Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Research

The relative trending accuracy of noninvasive continuous hemoglobin monitoring during hemodialysis in critically ill patients

Authors: Hiroshi Yamada, Minako Saeki, Junko Ito, Kazuhiro Kawada, Aya Higurashi, Hiromi Funakoshi, Kohji Takeda

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The pulse CO-Oximeter (Radical-7; Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA) is a multi-wavelength spectrophotometric method for noninvasive continuous monitoring of hemoglobin (SpHb). Because evaluating the relative change in blood volume (ΔBV) is crucial to avoid hypovolemia and hypotension during hemodialysis, it would be of great clinical benefit if ΔBV could be estimated by measurement of SpHb during hemodialysis. The capability of the pulse CO-Oximeter to monitor ΔBV depends on the relative trending accuracy of SpHb. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the relative trending accuracy of SpHb by the pulse CO-Oximeter using Crit-Line as a reference device. In 12 patients who received hemodialysis (total 22 sessions) in the intensive care unit, ΔBV was determined from SpHb. Relative changes in blood volume determined from SpHb were calculated according to the equation: ΔBV(SpHb) = [starting SpHb]/[current SpHb] − 1. The absolute values of SpHb and hematocrit measured by Crit-Line (CL-Hct) showed poor correlation. On the contrary, linear regression analysis showed good correlation between ΔBV(SpHb) and the relative change in blood volume measured by Crit-Line [ΔBV(CL-Hct)] (r = 0.83; P ≤ 0.001). Bland–Altman analysis also revealed good agreement between ΔBV(SpHb) and ΔBV(CL-Hct) (bias, −0.77 %; precision, 3.41 %). Polar plot analysis revealed good relative trending accuracy of SpHb with an angular bias of 4.1° and radial limits of agreement of 24.4° (upper) and −16.2° (lower). The results of the current study indicate that SpHb measurement with the pulse CO-Oximeter has good relative trending accuracy.
Literature
1.
Bagshaw SM, Brophy PD, Cruz D, Ronco C. Fluid balance as a biomarker: impact of fluid overload on outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2008;12(4):169.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
Payen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, Spies C, Reinhart K, Vincent JL. A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Locatelli F, Buoncristiani U, Canaud B, Kohler H, Petitclerc T, Zucchelli P. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys? Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2005;20(1):22–33.CrossRef
4.
Garzoni D, Keusch G, Kleinoeder T, Martin H, Dhondt A, Cremaschi L, Tatsis E, Ibrahim N, Boer W, Kuehne S, Claus M, Zahn M, Schuemann E, Engelmann J, Hickstein H, Wojke R, Gauly A, Passlick-Deetjen J. Reduced complications during hemodialysis by automatic blood volume controlled ultrafiltration. Int J Artif Organs. 2007;30(1):16–24.PubMed
5.
Steuer RR, Harris DH, Conis JM. A new optical technique for monitoring hematocrit and circulating blood volume: its application in renal dialysis. Dial Transplant. 1993;22(5):260–5.
6.
Shamir MY, Avramovich A, Smaka T. The current status of continuous noninvasive measurement of total, carboxy, and methemoglobin concentration. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):972–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(5):1180–92.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Dasselaar JJ, Huisman RM, DE Jong PE, Franssen CF. Relative blood volume measurements during hemodialysis: comparisons between three noninvasive devices. Hemodial Int. 2007;11(4):448–55.
9.
Lamhaut L, Apriotesei R, Combes X, Lejay M, Carli P, Vivien B. Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue(R) with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(3):548–54.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Macknet MR, Allard M, Applegate 2nd RL, Rook J. The accuracy of noninvasive and continuous total hemoglobin measurement by pulse CO-oximetry in human subjects undergoing hemodilution. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(6):1424–6.
11.
Colquhoun DA, Forkin KT, Durieux ME, Thiele RH. Ability of the Masimo pulse CO-Oximeter to detect changes in hemoglobin. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26(2):69–73.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Catherine K, Levrat Q, Debaene B, Mimoz O. Accuracy of a continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(10):2277–82.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(3):536–46.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Giraud B, Frasca D, Debaene B, Mimoz O. Comparison of haemoglobin measurement methods in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(6):946–54.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Mitra S, Chamney P, Greenwood R, Farrington K. The relationship between systemic and whole-body hematocrit is not constant during ultrafiltration on hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(2):463–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Booth J, Pinney J, Davenport A. Do changes in relative blood volume monitoring correlate to hemodialysis-associated hypotension? Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;117(3):c179–83.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Miller RD, Ward TA, Shiboski SC, Cohen NH. A comparison of three methods of hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(4):858–63.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The relative trending accuracy of noninvasive continuous hemoglobin monitoring during hemodialysis in critically ill patients
Authors
Hiroshi Yamada
Minako Saeki
Junko Ito
Kazuhiro Kawada
Aya Higurashi
Hiromi Funakoshi
Kohji Takeda
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9574-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2015 Go to the issue

Original Research

Effect of mild hypocapnia on hemodynamic and bispectral index responses to tracheal intubation during propofol anesthesia in children

Commentary

4Ts scoring with hemofiltration or hemodialysis clotting

OriginalPaper

Accuracy of bedside glucometry in critically ill children with peripheral hypoperfusion

Original Paper

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3 % desflurane

Original Research

Morphological analysis of peripheral arterial signals in Takayasu’s arteritis

Original Research

Pulse oximetry-derived respiratory rate in general care floor patients