Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Retinal Detachment | Original Paper

Postoperative eccentric macular holes after surgery for vitreomacular interface diseases

Authors: Esat Yetkin, Mehmet Citirik, Mehmet Yasin Teke, Hasan Kiziltoprak

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of postoperative eccentric macular hole (ECMH) after epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole (MH), and idiopathic vitreomacular traction (VMT) surgery and discuss the underlying possible mechanisms.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out for 711 eyes of 711 consecutive patients who underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with ERM (396 eyes), MH (268 eyes), and VMT (47 eyes) surgery between 2010 and 2016. Mean follow-up time was 19 months.

Results

Eight patients developed ECMH (1.12%). Four of the patients were ERM, three patients were idiopathic full thickness MH, and one patient was ERM and lamellar pseudohole. There was no ECMH in patients with VMT. The average time of hole formation after vitrectomy was 7.25 weeks with a range from 2 to 15 weeks. Three patients developed 2 ECMH, and others had 1 ECMH. The location of the ECMH was mostly in the temporal of fovea. All patients were asymptomatic. No retinal detachment or choroidal neovascularization occurred in any patient and no additional intervention was attempted in the postoperative period in any case.

Conclusion

Postoperative ECMH may be seen after vitreomacular interface surgery. They are mostly asymptomatic, usually do not require additional intervention and often located in the parafoveal area. ILM peeling-induced muller cell damage, residual ILM contraction, and iatrogenic trauma may play a role as the underlying cause in our case series.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pournaras CJ, Emarah A, Petropoulos IK (2011) Idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane surgery and ILM peeling: anatomical and functional outcomes. Semin Ophthalmol 26:42–46CrossRef Pournaras CJ, Emarah A, Petropoulos IK (2011) Idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane surgery and ILM peeling: anatomical and functional outcomes. Semin Ophthalmol 26:42–46CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schumann RG, Gandorfer A, Eibl KH et al (2010) Sequential epiretinal membrane removal with internal limiting membrane peeling in brilliant blue G-assisted macular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1369–1372CrossRef Schumann RG, Gandorfer A, Eibl KH et al (2010) Sequential epiretinal membrane removal with internal limiting membrane peeling in brilliant blue G-assisted macular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1369–1372CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rubinstein A, Bates R, Benjamin L, Shaikh A (2005) Iatrogenic eccentric full thickness macular holes following vitrectomy with ILM peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Eye (Lond) 19:1333–1335CrossRef Rubinstein A, Bates R, Benjamin L, Shaikh A (2005) Iatrogenic eccentric full thickness macular holes following vitrectomy with ILM peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Eye (Lond) 19:1333–1335CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, Aihara M (2017) Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Retina 37(10):1813–1819CrossRef Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, Aihara M (2017) Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Retina 37(10):1813–1819CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Díaz-Valverde A, Wu L (2018) To peel or not to peel the ınternal lımıtıng membrane ın ıdıopathıc epıretınal membranes. Retina 1:S5–S11CrossRef Díaz-Valverde A, Wu L (2018) To peel or not to peel the ınternal lımıtıng membrane ın ıdıopathıc epıretınal membranes. Retina 1:S5–S11CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haritoglou C, Ehrt O, Gass CA et al (2001) Paracentral scotomata: a new finding after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Br J Ophthalmol 85:231–233CrossRef Haritoglou C, Ehrt O, Gass CA et al (2001) Paracentral scotomata: a new finding after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Br J Ophthalmol 85:231–233CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Karacorlu M, Karacorlu S, Ozdemir H (2003) Iatrogenic punctate chorioretinopathy after internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 135:178–182CrossRef Karacorlu M, Karacorlu S, Ozdemir H (2003) Iatrogenic punctate chorioretinopathy after internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 135:178–182CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Steven P, Laqua H, Wong D, Hoerauf H (2006) Secondary paracentral retinal holes following internal limiting membrane removal. Br J Ophthalmol 90:293–295CrossRef Steven P, Laqua H, Wong D, Hoerauf H (2006) Secondary paracentral retinal holes following internal limiting membrane removal. Br J Ophthalmol 90:293–295CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wolf S, Schnurbusch U, Wiedemann P et al (2004) Peeling of the basal membrane in the human retina: ultrastructural effects. Ophthalmology 111:238–243CrossRef Wolf S, Schnurbusch U, Wiedemann P et al (2004) Peeling of the basal membrane in the human retina: ultrastructural effects. Ophthalmology 111:238–243CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Da Mata AP, Burk SE, Riemann CD et al (2001) Indocyanine green assisted peeling of the retinal internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy surgery for macular hole repair. Ophthalmology 108:1187–1192CrossRef Da Mata AP, Burk SE, Riemann CD et al (2001) Indocyanine green assisted peeling of the retinal internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy surgery for macular hole repair. Ophthalmology 108:1187–1192CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Uemoto R, Yamamoto S, Takeuchi S (2004) Epimacular proliferative response following internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:177–180CrossRef Uemoto R, Yamamoto S, Takeuchi S (2004) Epimacular proliferative response following internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:177–180CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mason JO, Feist RM, Albert MA (2007) Jr. Eccentric macular holes after vitrectomy with peeling of epimacular proliferation. Retina 27:45–48CrossRef Mason JO, Feist RM, Albert MA (2007) Jr. Eccentric macular holes after vitrectomy with peeling of epimacular proliferation. Retina 27:45–48CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Basli E et al (2012) Paracentral retinal holes occurring after macular surgery: incidence, clinical features, and evolution. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250:1137–1142CrossRef Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Basli E et al (2012) Paracentral retinal holes occurring after macular surgery: incidence, clinical features, and evolution. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250:1137–1142CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rush RB, Simunovic MP, Aragon AV 2nd, Ysasaga JE (2014) Postoperative macular hole formation after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for the treatment of epiretinal membrane. Retina 34:890–896CrossRef Rush RB, Simunovic MP, Aragon AV 2nd, Ysasaga JE (2014) Postoperative macular hole formation after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for the treatment of epiretinal membrane. Retina 34:890–896CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Postoperative eccentric macular holes after surgery for vitreomacular interface diseases
Authors
Esat Yetkin
Mehmet Citirik
Mehmet Yasin Teke
Hasan Kiziltoprak
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01217-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

International Ophthalmology 3/2020 Go to the issue