Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Discarding IVF embryos: reporting on global practices

Authors: M. Simopoulou, K. Sfakianoudis, P. Giannelou, A. Rapani, E. Maziotis, P. Tsioulou, S. Grigoriadis, E. Simopoulos, D. Mantas, M. Lambropoulou, M. Koutsilieris, K. Pantos, J. C. Harper

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To provide a global scale report on a representative sample of the clinical embryology community depicting the practice of discarding supernumerary IVF embryos.

Methods

A web-based questionnaire titled “Anonymous questionnaire on embryo disposal practices” was designed in order to ensure anonymous participation of practicing clinical embryologists around the world.

Results

During a data collection period of 8 months, 703 filled-in questionnaires from 65 countries were acquired. According to the data acquired, the majority of practitioners, dispose of embryos by placing them directly in a trash can strictly dedicated for embryo disposal for both fresh and frozen cycles (39% and 36.7% respectively). Moreover, 66.4% of practitioners discard the embryos separately—case by case—at different time points during the day. Over half of embryologists (54%) wait until day 6 to discard the surplus embryos, while 65.5% do not implement a specially allocated incubator space as a designated waiting area prior to disposal. The majority of 63.1% reported that this is a witnessed procedure. The vast majority of embryologists (93%) do not employ different protocols for different groups of patients. Nonetheless, 17.8% reported the request to perform a ceremony for these embryos. Assessing the embryologists’ perspective, 59.5% of participants stated that the embryology practice would benefit from a universally accepted and practiced protocol.

Conclusion(s)

