Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Brief Communication

Safe transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring during posterior spinal fusion in two patients with cochlear implants

Authors: Joseph L. Yellin, Cheryl R. Wiggins, Alier J. Franco, Wudbhav N. Sankar

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have become a regular part of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery. Almost all of the relative contraindications to TES have come and gone. One exception is in the case of patients with a cochlear implant (CI). Herein we illustrate two cases of pediatric patients with CIs who underwent PSF using TES MEPs as part of IONM. In both instances the patients displayed no untoward effects from TES, and post-operatively both CIs were intact and functioning as they were prior to surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwartz D, Auerbach J, Dormans J, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. JBJS. 2007;89:2440–9.CrossRef Schwartz D, Auerbach J, Dormans J, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. JBJS. 2007;89:2440–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sutter M, Deletis V, Dvorak J, et al. Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(Suppl 2):S232–7.CrossRefPubMed Sutter M, Deletis V, Dvorak J, et al. Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(Suppl 2):S232–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jameson L. Transcranial motor evoked potentials. In: Koht A, et al., editors. Monitoring of the nervous system for Anesthesiologists and other health care professionals. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 27–45.CrossRef Jameson L. Transcranial motor evoked potentials. In: Koht A, et al., editors. Monitoring of the nervous system for Anesthesiologists and other health care professionals. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 27–45.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference MacDonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monitor Comp. 2006;20(5):347–77.CrossRef MacDonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monitor Comp. 2006;20(5):347–77.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schwartz D, Sestokas A, et al. Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery. Spine. 2011;36(13):1046–9.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz D, Sestokas A, et al. Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery. Spine. 2011;36(13):1046–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shah S, Wiggins C, et al. Spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery in children with spastic cerebral palsy: is it feasible and safe even with an active seizure disorder? Spine. 2011;Supplement: 85–85. Shah S, Wiggins C, et al. Spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery in children with spastic cerebral palsy: is it feasible and safe even with an active seizure disorder? Spine. 2011;Supplement: 85–85.
7.
go back to reference MacDonald DB, Deletis V. Safety issues during surgical monitoring. In: Nuwer MR, editor. Intraoperative monitoring of neural function (Vol. 8). Handbook of clinical neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 929–45. MacDonald DB, Deletis V. Safety issues during surgical monitoring. In: Nuwer MR, editor. Intraoperative monitoring of neural function (Vol. 8). Handbook of clinical neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 929–45.
8.
go back to reference MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19(5):416–29.CrossRefPubMed MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19(5):416–29.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cochlear Corporation©. Nucleus cochlear implants, important information: Warnings, precautions and electromagnetic compatibility. Sydney: Cochlear Corporation©; 2012. Cochlear Corporation©. Nucleus cochlear implants, important information: Warnings, precautions and electromagnetic compatibility. Sydney: Cochlear Corporation©; 2012.
11.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services. NIDCD fact sheet: Cochlear implants. USA: National institute on deafness and other communication disorders; 2011. US Department of Health and Human Services. NIDCD fact sheet: Cochlear implants. USA: National institute on deafness and other communication disorders; 2011.
12.
go back to reference Francis L, Mohamed M, Patino M, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in pediatric surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;50(4):130–43.CrossRefPubMed Francis L, Mohamed M, Patino M, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in pediatric surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;50(4):130–43.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safe transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring during posterior spinal fusion in two patients with cochlear implants
Authors
Joseph L. Yellin
Cheryl R. Wiggins
Alier J. Franco
Wudbhav N. Sankar
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9730-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2016 Go to the issue