Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Immunology 5/2018

Open Access 01-07-2018 | Original Article

Biweekly Hizentra® in Primary Immunodeficiency: a Multicenter, Observational Cohort Study (IBIS)

Authors: Alessandra Vultaggio, Chiara Azzari, Silvia Ricci, Baldassarre Martire, Valentina Palladino, Vera Gallo, Antonio Pecoraro, Claudio Pignata, Giuseppe Spadaro, Simona Graziani, Viviana Moschese, Antonino Trizzino, Giorgio Maria Boggia, Andrea Matucci

Published in: Journal of Clinical Immunology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy is a standard treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs). Hizentra®, a 20% human subcutaneous IgG (SCIG), is approved for biweekly administration for PIDs. The aim of the multicenter IBIS study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy of biweekly Hizentra® compared with previous IVIG or SCIG treatment regimens in patients with PIDs. The study consisted of a 12-month retrospective period followed by 12-month prospective observational period. The main endpoints included pre-infusion IgG concentrations, proportion of patients with serious bacterial infections (SBIs), other infections, hospitalizations due to PID-related illnesses, and days with antibiotics during the study periods. Of the 36 patients enrolled in the study, 35 patients continued the study (mean age 26.1 ± 14.4 years; 68.6% male). The mean pre-infusion IgG levels for prior immunoglobulin regimens during the retrospective period (7.84 ± 2.09 g/L) and the prospective period (8.55 ± 1.76 g/L) did not show any significant variations (p = 0.4964). The mean annual rate of SBIs/patient was 0.063 ± 0.246 for both prospective and retrospective periods. No hospitalizations related to PIDs were reported during the prospective period versus one in the retrospective period. All patients were either very (76.5%) or quite (23.5%) satisfied with biweekly Hizentra® at the end of the study. In conclusion, the IBIS study provided real-world evidence on the efficacy of biweekly Hizentra® in patients with PIDs, thus verifying the data generated by the pharmacometric modeling and simulation study in a normal clinical setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Picard C, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, et al. Primary immunodeficiency diseases: an update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee for Primary Immunodeficiency 2015. J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(8):696–726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Picard C, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, et al. Primary immunodeficiency diseases: an update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee for Primary Immunodeficiency 2015. J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(8):696–726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
go back to reference Bousfiha AA, Jeddane L, Ailal F, Benhsaien I, Mahlaoui N, Casanova JL, et al. Primary immunodeficiency diseases worldwide: more common than generally thought. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed Bousfiha AA, Jeddane L, Ailal F, Benhsaien I, Mahlaoui N, Casanova JL, et al. Primary immunodeficiency diseases worldwide: more common than generally thought. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Modell V, Gee B, Lewis DB, Orange JS, Roifman CM, Routes JM, et al. Global study of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PI)—diagnosis, treatment, and economic impact: an updated report from the Jeffrey Modell Foundation. Immunol Res. 2011;51(1):61–70.CrossRefPubMed Modell V, Gee B, Lewis DB, Orange JS, Roifman CM, Routes JM, et al. Global study of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PI)—diagnosis, treatment, and economic impact: an updated report from the Jeffrey Modell Foundation. Immunol Res. 2011;51(1):61–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Seligmann M, Cunningham-Rundles C, Hanson L, et al. IUIS/WHO notice. Appropriate uses of human immunoglobulin in clinical practice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1983;52(2):417–22. Seligmann M, Cunningham-Rundles C, Hanson L, et al. IUIS/WHO notice. Appropriate uses of human immunoglobulin in clinical practice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1983;52(2):417–22.
7.
go back to reference Ammann AJ, Ashman RF, Buckley RH, Hardie WR, Krantmann HJ, Nelson J, et al. Use of intravenous γ-globulin in antibody immunodeficiency: results of a multicenter controlled trial. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1982;22(1):60–7.CrossRefPubMed Ammann AJ, Ashman RF, Buckley RH, Hardie WR, Krantmann HJ, Nelson J, et al. Use of intravenous γ-globulin in antibody immunodeficiency: results of a multicenter controlled trial. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1982;22(1):60–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Buckley RH, Schiff RI. The use of intravenous immune globulin in immunodeficiency diseases. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(2):110–7.CrossRefPubMed Buckley RH, Schiff RI. The use of intravenous immune globulin in immunodeficiency diseases. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(2):110–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hamrock DJ. Adverse events associated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Int Immunopharmacol. 2006;6(4):535–42.CrossRefPubMed Hamrock DJ. Adverse events associated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Int Immunopharmacol. 2006;6(4):535–42.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Rojavin MA, Hubsch A, Lawo JP. Quantitative evidence of wear-off effect at the end of the intravenous IgG (IVIG) dosing cycle in primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2016;36(3):210–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rojavin MA, Hubsch A, Lawo JP. Quantitative evidence of wear-off effect at the end of the intravenous IgG (IVIG) dosing cycle in primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2016;36(3):210–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Jolles S, Bernatowska E, De Gracia J, et al. Efficacy and safety of Hizentra® in patients with primary immunodeficiency after a dose-equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy. Clin Immunol. 2011;141(1):90–102.CrossRefPubMed Jolles S, Bernatowska E, De Gracia J, et al. Efficacy and safety of Hizentra® in patients with primary immunodeficiency after a dose-equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy. Clin Immunol. 2011;141(1):90–102.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hagan JB, Fasano MB, Spector S, Wasserman RL, Melamed I, Rojavin MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, IgPro20, in patients with primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(5):734–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hagan JB, Fasano MB, Spector S, Wasserman RL, Melamed I, Rojavin MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, IgPro20, in patients with primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(5):734–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Berger M. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Immunol. 2004;112(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed Berger M. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Immunol. 2004;112(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shapiro RS. Why I use subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(2):95–8.CrossRef Shapiro RS. Why I use subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(2):95–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lingman-Framme J, Fasth A. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: an evidence-based review. Drugs. 2013;73(12):1307–19.CrossRefPubMed Lingman-Framme J, Fasth A. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: an evidence-based review. Drugs. 2013;73(12):1307–19.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Samaan K, Levasseur MC, Decaluwe H, St-Cyr C, Chapdelaine H, Des Roches A, et al. SCIg vs IVIg: let’s give patients the choice! J Clin Immunol. 2014;34(6):611–4.CrossRefPubMed Samaan K, Levasseur MC, Decaluwe H, St-Cyr C, Chapdelaine H, Des Roches A, et al. SCIg vs IVIg: let’s give patients the choice! J Clin Immunol. 2014;34(6):611–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Landersdorfer CB, Bexon M, Edelman J, Rojavin M, Kirkpatrick CMJ, Lu J, et al. Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of biweekly subcutaneous immunoglobulin dosing in primary immunodeficiency. Postgrad Med. 2013;125(6):53–61.CrossRefPubMed Landersdorfer CB, Bexon M, Edelman J, Rojavin M, Kirkpatrick CMJ, Lu J, et al. Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of biweekly subcutaneous immunoglobulin dosing in primary immunodeficiency. Postgrad Med. 2013;125(6):53–61.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wasserman RL, Stein MR, Younger MEM, Fatteh S, Haddad E. 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin dosed biweekly for primary immunodeficiency. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;117(1):93–4.CrossRefPubMed Wasserman RL, Stein MR, Younger MEM, Fatteh S, Haddad E. 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin dosed biweekly for primary immunodeficiency. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;117(1):93–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Gustafson R, Gardulf A, Hansen S, Leibl H, Engl W, Lindén M, et al. Rapid subcutaneous immunoglobulin administration every second week results in high and stable serum immunoglobulin G levels in patients with primary antibody deficiencies. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;152(2):274–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gustafson R, Gardulf A, Hansen S, Leibl H, Engl W, Lindén M, et al. Rapid subcutaneous immunoglobulin administration every second week results in high and stable serum immunoglobulin G levels in patients with primary antibody deficiencies. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;152(2):274–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Sidhu J, Rojavin M, Pfister M, Edelman J. Enhancing patient flexibility of subcutaneous immunoglobulin G dosing: pharmacokinetic outcomes of various maintenance and loading regimens in the treatment of primary immunodeficiency. Biol Ther. 2014;4(1–2):41–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sidhu J, Rojavin M, Pfister M, Edelman J. Enhancing patient flexibility of subcutaneous immunoglobulin G dosing: pharmacokinetic outcomes of various maintenance and loading regimens in the treatment of primary immunodeficiency. Biol Ther. 2014;4(1–2):41–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Bonagura VR, Marchlewski R, Cox A, Rosenthal DW. Biologic IgG level in primary immunodeficiency disease: the IgG level that protects against recurrent infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(1):210–2.CrossRefPubMed Bonagura VR, Marchlewski R, Cox A, Rosenthal DW. Biologic IgG level in primary immunodeficiency disease: the IgG level that protects against recurrent infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(1):210–2.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Orange J, Belohradsky BH, Berger M, et al. Evaluation of correlation between dose and clinical outcomes in subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;169(2):172–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Orange J, Belohradsky BH, Berger M, et al. Evaluation of correlation between dose and clinical outcomes in subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;169(2):172–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Gardulf A. Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies. BioDrugs. 2007;21(2):105–16.CrossRefPubMed Gardulf A. Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies. BioDrugs. 2007;21(2):105–16.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Albin S, Cunningham-Rundles C. An update on the use of immunoglobulin for the treatment of immunodeficiency disorders. Immunotherapy. 2014;6(10):1113–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Albin S, Cunningham-Rundles C. An update on the use of immunoglobulin for the treatment of immunodeficiency disorders. Immunotherapy. 2014;6(10):1113–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Shapiro R. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy by rapid push is preferred to infusion by pump: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(2):301–7.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro R. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy by rapid push is preferred to infusion by pump: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(2):301–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Jolles S, Orange JS, Gardulf A, Stein MR, Shapiro R, Borte M, et al. Current treatment options with immunoglobulin G for the individualization of care in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;179(2):146–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jolles S, Orange JS, Gardulf A, Stein MR, Shapiro R, Borte M, et al. Current treatment options with immunoglobulin G for the individualization of care in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;179(2):146–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Biweekly Hizentra® in Primary Immunodeficiency: a Multicenter, Observational Cohort Study (IBIS)
Authors
Alessandra Vultaggio
Chiara Azzari
Silvia Ricci
Baldassarre Martire
Valentina Palladino
Vera Gallo
Antonio Pecoraro
Claudio Pignata
Giuseppe Spadaro
Simona Graziani
Viviana Moschese
Antonino Trizzino
Giorgio Maria Boggia
Andrea Matucci
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0271-9142
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2592
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-018-0528-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Journal of Clinical Immunology 5/2018 Go to the issue