CrossRef Sabourdin N, Barrois J, Louvet N, et al. Pupillometry-guided intraoperative remifentanil administration versus standard practice influences opioid use: a randomized study. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(2):284–92.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Iohom G, Ni Chonghaile M, O’Brien JK, Cunningham AJ, Fitzgerald DF, Shields DC. An investigation of potential genetic determinants of propofol requirements and recovery from anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24(11):912–9.CrossRef Iohom G, Ni Chonghaile M, O’Brien JK, Cunningham AJ, Fitzgerald DF, Shields DC. An investigation of potential genetic determinants of propofol requirements and recovery from anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24(11):912–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sabourdin N, Peretout JB, Khalil E, Guye ML, Louvet N, Constant I. Influence of depth of hypnosis on pupillary reactivity to a standardized tetanic stimulus in patients under propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion: a crossover randomized pilot study. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):70–7.CrossRef Sabourdin N, Peretout JB, Khalil E, Guye ML, Louvet N, Constant I. Influence of depth of hypnosis on pupillary reactivity to a standardized tetanic stimulus in patients under propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion: a crossover randomized pilot study. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):70–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sabourdin N, Diarra C, Wolk R, Piat V, Louvet N, Constant I. Pupillary Pain Index changes after a standardized bolus of Alfentanil under Sevoflurane Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2018;128(3):467–74.CrossRef Sabourdin N, Diarra C, Wolk R, Piat V, Louvet N, Constant I. Pupillary Pain Index changes after a standardized bolus of Alfentanil under Sevoflurane Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2018;128(3):467–74.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Larson MD, Gambus PL, Agusti M, Pacheco A, Capsi P, Valencia JF. Pupil Size, Opioids, and Nociception: Does the Pupil Mirror Off Cell Activity During Anesthesia. In: Journal Symposium, ASA Annual Meeting October. 2017. Larson MD, Gambus PL, Agusti M, Pacheco A, Capsi P, Valencia JF. Pupil Size, Opioids, and Nociception: Does the Pupil Mirror Off Cell Activity During Anesthesia. In: Journal Symposium, ASA Annual Meeting October. 2017.
Metadata
Title
Pharmacodynamic modelling of the effect of remifentanil using the Pupillary Pain Index
Authors
Sérgio Vide
Ana Castro
Pedro Antunes
Deolinda Lima
Merlin Larson
Pedro Gambús
Pedro Amorim
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00323-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2020 Go to the issue