This study uniquely provides insight into global embryo disposal practices and trends. Results highlight the divergence between reported practices, while indicating the significance on standardization of practice, with embryologists acknowledging the need for a universally accepted protocol implementation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gardner DK, Balaban B. Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and “OMICS”: is looking good still important? Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22:704–18.PubMed Gardner DK, Balaban B. Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and “OMICS”: is looking good still important? Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22:704–18.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Antoniou N, Maziotis E, Rapani A, Bakas P, et al. Making IVF more effective through the evolution of prediction models: is prognosis the missing piece of the puzzle? Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018;64:305–23.PubMed Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Antoniou N, Maziotis E, Rapani A, Bakas P, et al. Making IVF more effective through the evolution of prediction models: is prognosis the missing piece of the puzzle? Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018;64:305–23.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, Antoniou N, Rapani A, Anifandis G, et al. Are computational applications the “crystal ball” in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1545–57.PubMedPubMedCentral Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, Antoniou N, Rapani A, Anifandis G, et al. Are computational applications the “crystal ball” in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1545–57.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Siristatidis C, Vogiatzi P, Pouliakis A, Trivella M, Papantoniou N, Bettocchi S. Predicting IVF outcome: a proposed web-based system using artificial intelligence. Vivo Athens Greece. 2016;30:507–12. Siristatidis C, Vogiatzi P, Pouliakis A, Trivella M, Papantoniou N, Bettocchi S. Predicting IVF outcome: a proposed web-based system using artificial intelligence. Vivo Athens Greece. 2016;30:507–12.
6.
go back to reference Van Voorhis B, Mejia RB. Single-embryo transfer point-it is the way forward. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:757.PubMed Van Voorhis B, Mejia RB. Single-embryo transfer point-it is the way forward. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:757.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Goedeke S, Daniels K, Thorpe M, du Preez E. The fate of unused embryos: discourses, action possibilities, and subject positions. Qual Health Res. 2017;27:1529–40.PubMed Goedeke S, Daniels K, Thorpe M, du Preez E. The fate of unused embryos: discourses, action possibilities, and subject positions. Qual Health Res. 2017;27:1529–40.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Melamed RMM, Bonetti TCDS, Braga DPDAF, Madaschi C, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: parents’ choices. Hum Fertil Camb Engl. 2009;12:185–90. Melamed RMM, Bonetti TCDS, Braga DPDAF, Madaschi C, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: parents’ choices. Hum Fertil Camb Engl. 2009;12:185–90.
9.
go back to reference Bruno C, Dudkiewicz-Sibony C, Berthaut I, Weil E, Brunet L, Fortier C, et al. Survey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: the crucial role of symbolic embryo representation. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2016;31:1508–14. Bruno C, Dudkiewicz-Sibony C, Berthaut I, Weil E, Brunet L, Fortier C, et al. Survey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: the crucial role of symbolic embryo representation. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2016;31:1508–14.
10.
go back to reference Svanberg AS, Boivin J, Hjelmstedt A, Bergh LA, Collins A, Bergh T. The impact of frozen embryos on emotional reactions during in vitro fertilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1110–4.PubMed Svanberg AS, Boivin J, Hjelmstedt A, Bergh LA, Collins A, Bergh T. The impact of frozen embryos on emotional reactions during in vitro fertilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1110–4.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bergues U, Sèle B. What fate lies in store for the cryopreserved human embryos in France? The French law leaves uncertainties. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1997;12:207–8. Bergues U, Sèle B. What fate lies in store for the cryopreserved human embryos in France? The French law leaves uncertainties. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1997;12:207–8.
12.
go back to reference Moutel G, Gregg E, Meningaud JP, Hervé C. Developments in the storage of embryos in France and the limitations of the laws of bioethics. Analysis of procedures in 17 storage centres and the destiny of stored embryos. Med Law. 2002;21:587–604.PubMed Moutel G, Gregg E, Meningaud JP, Hervé C. Developments in the storage of embryos in France and the limitations of the laws of bioethics. Analysis of procedures in 17 storage centres and the destiny of stored embryos. Med Law. 2002;21:587–604.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Bangsbøll S, Pinborg A, Yding Andersen C, Nyboe AA. Patients’ attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2004;19:2415–9. Bangsbøll S, Pinborg A, Yding Andersen C, Nyboe AA. Patients’ attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2004;19:2415–9.
14.
go back to reference Newton CR, Fisher J, Feyles V, Tekpetey F, Hughes L, Isacsson D. Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007;22:3124–8. Newton CR, Fisher J, Feyles V, Tekpetey F, Hughes L, Isacsson D. Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007;22:3124–8.
15.
