Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Original Paper

The use of in vivo confocal microscopy to track treatment success in fungal keratitis and to differentiate between Fusarium and Aspergillus keratitis

Authors: Seyed Ali Tabatabaei, Mohammad Soleimani, Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei, Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad, Niloufar Valipour, Shahram Mahmoudi

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the usefulness of serial in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) examinations to measure hyphal density for monitoring the treatment success among patients with fungal keratitis, and to compare the hyphal diameter as well as branching angle as a way of differentiation between Aspergillus and Fusarium species observed in IVCM.

Study design

Prospective nonrandomized study.

Patients and methods

The study was conducted from February 2015 to September 2016. Hyphal diameter, density and branching angle measurements were performed using IVCM at admission and on a weekly basis for at least 2 weeks after the start of treatment.

Results

During the period of study, 65 patients with culture-confirmed fungal keratitis were recruited. Of them, 40 were culture-positive for Fusarium spp. and 25 patients for Aspergillus spp. Before the start of treatment, the mean branching angle did not differ between the two species and the mean hyphal diameter was statistically higher for Aspergillus spp. (p = 0.029). Two weeks after the start of treatment, the mean hyphal diameter was statistically lower (p < 0.001) in the treatment failure group. Also the hyphal density significantly decreased with successful treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Decreasing hyphal density in serial IVCMs might be used as an indicator to predict the successful response of fungal ulcers to treatment. Branching angle is not different between Aspergillus and Fusarium keratitis. The mean hyphal diameter is significantly lower in the treatment failure group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takezawa Y, Shiraishi A, Noda E et al (2010) Effectiveness of in vivo confocal microscopy in detecting filamentous fungi during clinical course of fungal keratitis. Cornea 29(12):1346–1352CrossRef Takezawa Y, Shiraishi A, Noda E et al (2010) Effectiveness of in vivo confocal microscopy in detecting filamentous fungi during clinical course of fungal keratitis. Cornea 29(12):1346–1352CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chidambaram JD, Prajna NV, Larke N, Macleod D, Srikanthi P, Lanjewar S (2017) In vivo confocal microscopy appearance of Fusarium and Aspergillus species in fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 101(8):1119–1123CrossRef Chidambaram JD, Prajna NV, Larke N, Macleod D, Srikanthi P, Lanjewar S (2017) In vivo confocal microscopy appearance of Fusarium and Aspergillus species in fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 101(8):1119–1123CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Iyer SA, Tuli SS, Wagoner RC (2006) Fungal keratitis: emerging trends and treatment outcomes. Eye Contact Lens 32:267–271CrossRef Iyer SA, Tuli SS, Wagoner RC (2006) Fungal keratitis: emerging trends and treatment outcomes. Eye Contact Lens 32:267–271CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shukla PK, Kumar M, Keshava GB (2008) Mycotic keratitis: an overview of diagnosis and therapy. Mycoses 51(3):183–199CrossRef Shukla PK, Kumar M, Keshava GB (2008) Mycotic keratitis: an overview of diagnosis and therapy. Mycoses 51(3):183–199CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sun CQ, Lalitha P, Prajna NV et al (2014) Association between in vitro susceptibility to natamycin and voriconazole and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology 121(8):1495–1500CrossRef Sun CQ, Lalitha P, Prajna NV et al (2014) Association between in vitro susceptibility to natamycin and voriconazole and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology 121(8):1495–1500CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Winchester K, Mathers WD, Sutphin JE (1997) Diagnosis of Aspergillus keratitis in vivo with confocal microscopy. Cornea 16(1):27–31CrossRef Winchester K, Mathers WD, Sutphin JE (1997) Diagnosis of Aspergillus keratitis in vivo with confocal microscopy. Cornea 16(1):27–31CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Avunduk AM, Beuerman RW, Varnell ED, Kaufman HE (2003) Confocal microscopy of Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 87(4):409–410CrossRef Avunduk AM, Beuerman RW, Varnell ED, Kaufman HE (2003) Confocal microscopy of Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 87(4):409–410CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brasnu E, Bourcier T, Dupas B et al (2007) In vivo confocal microscopy in fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 91(5):588–591CrossRef Brasnu E, Bourcier T, Dupas B et al (2007) In vivo confocal microscopy in fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 91(5):588–591CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee S, Yun NR, Kim KH et al (2010) Discrepancy between histology and culture in filamentous fungal infections. Med Mycol 48(6):886–888CrossRef Lee S, Yun NR, Kim KH et al (2010) Discrepancy between histology and culture in filamentous fungal infections. Med Mycol 48(6):886–888CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schofield CM, Murray CK, Horvath EE et al (2007) Correlation of culture with histopathology in fungal burn wound colonization and infection. Burns 33(3):341–346CrossRef Schofield CM, Murray CK, Horvath EE et al (2007) Correlation of culture with histopathology in fungal burn wound colonization and infection. Burns 33(3):341–346CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thomas PA (2003) Current perspectives on ophthalmic mycoses. Clin Microbiol Rev 16(4):730–797CrossRef Thomas PA (2003) Current perspectives on ophthalmic mycoses. Clin Microbiol Rev 16(4):730–797CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zbiba W, Baba A, Bouayed E, Abdessalem N, Daldoul A (2016) A 5-year retrospective review of fungal keratitis in the region of Cap Bon. J Fr Ophtalmol 39(10):843–848CrossRef Zbiba W, Baba A, Bouayed E, Abdessalem N, Daldoul A (2016) A 5-year retrospective review of fungal keratitis in the region of Cap Bon. J Fr Ophtalmol 39(10):843–848CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rautaraya B, Sharma S, Kar S, Das S, Sahu SK (2011) Diagnosis and treatment outcome of mycotic keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in eastern India. BMC Ophthalmol 11:39CrossRef Rautaraya B, Sharma S, Kar S, Das S, Sahu SK (2011) Diagnosis and treatment outcome of mycotic keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in eastern India. BMC Ophthalmol 11:39CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Punia RS, Kundu R, Chander J, Arya SK, Handa U, Mohan H (2014) Spectrum of fungal keratitis: clinicopathologic study of 44 cases. Int J Ophthalmol 7(1):114–117PubMedPubMedCentral Punia RS, Kundu R, Chander J, Arya SK, Handa U, Mohan H (2014) Spectrum of fungal keratitis: clinicopathologic study of 44 cases. Int J Ophthalmol 7(1):114–117PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J et al (2012) Predictors of outcome in fungal keratitis. Eye 26(9):1226–1231CrossRef Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J et al (2012) Predictors of outcome in fungal keratitis. Eye 26(9):1226–1231CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ray KJ, Prajna NV, Lalitha P et al (2018) The significance of repeat cultures in the treatment of severe fungal keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 189:41–46CrossRef Ray KJ, Prajna NV, Lalitha P et al (2018) The significance of repeat cultures in the treatment of severe fungal keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 189:41–46CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The use of in vivo confocal microscopy to track treatment success in fungal keratitis and to differentiate between Fusarium and Aspergillus keratitis
Authors
Seyed Ali Tabatabaei
Mohammad Soleimani
Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei
Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad
Niloufar Valipour
Shahram Mahmoudi
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01209-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

International Ophthalmology 2/2020 Go to the issue