Epimacular proliferative response following internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes

To present two patients who underwent surgery for an idiopathic macular hole (IMH) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and developed an epimacular proliferative response.

Observational case report. Two patients with an IMH underwent pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling. Ophthalmic examination including optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed pre- and postoperatively. In both cases, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) was performed postoperatively.

In the first case, the closure of the macular hole (MH) was confirmed ophthalmoscopically and by OCT following the surgery. At 2 months postoperatively, a thin epiretinal membrane (ERM) developed over the nasal macula area where the ILM had been peeled. The patient’s visual acuity had recovered to 1.0 but she complained of metamorphopsia. At 18 months postoperatively, the thin ERM around the nasal fovea remained and her visual acuity was still 1.0. In the second case, the MH was sealed after the surgery, and the patient’s visual acuity had improved to 1.0 at 3 months, but an indistinct ERM developed in the macular region where the ILM had been peeled. Two years after the operation, her VA was still 1.0. One and two years postoperatively, a thin epimacular proliferation remained unchanged; in addition, the OCT and SLO images remained stable.

Two patients who underwent IMH surgery with ILM peeling developed an epimacular proliferative response postoperatively. We suggest that the injury associated with the ILM peeling may have stimulated glial proliferation.