go back to reference Hoffman DI, Zellman GL, Fair CC, Mayer JF, Zeitz JG, Gibbons WE, et al. Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1063–9.PubMed Hoffman DI, Zellman GL, Fair CC, Mayer JF, Zeitz JG, Gibbons WE, et al. Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1063–9.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Alvarez-Díaz JA. Embryo donation in developing countries. Gac Med Mex. 2010;146:228–41.PubMed Alvarez-Díaz JA. Embryo donation in developing countries. Gac Med Mex. 2010;146:228–41.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Sivaraman MAF. Using surplus embryos and research embryos in stem cell research: ethical viewpoints of Buddhist, Hindu and Catholic leaders in Malaysia on the permissibility of research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:129–49.PubMed Sivaraman MAF. Using surplus embryos and research embryos in stem cell research: ethical viewpoints of Buddhist, Hindu and Catholic leaders in Malaysia on the permissibility of research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:129–49.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Klock SC. Embryo disposition: the forgotten “child” of in vitro fertilization. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004;49:19–23.PubMed Klock SC. Embryo disposition: the forgotten “child” of in vitro fertilization. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004;49:19–23.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, Butler A, MacDougall K. Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:431–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, Butler A, MacDougall K. Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:431–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference de Lacey S. Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients’ thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007;22:1751–8. de Lacey S. Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients’ thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007;22:1751–8.
22.
go back to reference Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Van de Velde A, De Lissnyder E, et al. Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2009;24:896–905. Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Van de Velde A, De Lissnyder E, et al. Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2009;24:896–905.
23.
go back to reference McMahon CA, Saunders DM. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:140–7.PubMed McMahon CA, Saunders DM. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:140–7.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Laruelle C, Englert Y. Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants’ attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1047–50.PubMed Laruelle C, Englert Y. Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants’ attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1047–50.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Darlington N, Matson P. The fate of cryopreserved human embryos approaching their legal limit of storage within a West Australian in-vitro fertilization clinic. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1999;14:2343–4. Darlington N, Matson P. The fate of cryopreserved human embryos approaching their legal limit of storage within a West Australian in-vitro fertilization clinic. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1999;14:2343–4.
26.
go back to reference Hammarberg K, Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples’ decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:86–91.PubMed Hammarberg K, Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples’ decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:86–91.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Klock SC, Sheinin S, Kazer RR. The disposition of unused frozen embryos. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:69–70.PubMed Klock SC, Sheinin S, Kazer RR. The disposition of unused frozen embryos. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:69–70.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Fuscaldo G, Russell S, Gillam L. How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients’ views. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007;22:3129–38. Fuscaldo G, Russell S, Gillam L. How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients’ views. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007;22:3129–38.
29.
go back to reference Zarin I. English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN : a multilingual model. J Asiat. 2016;13:391–2. Zarin I. English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN : a multilingual model. J Asiat. 2016;13:391–2.
31.
go back to reference Tonkens R. The moral unacceptability of abandoning human embryos. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2016;34:52–69.PubMed Tonkens R. The moral unacceptability of abandoning human embryos. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2016;34:52–69.PubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Douglas T, Savulescu J. Destroying unwanted embryos in research. Talking Point on morality and human embryo research. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:307–12.PubMedPubMedCentral Douglas T, Savulescu J. Destroying unwanted embryos in research. Talking Point on morality and human embryo research. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:307–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Mallia P. Problems faced with legislating for IVF technology in a Roman Catholic country. Med Health Care Philos. 2010;13:77–87.PubMed Mallia P. Problems faced with legislating for IVF technology in a Roman Catholic country. Med Health Care Philos. 2010;13:77–87.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Mallia P. Developments in IVF legislation in a Catholic country. Med Health Care Philos. 2013;16:385–90.PubMed Mallia P. Developments in IVF legislation in a Catholic country. Med Health Care Philos. 2013;16:385–90.PubMed
37.
38.
go back to reference Appleby JB, Bredenoord AL. Should the 14-day rule for embryo research become the 28-day rule? EMBO Mol Med. 2018;10. Appleby JB, Bredenoord AL. Should the 14-day rule for embryo research become the 28-day rule? EMBO Mol Med. 2018;10.
40.
go back to reference Svanberg AS, Boivin J, Bergh T. Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:849–55.PubMed Svanberg AS, Boivin J, Bergh T. Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:849–55.PubMed
41.
go back to reference McMahon CA, Gibson F, Leslie G, Cohen J, Tennant C. Parents of 5-year-old in vitro fertilization children: psychological adjustment, parenting stress, and the influence of subsequent in vitro fertilization treatment. J Fam Psychol JFP J Div Fam Psychol Am Psychol Assoc Div. 43, 2003(17):361–9.PubMed McMahon CA, Gibson F, Leslie G, Cohen J, Tennant C. Parents of 5-year-old in vitro fertilization children: psychological adjustment, parenting stress, and the influence of subsequent in vitro fertilization treatment. J Fam Psychol JFP J Div Fam Psychol Am Psychol Assoc Div. 43, 2003(17):361–9.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Parry S. (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Soc Sci Med 1982. 2006;62:2349–59. Parry S. (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Soc Sci Med 1982. 2006;62:2349–59.
Metadata
Title
Discarding IVF embryos: reporting on global practices
Authors
M. Simopoulou
K. Sfakianoudis
P. Giannelou
A. Rapani
E. Maziotis
P. Tsioulou
S. Grigoriadis
E. Simopoulos
D. Mantas
M. Lambropoulou
M. Koutsilieris
K. Pantos
J. C. Harper
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01592-w

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2019 Go to the issue