Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Intense Pulsed Light | Original Paper

Comparison of retinal layer thickness measurements obtained using two different swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging modes

Authors: Yo Sep Yoon, Chang Uk Park, Jun Ho Song, Jung Kee Min

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the retinal layer thickness values obtained using two swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) wide modes.

Methods

This study included fifty-four healthy eyes. Three-dimensional (3D) wide and 12 radial wide OCT scans were performed in each eye on the same day. Full retinal, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GC–IPL) thicknesses with fully automated segmentation obtained in 3D wide mode, and with semi-automated correction and fully automated segmentation obtained in 12 radial wide scan.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients for full retinal thickness measurements obtained by the two protocols with fully automated segmentation were from 0.958 to 0.996, 0.754–0.918 for GC–IPL thickness measurements, and 0.013–0.727 for RNFL thickness measurements, in the nine ETDRS subfields.

Conclusions

The full retinal thickness measurements determined using both fully automated segmentation algorithms were reliable and clinically acceptable. However, segmentation errors are shown when using the 12 radial wide scanning protocol with fully automated segmentation for measurement of RNFL and GC–IPL thickness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Esmaeelpour M, Povazay B, Hermann B et al (2010) Three-dimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:5260–5266CrossRef Esmaeelpour M, Povazay B, Hermann B et al (2010) Three-dimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:5260–5266CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tan CS, Ngo WK, Cheong KX (2015) Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 99:354–358CrossRef Tan CS, Ngo WK, Cheong KX (2015) Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 99:354–358CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tatham AJ, Marchase N, Weinreb RN (2014) Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept-source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts. Am J Ophthalmol 157:1022–1032CrossRef Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tatham AJ, Marchase N, Weinreb RN (2014) Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept-source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts. Am J Ophthalmol 157:1022–1032CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tan CS, Chan JC, Cheong KX, Ngo WK, Sadda SR (2015) Comparison of retinal thicknesses measured using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46:172–179CrossRef Tan CS, Chan JC, Cheong KX, Ngo WK, Sadda SR (2015) Comparison of retinal thicknesses measured using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46:172–179CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Copete S, Flores-Moreno I, Montero JA, Duker JS, Ruiz-Moreno JM (2014) Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 98:334–338CrossRef Copete S, Flores-Moreno I, Montero JA, Duker JS, Ruiz-Moreno JM (2014) Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 98:334–338CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matsuo Y, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Tomita M, Shirasawa M, Terasaki H (2013) Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7630–7636CrossRef Matsuo Y, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Tomita M, Shirasawa M, Terasaki H (2013) Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7630–7636CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW, Khwarg SI, Kim DM (2005) Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 112:2157–2163CrossRef Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW, Khwarg SI, Kim DM (2005) Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 112:2157–2163CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chang RT, Knight OJ, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma. Ophthalmology 116:2294–2299CrossRef Chang RT, Knight OJ, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma. Ophthalmology 116:2294–2299CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee HJ, Kim MS, Jo YJ, Kim JY (2015) Thickness of the macula, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layer in the epiretinal membrane: the repeatability study of optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:4554–4559CrossRef Lee HJ, Kim MS, Jo YJ, Kim JY (2015) Thickness of the macula, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layer in the epiretinal membrane: the repeatability study of optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:4554–4559CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, Beaton S, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS (2005) Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2012–2017CrossRef Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, Beaton S, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS (2005) Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2012–2017CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mwanza JC, Durbin MK, Budenz DL et al (2012) Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head. Ophthalmology 119:1151–1158CrossRef Mwanza JC, Durbin MK, Budenz DL et al (2012) Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head. Ophthalmology 119:1151–1158CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sato S, Hirooka K, Baba T, Tenkumo K, Nitta E, Shiraga F (2013) Correlation between the ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:3046–3051CrossRef Sato S, Hirooka K, Baba T, Tenkumo K, Nitta E, Shiraga F (2013) Correlation between the ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:3046–3051CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Min JK, Lee S, Kim JS, Woo JM, Yang HS (2017) Effects of diabetic macular edema on repeatability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements at the macular and peripapillary area using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 42:307–314CrossRef Min JK, Lee S, Kim JS, Woo JM, Yang HS (2017) Effects of diabetic macular edema on repeatability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements at the macular and peripapillary area using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 42:307–314CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of retinal layer thickness measurements obtained using two different swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging modes
Authors
Yo Sep Yoon
Chang Uk Park
Jun Ho Song
Jung Kee Min
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01276-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

International Ophthalmology 5/2020 Go to the issue