Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2021

01-06-2021

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amulet device: to tug or not to tug?

Authors: Mandy K Salmon, Karen Eich Hammer, Jens Vinge Nygaard, Kasper Korsholm, Peter Johansen, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) involves a “tug test,” in which implanters pull on the device delivery cable to ensure stable occluder placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the recommendation to perform the tug test, by comparing forces exerted on the device during deployment and subsequent tug test. A secondary objective was to simulate forces experienced on left atrial appendage tissue by placement of a 20-mm device.

Methods

The AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ device was used for occlusion. A force transducer recorded forces in the delivery cable during deployment and tug test in 23 patients. Four patients were excluded due to improper transducer placement or technical errors in data collection. For a 20-mm device, the force imparted on the circumferential contact with left atrial appendage wall tissue was simulated in a computational model, using the measured externally applied forces as inputs.

Results

For devices < 25-mm in diameter, disc deployment force (mean ± standard deviation) was 1.72 ± 0.43 N, and tug force was 1.01 ± 0.59 N. For devices ≥ 25 mm in diameter, disc deployment force was 2.96 ± 0.57 N, and tug force was 1.04 ± 0.24 N. The increase in disc deployment force compared with tug test force was statistically significant for small devices (< 25 mm; p = 0.049) and large devices (≥ 25 mm; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Increased force applied on the AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ device during disc deployment compared with during tug test was statistically significant, suggesting that the tug test is redundant in most cases for checking device stability.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
4.
go back to reference Issa Z, Miller J, Zipes D. Atrial fibrillation. In: Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology E-Book: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 535. Issa Z, Miller J, Zipes D. Atrial fibrillation. In: Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology E-Book: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 535.
5.
go back to reference Landmesser U, Schmidt B, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Lam SCC, Park JW, Tarantini G, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER amulet device: periprocedural and early clinical/echocardiographic data from a global prospective observational study. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:867–76. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00493.CrossRefPubMed Landmesser U, Schmidt B, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Lam SCC, Park JW, Tarantini G, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER amulet device: periprocedural and early clinical/echocardiographic data from a global prospective observational study. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:867–76. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4244/​EIJ-D-17-00493.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sadd MH. Elasticity: theory, applications, numbers. Waltham: Elsevier Academic Press; 2014. Sadd MH. Elasticity: theory, applications, numbers. Waltham: Elsevier Academic Press; 2014.
Metadata
Title
Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amulet device: to tug or not to tug?
Authors
Mandy K Salmon
Karen Eich Hammer
Jens Vinge Nygaard
Kasper Korsholm
Peter Johansen
Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00821-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2021 Go to the issue