Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2019

01-06-2019 | Original Research

Effect of neuromuscular blockade on transcranial electric motor evoked potentials during surgical correction for idiopathic scoliosis under total intravenous anesthesia

Authors: Hai-yan Liu, Tian-jiao Xia, Ze-zhang Zhu, Xing Zhao, Yue Qian, Zheng-liang Ma, Xiao-ping Gu

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) play an important role in reducing the risk of iatrogenic paraplegia. TCeMEPs could be obviously suppressed by neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The aims of this study were to examine the effects of NMB on TCeMEPs and to determine an appropriate level of partial neuromuscular blockade (pNMB) for TCeMEPs during surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). All patients were maintained with TIVA. The pNMB levels were classified into five phases: one or two train-of-four (TOF) counts (TOF1); three TOF counts, or T4/T1 (TOFR, T1,4, first or four twitch height of TOF) ≤ 15% (TOF2); TOFR at 16–25% (TOF3); TOFR at 26–50% (TOF4); and TOFR at 51–75% (TOF5). No neuromuscular blockade (nNMB) was achieved when TOFR was more than 75%. The absolute and relative latency, amplitude and area under curve (AUC), efficacy of TCeMEPs and rate of unexpected movement were compared among these phases. Neither the amplitude and AUC nor the efficacy of TCeMEPs were affected at TOF4−5 of abductor halluces muscles TCeMEPs (AH-TCeMEPs) or at TOF3−5 of tibialis anterior muscles TCeMEPs (TA-TCeMEPs) compared with nNMB. However, the rate of unexpected movement was increased significantly at TOF5 and nNMB compared with TOF1 and TOF4. The application of pNMB with TOFR aimed at 26–50% for AH-TCeMEPs or 16–50% for TA-TCeMEPs seems to be an appropriate regimen for TCeMEPs during surgical correction for idiopathic scoliosis under TIVA.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, Bacchin MR, Bonarelli S, Cioni A, Vommaro F, Fini N, Lolli F, Parisini P. The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 1):105–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1756-z.CrossRefPubMedCentral Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, Bacchin MR, Bonarelli S, Cioni A, Vommaro F, Fini N, Lolli F, Parisini P. The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 1):105–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00586-011-1756-z.CrossRefPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Sakamoto T, Kawaguchi M, Kakimoto M, Inoue S, Takahashi M, Furuya H. The effect of hypothermia on myogenic motor-evoked potentials to electrical stimulation with a single pulse and a train of pulses under propofol/ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia in rabbits. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(6):1692–7 (table of contents).CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto T, Kawaguchi M, Kakimoto M, Inoue S, Takahashi M, Furuya H. The effect of hypothermia on myogenic motor-evoked potentials to electrical stimulation with a single pulse and a train of pulses under propofol/ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia in rabbits. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(6):1692–7 (table of contents).CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sloan TB, Heyer EJ. Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19(5):430–43.CrossRefPubMed Sloan TB, Heyer EJ. Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19(5):430–43.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tsutsui S, Iwasaki H, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Minamide A, Nakagawa Y, Nishi H, Yoshida M. Augmentation of motor evoked potentials using multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(1):35–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9565-7.CrossRefPubMed Tsutsui S, Iwasaki H, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Minamide A, Nakagawa Y, Nishi H, Yoshida M. Augmentation of motor evoked potentials using multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(1):35–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10877-014-9565-7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Azabou E, Manel V, Andre-obadia N, Fischer C, Mauguiere F, Peiffer C, Lofaso F, Shils JL. Optimal parameters of transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials of the tibialis anterior muscle during pediatric scoliosis surgery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;43(4):243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2013.08.001.CrossRef Azabou E, Manel V, Andre-obadia N, Fischer C, Mauguiere F, Peiffer C, Lofaso F, Shils JL. Optimal parameters of transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials of the tibialis anterior muscle during pediatric scoliosis surgery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;43(4):243–50. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​neucli.​2013.​08.​001.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Kennelly NA, Patel PM, Partridge BL. Intraoperative monitoring of tibialis anterior muscle motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical stimulation during partial neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg. 1992;75(4):584–9.CrossRefPubMed Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Kennelly NA, Patel PM, Partridge BL. Intraoperative monitoring of tibialis anterior muscle motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical stimulation during partial neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg. 1992;75(4):584–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference van Dongen EP, ter Beek HT, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ, Langemeijer HJ, de Boer A, Boezeman EH. Within-patient variability of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation during two levels of partial neuromuscular blockade in aortic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(1):22–7.PubMed van Dongen EP, ter Beek HT, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ, Langemeijer HJ, de Boer A, Boezeman EH. Within-patient variability of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation during two levels of partial neuromuscular blockade in aortic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(1):22–7.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sloan TB, Erian R. Effect of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade on cortical motor evoked potentials. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(5):966–73.CrossRefPubMed Sloan TB, Erian R. Effect of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade on cortical motor evoked potentials. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(5):966–73.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kim WH, Lee JJ, Lee SM, Park MN, Park SK, Seo DW, Chung IS. Comparison of motor-evoked potentials monitoring in response to transcranial electrical stimulation in subjects undergoing neurosurgery with partial vs no neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(4):567–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes395.CrossRefPubMed Kim WH, Lee JJ, Lee SM, Park MN, Park SK, Seo DW, Chung IS. Comparison of motor-evoked potentials monitoring in response to transcranial electrical stimulation in subjects undergoing neurosurgery with partial vs no neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(4):567–76. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​bja/​aes395.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Kawaguchi M, Hayashi H, Horiuchi T, Inoue S, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Furuya H. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(3):930–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181617508 (table of contents).CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto Y, Kawaguchi M, Hayashi H, Horiuchi T, Inoue S, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Furuya H. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(3):930–4. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1213/​ane.​0b013e3181617508​ (table of contents).CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Oro J, Haghighi SS. Effects of altering core body temperature on somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in rats. Spine. 1992;17(5):498–503.CrossRefPubMed Oro J, Haghighi SS. Effects of altering core body temperature on somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in rats. Spine. 1992;17(5):498–503.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of neuromuscular blockade on transcranial electric motor evoked potentials during surgical correction for idiopathic scoliosis under total intravenous anesthesia
Authors
Hai-yan Liu
Tian-jiao Xia
Ze-zhang Zhu
Xing Zhao
Yue Qian
Zheng-liang Ma
Xiao-ping Gu
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0182-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2019 Go to the issue