Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2019

01-12-2019 | Affective Disorder | Original Research

Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia

Authors: Carl Tams, Noah Syroid, Terrie Vasilopoulos, Ken Johnson

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Titrating an intraoperative anesthetic to achieve the postoperative goals of rapid emergence and prolonged analgesia can be difficult because of inter-patient variability and the need to provide intraoperative sedation and analgesia. Modeling pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anesthetic administrations estimates drug concentrations and predicted responses to stimuli during anesthesia. With utility of these PK/PD models we created an algorithm to optimize the intraoperative dosing regimen. We hypothesized the optimization algorithm would find a dosing regimen that would increase the postoperative duration of analgesia, not increase the time to emergence, and meet the intraoperative requirements of sedation and analgesia. To evaluate these hypotheses we performed a simulation study on previously collected anesthesia data. We developed an algorithm to recommend different intraoperative dosing regimens for improved post-operative results. To test the post-operative results of the algorithm we tested it on previously collected anesthesia data. An anesthetic dataset of 21 patients was obtained from a previous study from an anesthetic database at the University of Utah. Using the anesthetic records from these surgeries we modeled 21 patients using the same patient demographics and anesthetic requirements as the dataset. The anesthetic was simulated for each of the 21 patients with three different dosing regimens. The three dosing regimens are: from the anesthesiologist as recorded in the dataset (control group), from the algorithm in the clinical scenario one (test group), and from the algorithm in the clinical scenario two (test group). We created two clinical scenarios for the optimization algorithm to perform; one with normal general anesthesia constraints and goals, and a second condition where a delayed time to emergence is allowed to further maximize the duration of analgesia. The algorithm was evaluated by comparing the post-operative results of the control group to each of the test groups. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 1 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 6 min and the time to emergence by 0.3 min. This was achieved by decreasing the intraoperative remifentanil infusion rate, increased the fentanyl dosing regimen, and not changing the propofol infusion rate. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 2 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 26 min and emergence by 1.5 min. To dosing regimen from clinical scenario 2 greatly increased the fentanyl dosing regimen and greatly decreased the remifentanil infusion rate with no change to the propofol infusion rate. The results from this preliminary analysis of the optimization algorithm appear to imply that it can operate as intended. However a clinical study is warranted to determine to what extent the optimization algorithm determined optimal dosing regimens can maximize the postoperative duration of analgesia without delaying the time to emergence in a clinical setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Egan T. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A preliminary appraisal. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995;29(2):80–94.CrossRef Egan T. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A preliminary appraisal. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995;29(2):80–94.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Egan T. The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87074B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:881–92.CrossRef Egan T. The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87074B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:881–92.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schnider T, Minto C, Gambus P, Andresen C, Goodale D, Shafer S, Youngs E. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(5):1170–82.CrossRef Schnider T, Minto C, Gambus P, Andresen C, Goodale D, Shafer S, Youngs E. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(5):1170–82.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schnider T, Minto C, Shafer S, Gambus P, Andresen C, Goodale D, Youngs E. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(6):1502–16.CrossRef Schnider T, Minto C, Shafer S, Gambus P, Andresen C, Goodale D, Youngs E. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(6):1502–16.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shafer S, Varvel J, Aziz N, Scott J. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump. Anesthesiology. 1990;73(6):1091–102.CrossRef Shafer S, Varvel J, Aziz N, Scott J. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump. Anesthesiology. 1990;73(6):1091–102.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Minto C, Schnider T, Egan T, Youngs E, Lemmens H, Gambus P, Billard V, Hoke J, Moore K, Hermann D, Muir K, Mandema J, Shafer S. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):10–23.CrossRef Minto C, Schnider T, Egan T, Youngs E, Lemmens H, Gambus P, Billard V, Hoke J, Moore K, Hermann D, Muir K, Mandema J, Shafer S. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):10–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Minto C, Schnider T, Shafer S. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):24–33.CrossRef Minto C, Schnider T, Shafer S. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):24–33.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bouillon T. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, Bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1353–72.CrossRef Bouillon T. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, Bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1353–72.CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Johnson K, Syroid N, Gupta D, Manyam S, Egan T, Huntington J, White J, Tyler D, Westenskow D. An evaluation of remifentanil propofol response surfaces for loss of responsiveness, loss of response to surrogates of painful stimuli and laryngoscopy in patients undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:471–9.CrossRef Johnson K, Syroid N, Gupta D, Manyam S, Egan T, Huntington J, White J, Tyler D, Westenskow D. An evaluation of remifentanil propofol response surfaces for loss of responsiveness, loss of response to surrogates of painful stimuli and laryngoscopy in patients undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:471–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lapierre C, Johnson K, Randall B, White J, Egan T. An exploration of remifentanil-propofol combinations that lead to a loss of response to esophageal instrumentation, a loss of responsiveness, and/or onset of intolerable ventilatory depression. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(3):490–9.PubMed Lapierre C, Johnson K, Randall B, White J, Egan T. An exploration of remifentanil-propofol combinations that lead to a loss of response to esophageal instrumentation, a loss of responsiveness, and/or onset of intolerable ventilatory depression. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(3):490–9.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Vuyk J. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(6):1549–62.CrossRef Vuyk J. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(6):1549–62.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Syroid N, Agutter J, Drews F, Westenskow D, Albert R, Bermudez J, Strayer D, Prenzel H, Loeb R, Weinger M. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:565–74.CrossRef Syroid N, Agutter J, Drews F, Westenskow D, Albert R, Bermudez J, Strayer D, Prenzel H, Loeb R, Weinger M. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:565–74.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cirillo V, Marinosci G, Robertis E, Iacono C, Romano G, Desantis O, Piazza O, Servillo G, Tufano R. Navigator and Smartpilot are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing. Minerv Anesth. 2015;81:1163–9. Cirillo V, Marinosci G, Robertis E, Iacono C, Romano G, Desantis O, Piazza O, Servillo G, Tufano R. Navigator and Smartpilot are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing. Minerv Anesth. 2015;81:1163–9.
15.
go back to reference Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landals A, Bolchut N, Dussaussoy C, Trillat B, Beydon L, Samain E, Sessler D, Fischler M. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:546–57.CrossRef Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landals A, Bolchut N, Dussaussoy C, Trillat B, Beydon L, Samain E, Sessler D, Fischler M. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:546–57.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Struys M, Sahinovic M, Lichtenbelt B, Vereecke H, Absalom A. Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(1):38–47.CrossRef Struys M, Sahinovic M, Lichtenbelt B, Vereecke H, Absalom A. Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(1):38–47.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Van Den Berg J, Vereecke H, Proost J, Eleveld D, Wietasch J, Absalom A, Struys M. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anesthetic drug administration. Br J Anesth. 2017;118(1):44–57.CrossRef Van Den Berg J, Vereecke H, Proost J, Eleveld D, Wietasch J, Absalom A, Struys M. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anesthetic drug administration. Br J Anesth. 2017;118(1):44–57.CrossRef
19.
Metadata
Title
Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia
Authors
Carl Tams
Noah Syroid
Terrie Vasilopoulos
Ken Johnson
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00298-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2019 Go to the issue