Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2017

01-09-2017

The anticoagulant effect of heparin during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban

Authors: L. C. Brendel, F. Dobler, G. Hessling, J. Michel, S. L. Braun, A. L. Steinsiek, P. Groha, R. Eckl, I. Deisenhofer, A. Hyseni, M. Roest, I. Ott, B. Steppich

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Measuring the anticoagulant effect of heparin during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban is challenging, since the activated coagulation time (ACT) does not seem to reflect the true anticoagulant activity of these drugs. We therefore evaluated coagulation properties of apixaban and rivaroxaban during RFA by different coagulation assays to better monitor periprocedural hemostasis.

Methods

The study included 90 patients (61 ± 12 years) with atrial fibrillation who underwent RFA procedures. Patients received 20 mg rivaroxaban (n = 73) once or 5 mg apixaban (n = 17) twice daily 4 weeks prior to the procedure. During RFA, unfractionated heparin i.v. was given to maintain an ACT of 250–300 s. Blood samples were taken before and 10, 60, and 360 min after heparin administration.

Results

Heparin displayed a lower anti-Xa activity in rivaroxaban-treated patients compared to apixaban-treated patients. In contrast, D-dimer and prothrombin fragment F1+2 plasma levels indicated a higher activation of the coagulation cascade in apixaban/heparin than in rivaroxaban/heparin patients. This discordant coagulative state measured in vitro had no clinical impact in terms of bleeding or thromboembolic complications.

Conclusion

We found different biochemical responses to rivaroxaban/heparin and apixaban/heparin during RFA. Precaution is necessary when monitoring periprocedural hemostasis in DOAC patients to avoid mismanagement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hicks T, Stewart F, Eisinga A. NOACs versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2016;18:3(1). Hicks T, Stewart F, Eisinga A. NOACs versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2016;18:3(1).
3.
4.
go back to reference Hirsh J, Bauer KA, Donati MB, Gould M, Samama MM, Weitz JI. American College of Chest Physicians. Parenteral anticoagulants: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133:141S–59S.CrossRefPubMed Hirsh J, Bauer KA, Donati MB, Gould M, Samama MM, Weitz JI. American College of Chest Physicians. Parenteral anticoagulants: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133:141S–59S.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dillier R, Ammar S, Hessling G, Kaess B, Pavaci H, Buiatti A, et al. Safety of continuous periprocedural rivaroxaban for patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:576–82.CrossRefPubMed Dillier R, Ammar S, Hessling G, Kaess B, Pavaci H, Buiatti A, et al. Safety of continuous periprocedural rivaroxaban for patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:576–82.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kaess BM, Ammar S, Reents T, Dillier R, Lennerz C, Semmler V, et al. Comparison of safety of left atrial catheter ablation procedures for atrial arrhythmias under continuous anticoagulation with apixaban versus phenprocoumon. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:47–51.CrossRefPubMed Kaess BM, Ammar S, Reents T, Dillier R, Lennerz C, Semmler V, et al. Comparison of safety of left atrial catheter ablation procedures for atrial arrhythmias under continuous anticoagulation with apixaban versus phenprocoumon. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:47–51.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nairooz R, Ayoub K, Sardar P, Payne J, Almomani A, Pothineni NV et al. Uninterrupted new oral anticoagulants compared with uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists in ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 2015;26. Nairooz R, Ayoub K, Sardar P, Payne J, Almomani A, Pothineni NV et al. Uninterrupted new oral anticoagulants compared with uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists in ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 2015;26.
8.
go back to reference Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, Feit F, Kleiman NS, Jackman JD, et al. Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:853–63.CrossRefPubMed Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, Feit F, Kleiman NS, Jackman JD, et al. Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:853–63.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hyseni A, Kemperman H, de Lange DW, Kesecioglu J, de Groot PG, Roest M. Increased mortality in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients with high levels of coagulation factor VIIa. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:2111–7.CrossRefPubMed Hyseni A, Kemperman H, de Lange DW, Kesecioglu J, de Groot PG, Roest M. Increased mortality in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients with high levels of coagulation factor VIIa. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:2111–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pollack CV Jr. Coagulation assessment with the new generation of oral anticoagulants. Emerg Med J. 2015;18:2015–204891. Pollack CV Jr. Coagulation assessment with the new generation of oral anticoagulants. Emerg Med J. 2015;18:2015–204891.
11.
go back to reference Adcock DM, Gosselin R. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the laboratory: 2015 review. Thromb Res. 2015;136:7–12.CrossRefPubMed Adcock DM, Gosselin R. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the laboratory: 2015 review. Thromb Res. 2015;136:7–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hirsh J, O’Donnell M, Eikelboom JW. Beyond unfractionated heparin and warfarin: current and future advances. Circulation. 2007;116:552–60.CrossRefPubMed Hirsh J, O’Donnell M, Eikelboom JW. Beyond unfractionated heparin and warfarin: current and future advances. Circulation. 2007;116:552–60.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Perzborn E, Strassburger J, Wilmen A, Pohlmann J, Roehrig S, Schlemmer KH, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of the novel antithrombotic agent BAY 59-7939—an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:514–21.CrossRefPubMed Perzborn E, Strassburger J, Wilmen A, Pohlmann J, Roehrig S, Schlemmer KH, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of the novel antithrombotic agent BAY 59-7939—an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:514–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Haas S. Facts and artefacts of coagulation assays for factor Xa inhibitors. Thromb Haemost. 2010;103:686–8.CrossRefPubMed Haas S. Facts and artefacts of coagulation assays for factor Xa inhibitors. Thromb Haemost. 2010;103:686–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gosselin RC, Francart SJ, Hawes EM, Moll S, Dager WE, Adcock DM. Heparin-calibrated chromogenic anti-Xa activity measurements in patients receiving rivaroxaban: can this test be used to quantify drug level? Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49:777–83.CrossRefPubMed Gosselin RC, Francart SJ, Hawes EM, Moll S, Dager WE, Adcock DM. Heparin-calibrated chromogenic anti-Xa activity measurements in patients receiving rivaroxaban: can this test be used to quantify drug level? Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49:777–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Snipelisky D, Ray JC, Ung R, Duart M, Kauffman C, Kusumoto F. A comparison of bleeding complications between warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;41:231–6.CrossRefPubMed Snipelisky D, Ray JC, Ung R, Duart M, Kauffman C, Kusumoto F. A comparison of bleeding complications between warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;41:231–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Snipelisky D, Kauffman C, Prussak K, Johns G, Venkatachalam K, Kusumoto F. A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;35:29–33.CrossRefPubMed Snipelisky D, Kauffman C, Prussak K, Johns G, Venkatachalam K, Kusumoto F. A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;35:29–33.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sairaku A, Yoshida Y, Ando M, Hirayama H, Nakano Y, Kihara Y. A head-to-head comparison of periprocedural coagulability under anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus dabigatran in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Clin Drug Investig. 2013;33:847–53.CrossRefPubMed Sairaku A, Yoshida Y, Ando M, Hirayama H, Nakano Y, Kihara Y. A head-to-head comparison of periprocedural coagulability under anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus dabigatran in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Clin Drug Investig. 2013;33:847–53.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The anticoagulant effect of heparin during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban
Authors
L. C. Brendel
F. Dobler
G. Hessling
J. Michel
S. L. Braun
A. L. Steinsiek
P. Groha
R. Eckl
I. Deisenhofer
A. Hyseni
M. Roest
I. Ott
B. Steppich
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-017-0274-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2017 Go to the issue