Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2017

01-04-2017

Atrial fibrillation inducibility during cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation as a predictor of clinical atrial fibrillation. A meta-analysis

Authors: Jorge Romero, Juan Carlos Diaz, Luigi Di Biase, Saurabh Kumar, David Briceno, Usha B. Tedrow, Carolina R. Valencia, Samuel H. Baldinger, Bruce Koplan, Laurence M. Epstein, Roy John, Gregory F. Michaud, William G. Stevenson

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) are two separate entities that coexist in a significant percentage of patients. We sought to investigate whether AF inducibility during CTI AFL ablation predicted the occurrence of AF at follow-up after successful AFL ablation.

Methods

A systemic review of Medline, Cochrane, and Embase was done for all the clinical studies in which assessment of AF inducibility in patients undergoing ablation for CTI AFL was performed. Given the low heterogeneity (i.e., I 2 <25), we used a fixed effect model for our analysis.

Results

A total of 10 studies (4 prospective and 6 retrospective) with a total of 1299 patients (male, 73%; mean age 59 ± 11 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. During a mean follow-up period of 23 ± 7.6 months, 407 patients (31%) developed AF during AFL ablation. The overall incidence for new-onset AF during follow-up was 29% (47% in the group with inducible AF vs. 21% in the non-inducible group). The odds ratio (OR) for developing AF after AFL ablation in patients with AF inducibility for all studies combined was 3.72, 95% CI 2.83–4.89 [prospective studies (OR 5.52, 95% CI 3.23–9.41) vs. retrospective studies (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.35–4.45)].

Conclusions

Although ablation for CTI AFL is highly effective, AF continues to be a long-term risk for individuals undergoing this procedure. AF induced by pacing protocols in patients undergoing CTI AFL predicts for future AF. Inducible AF is a clinically relevant finding that may help guide decisions for long-term anticoagulation after successful typical AFL ablation especially in patients with elevated CHADS-VASc scores (≥2) and in considering prophylactic PVI during CTI AFL ablation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tomson TT et al. Risk of stroke and atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(11):1779–84.CrossRefPubMed Tomson TT et al. Risk of stroke and atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(11):1779–84.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Verma A et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMed Verma A et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wells GA, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analyses. Accessed on April 12th, 2016. Wells GA, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analyses. Accessed on April 12th, 2016.
5.
8.
go back to reference Baszko A et al. Occurrence of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation: the significance of intra-atrial conduction and atrial vulnerability. J Electrocardiol. 2003;36(3):219–25.CrossRefPubMed Baszko A et al. Occurrence of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation: the significance of intra-atrial conduction and atrial vulnerability. J Electrocardiol. 2003;36(3):219–25.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Hsieh MH et al. Recurrent atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus: a very long-term follow-up of 333 patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2002;7(3):225–31.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh MH et al. Recurrent atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus: a very long-term follow-up of 333 patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2002;7(3):225–31.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Joza J, et al. Prognostic value of atrial fibrillation inducibility after right atrial flutter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2014. Joza J, et al. Prognostic value of atrial fibrillation inducibility after right atrial flutter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2014.
12.
go back to reference Paydak H et al. Atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter: time to onset, determinants, and clinical course. Circulation. 1998;98(4):315–22.CrossRefPubMed Paydak H et al. Atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter: time to onset, determinants, and clinical course. Circulation. 1998;98(4):315–22.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Philippon F et al. The risk of atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Circulation. 1995;92(3):430–5.CrossRefPubMed Philippon F et al. The risk of atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Circulation. 1995;92(3):430–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Anselme F et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: significance of palpitations and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block. Circulation. 1999;99(4):534–40.CrossRefPubMed Anselme F et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: significance of palpitations and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block. Circulation. 1999;99(4):534–40.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Laurent V et al. Incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation after ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;24(2):119–25.CrossRefPubMed Laurent V et al. Incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation after ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;24(2):119–25.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tai CT et al. Long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter: risk prediction of recurrent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMed Tai CT et al. Long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter: risk prediction of recurrent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Romero J, Estrada R, Holmes A, Goodman D, Roth N, Golive A, et al. Prediction of clinical atrial fibrillation induced during typical atrial flutter ablation. Circulation. 2014;130:A19766. Romero J, Estrada R, Holmes A, Goodman D, Roth N, Golive A, et al. Prediction of clinical atrial fibrillation induced during typical atrial flutter ablation. Circulation. 2014;130:A19766.
18.
go back to reference Chinitz JS et al. Atrial fibrillation is common after ablation of isolated atrial flutter during long-term follow-up. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(8):1029–33.CrossRefPubMed Chinitz JS et al. Atrial fibrillation is common after ablation of isolated atrial flutter during long-term follow-up. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(8):1029–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Chen K et al. HATCH score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):1483–9.CrossRefPubMed Chen K et al. HATCH score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):1483–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Katritsis D et al. Ablation therapy of type I atrial flutter may eradicate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(3):345–7.CrossRefPubMed Katritsis D et al. Ablation therapy of type I atrial flutter may eradicate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(3):345–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Navarrete A et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation at the time of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with atrial flutter without documented atrial fibrillation derives a better long-term benefit. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(1):34–8.CrossRefPubMed Navarrete A et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation at the time of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with atrial flutter without documented atrial fibrillation derives a better long-term benefit. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(1):34–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Steinberg JS et al. Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: the PReVENT AF Study I. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1567–72.CrossRefPubMed Steinberg JS et al. Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: the PReVENT AF Study I. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1567–72.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schneider R et al. Pulmonary vein triggers play an important role in the initiation of atrial flutter: initial results from the prospective randomized Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Atrial Flutter (Triple A) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(5):865–71.CrossRefPubMed Schneider R et al. Pulmonary vein triggers play an important role in the initiation of atrial flutter: initial results from the prospective randomized Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Atrial Flutter (Triple A) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(5):865–71.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wazni O et al. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;108(20):2479–83.CrossRefPubMed Wazni O et al. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;108(20):2479–83.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Mohanty S et al. Results from a single-blind, randomized study comparing the impact of different ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in coexistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (APPROVAL). Circulation. 2013;127(18):1853–60.CrossRefPubMed Mohanty S et al. Results from a single-blind, randomized study comparing the impact of different ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in coexistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (APPROVAL). Circulation. 2013;127(18):1853–60.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Maan A et al. Complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011;10(2):76–83.CrossRefPubMed Maan A et al. Complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011;10(2):76–83.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Deshmukh A et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013;128(19):2104–12.CrossRefPubMed Deshmukh A et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013;128(19):2104–12.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Atrial fibrillation inducibility during cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation as a predictor of clinical atrial fibrillation. A meta-analysis
Authors
Jorge Romero
Juan Carlos Diaz
Luigi Di Biase
Saurabh Kumar
David Briceno
Usha B. Tedrow
Carolina R. Valencia
Samuel H. Baldinger
Bruce Koplan
Laurence M. Epstein
Roy John
Gregory F. Michaud
William G. Stevenson
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0211-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 3/2017 Go to the issue