Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Tympanotomy | Original Paper

Paracentesis as valve re-bubbling technique for Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft detachment

Authors: Alfonso Vasquez-Perez, Bruce Allan, Luis Fernandez-Vega Cueto, Francesco Aiello

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

We present a variation in the slit-lamp microscope re-bubbling technique for DMEK detachment in which a paracentesis is used as a self-sealing valve.

Methods

Of twenty-eight consecutive DMEK cases, five (18%) required re-bubbling. A 20-gauge side port blade was used to make a paracentesis in the inferior temporal quadrant. A 30-gauge cannula mounted on a 3 ml syringe was employed to inject air using the paracentesis as a valve allowing better control over intraocular pressure and percentage anterior chamber air fill.

Results

Graft re-attachment was achieved in all cases. One case required two re-bubbling procedures. There were no cases of pupil block glaucoma or other complications.

Conclusion

Slit-lamp re-bubbling is a practical and safe alternative to taking patients back to the operating room. Using a new paracentesis for valve action control over air injection with a blunt cannula adds better control and may help to reduce complications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ang M, Wilkins MR, Mehta JS, Tan D (2016) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 100(1):15–21PubMedCrossRef Ang M, Wilkins MR, Mehta JS, Tan D (2016) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 100(1):15–21PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Parekh M, Leon P, Ruzza A et al (2018) Graft detachment and rebubbling rate in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol 63(2):245–250PubMedCrossRef Parekh M, Leon P, Ruzza A et al (2018) Graft detachment and rebubbling rate in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol 63(2):245–250PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deng SX, Lee WB, Hammersmith KM et al (2018) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 125(2):295–310PubMedCrossRef Deng SX, Lee WB, Hammersmith KM et al (2018) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 125(2):295–310PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J (2006) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 25(8):987–990PubMedCrossRef Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J (2006) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 25(8):987–990PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Maier AK, Gundlach E, Schroeter J et al (2015) Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253(6):895–900CrossRef Maier AK, Gundlach E, Schroeter J et al (2015) Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253(6):895–900CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Greenrod EB, Jones MN, Kaye S, Larkin DF (2014) Center and surgeon effect on outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom. Am J Ophthalmol 158(5):957–966PubMedCrossRef Greenrod EB, Jones MN, Kaye S, Larkin DF (2014) Center and surgeon effect on outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom. Am J Ophthalmol 158(5):957–966PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fernandez Lopez E, Baydoun L, Gerber-Hollbach N et al (2016) Rebubbling techniques for graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 35(6):759–764PubMedCrossRef Fernandez Lopez E, Baydoun L, Gerber-Hollbach N et al (2016) Rebubbling techniques for graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 35(6):759–764PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sales CS, Straiko MD, Terry MA (2016) Novel technique for rebubbling DMEK grafts at the slit lamp using intravenous extension tubing. Cornea 35(4):582–585PubMedCrossRef Sales CS, Straiko MD, Terry MA (2016) Novel technique for rebubbling DMEK grafts at the slit lamp using intravenous extension tubing. Cornea 35(4):582–585PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pilger D, Wilkemeyer I, Schroeter J, Maier AB, Torun N (2017) Rebubbling in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: influence of pressure and duration of the intracameral air tamponade. Am J Ophthalmol 178:122–128PubMedCrossRef Pilger D, Wilkemeyer I, Schroeter J, Maier AB, Torun N (2017) Rebubbling in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: influence of pressure and duration of the intracameral air tamponade. Am J Ophthalmol 178:122–128PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chew FM, Teeluck K, Nanavaty MA (2018) A paracentesis to save time and money with re-bubbling after descemets membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Eye (London, England) 32(2):238–239CrossRef Chew FM, Teeluck K, Nanavaty MA (2018) A paracentesis to save time and money with re-bubbling after descemets membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Eye (London, England) 32(2):238–239CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Einan-Lifshitz A, Sorkin N, Boutin T et al (2018) Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and air tamponade in noniridectomized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 37(3):273–276PubMedCrossRef Einan-Lifshitz A, Sorkin N, Boutin T et al (2018) Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and air tamponade in noniridectomized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 37(3):273–276PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ampazas P, Droutsas K, Giallouros E, Schroeder FM, Sekundo W (2017) Comparison of 5% sulfur hexafluoride versus 100% air tamponade in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 36(10):1189–1194PubMed Ampazas P, Droutsas K, Giallouros E, Schroeder FM, Sekundo W (2017) Comparison of 5% sulfur hexafluoride versus 100% air tamponade in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 36(10):1189–1194PubMed
13.
Metadata
Title
Paracentesis as valve re-bubbling technique for Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft detachment
Authors
Alfonso Vasquez-Perez
Bruce Allan
Luis Fernandez-Vega Cueto
Francesco Aiello
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01295-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

International Ophthalmology 5/2020 Go to the issue