Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Multiple Pregnancy | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles

Authors: Dongna Hui, Xiaofang Han, Xiaocheng Wang, Wenjuan Ren, Xin Lei, Jianrong Liu, Lina Dong, Hong Li

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of morula stage transfer derived from post-thawed cleavage embryos undergoing overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study that included 392 FET cycles with 784 thawed embryos undergoing overnight culture between January 2014 and December 2018. Embryos were divided into three groups in terms of their status: 8–16 cells without morula (group I), one morula (group II), and two morulae (group III). The clinical outcomes of these cycles were then compared between the three groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to control for confounders.

Results

Group III was associated with a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–4.27; P = 0.005), implantation rate (OR 3.00; CI 1.75–5.16; P < 0.001), multiple pregnancy rate (OR 4.91; CI 2.11–11.40; P < 0.001), and live birth rate (OR 1.96; CI 1.10–3.49; P = 0.022) than group I. Group II had a higher live birth rate than group I after adjustment (OR 1.70; CI 1.04–2.79; P = 0.035). There was no difference in the rate of premature delivery when compared across the three groups after adjustment.

Conclusion

The transfer of morula stage embryos following the overnight culture of post-thawed cleavage embryos led to an improvement in the clinical outcomes of FET cycles. It is important to reduce the number of morula embryos transferred in order to achieve a singleton pregnancy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1067–80.CrossRef Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1067–80.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2–14.CrossRef Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2–14.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):1976–82.CrossRef Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):1976–82.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):389–92.CrossRef Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):389–92.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, Van Voorhis B, Seifer DB, Ball GD, et al. Society for assisted reproductive technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):541–6.CrossRef Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, Van Voorhis B, Seifer DB, Ball GD, et al. Society for assisted reproductive technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):541–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Belva F, Bonduelle M, Roelants M, Verheyen G, van Landuyt L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1610–20.CrossRef Belva F, Bonduelle M, Roelants M, Verheyen G, van Landuyt L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1610–20.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33.CrossRef Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guo L, Luo C, Quan S, Chen LN, Li H, Guo YC, et al. The outcome of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(12):1589–94.CrossRef Guo L, Luo C, Quan S, Chen LN, Li H, Guo YC, et al. The outcome of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(12):1589–94.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haas J, Meriano J, Bassil R, Barzilay E, Robert F. Prolonged culture of blastocysts after thawing as a tool for improving prediction of success. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(12):2195–9.CrossRef Haas J, Meriano J, Bassil R, Barzilay E, Robert F. Prolonged culture of blastocysts after thawing as a tool for improving prediction of success. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(12):2195–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Coticchio G, Lagalla C, Sturmey R, Pennetta F, Borini A. The enigmatic morula: mechanisms of development, cell fate determination, self-correction and implications for ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(4):422–38.CrossRef Coticchio G, Lagalla C, Sturmey R, Pennetta F, Borini A. The enigmatic morula: mechanisms of development, cell fate determination, self-correction and implications for ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(4):422–38.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Huisman GJ, Alberda AT, Leerentveld RA, Verhoeff A, Zeilmaker GH. A comparison of in vitro fertilization results after embryo transfer after 2, 3 and 4 days of embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(5):970–1.CrossRef Huisman GJ, Alberda AT, Leerentveld RA, Verhoeff A, Zeilmaker GH. A comparison of in vitro fertilization results after embryo transfer after 2, 3 and 4 days of embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(5):970–1.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grifo JA, Giatras K, Tang YX, Krey LC. Successful outcome with day 4 embryo transfer after preimplantation diagnosis for genetically transmitted diseases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1656–9.CrossRef Grifo JA, Giatras K, Tang YX, Krey LC. Successful outcome with day 4 embryo transfer after preimplantation diagnosis for genetically transmitted diseases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1656–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tao J, Tamis R, Fink K, Williams B, Nelson-White T, Craig R. The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1513–8.CrossRef Tao J, Tamis R, Fink K, Williams B, Nelson-White T, Craig R. The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1513–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Skorupski JC, Stein DE, Acholonu U, Field H, Keltz M. Successful pregnancy rates achieved with day 4 embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):788–91.CrossRef Skorupski JC, Stein DE, Acholonu U, Field H, Keltz M. Successful pregnancy rates achieved with day 4 embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):788–91.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pantos K, Makrakis E, Chronopoulou M, Biba M, Perdikaris A, Dafereras A. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):573–7.CrossRef Pantos K, Makrakis E, Chronopoulou M, Biba M, Perdikaris A, Dafereras A. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):573–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Yoon S-H, Koh MW, Lim J-H, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):423–8.CrossRef Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Yoon S-H, Koh MW, Lim J-H, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):423–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fabozzi G, Alteri A, Rega E, Starita MF, Piscitelli C, Giannini P, et al. Morphological assessment on day 4 and its prognostic power in selecting viable embryos for transfer. Zygote. 2016;24(4):477–84.CrossRef Fabozzi G, Alteri A, Rega E, Starita MF, Piscitelli C, Giannini P, et al. Morphological assessment on day 4 and its prognostic power in selecting viable embryos for transfer. Zygote. 2016;24(4):477–84.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22(6):632–46.CrossRef ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22(6):632–46.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sanchez T, Seidler EA, Gardner DK, Needleman D, Sakkas D. Will noninvasive methods surpass invasive for assessing gametes and embryos? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):730–7.CrossRef Sanchez T, Seidler EA, Gardner DK, Needleman D, Sakkas D. Will noninvasive methods surpass invasive for assessing gametes and embryos? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):730–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, Tabibnejad N. Transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen thawed cleavage stage embryos improved ongoing pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(2):511–6.CrossRef Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, Tabibnejad N. Transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen thawed cleavage stage embryos improved ongoing pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(2):511–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wei DM, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi YH, Zhang B, Chen ZJ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310–8.CrossRef Wei DM, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi YH, Zhang B, Chen ZJ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Glujovsky D, Farquhar C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):244–50.CrossRef Glujovsky D, Farquhar C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):244–50.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rijnders PM, Jansen CAM. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(10):2869–73.CrossRef Rijnders PM, Jansen CAM. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(10):2869–73.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S, Ma’mari Al N, Shavit T, Son W-Y, et al. Fresh transfer of day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach? Hum Reprod. 2019;34(1):44–51.CrossRef Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S, Ma’mari Al N, Shavit T, Son W-Y, et al. Fresh transfer of day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach? Hum Reprod. 2019;34(1):44–51.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:3.CrossRef Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:3.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dobson Samuel JA, Lao MT, Essam M, Varghese AC, Kannamannadiar J. Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):655–9.CrossRef Dobson Samuel JA, Lao MT, Essam M, Varghese AC, Kannamannadiar J. Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):655–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles
Authors
Dongna Hui
Xiaofang Han
Xiaocheng Wang
Wenjuan Ren
Xin Lei
Jianrong Liu
Lina Dong
Hong Li
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01708-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020 Go to the issue