Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Cataract | Original Paper

Scanning electron microscopy study of different one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses after injection through microincisional cataract surgery cartridges

Authors: Paolo Cecchini, Rossella D’Aloisio, Chiara De Giacinto, Gianluca Turco, Daniele Tognetto

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate possible surface alterations of different models of one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) after folding and ejecting process through 2.2-mm microincisional cataract surgery (MICS) cartridges.

Methods

In this experimental laboratory study, the following IOLs were studied: Johnson&Johnson PCB00, HOYA iSert 251, Alcon AcrySof IQ SN60WF, Bausch&Lomb enVISTA MX-60. A total of 80 IOLs were analyzed. Twenty intraocular lenses of each type were studied: ten with a power of + 21 D ± 1 and ten with a power of + 28 D ± 1. IOLs were injected through a dedicated 2.2-mm MICS cartridge into a 50-mL vial containing 10 mL of deionized water. After rinsing and metallization process, scanning electron microscopy images were acquired.

Results

All IOLs presented high-quality construction biomaterials. Some IOLs showed superficial scratches and tears on the optic surface, mainly positioned according to the direction of the stress induced by the folding process. In other cases, small superficial tears were seen in a more peripheral position.

Conclusions

All lenses showed excellent surface quality. After folding and injection process some superficial scratches and tears of the IOL optic were detected in some models. Further studies are needed to assess the possible effects of those superficial damages on the optical quality of the IOLs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W (2011) Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision. Klin Oczna 113:314–320PubMed Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W (2011) Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision. Klin Oczna 113:314–320PubMed
2.
go back to reference Wang L, Xiao X, Zhao L, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhou A, Wang J, Wu Q (2017) Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 17:267CrossRef Wang L, Xiao X, Zhao L, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhou A, Wang J, Wu Q (2017) Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 17:267CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moon SC, Mohamed T, Fine IH (2007) Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after clear corneal incisions of different sizes. Korean J Ophthalmol 21:1–5CrossRef Moon SC, Mohamed T, Fine IH (2007) Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after clear corneal incisions of different sizes. Korean J Ophthalmol 21:1–5CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kohnen T, Lambert RJ, Koch DD (1997) Incision sizes for foldable intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 104:1277–1286CrossRef Kohnen T, Lambert RJ, Koch DD (1997) Incision sizes for foldable intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 104:1277–1286CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Koch PS (1991) Structural analysis of cataract incision construction. J Cataract Refract Surg 17:672–676CrossRef Koch PS (1991) Structural analysis of cataract incision construction. J Cataract Refract Surg 17:672–676CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H (2009) Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:233–239CrossRef Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H (2009) Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:233–239CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cleary G, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Boyce J, Marshall J (2009) Randomized intraindividual comparison of posterior capsule opacification between a microincision intraocular lens and a conventional intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:265–272CrossRef Cleary G, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Boyce J, Marshall J (2009) Randomized intraindividual comparison of posterior capsule opacification between a microincision intraocular lens and a conventional intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:265–272CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wylegala E, Rebkowska-Juraszek M, Dobrowolski D, Woyna-Orlewicz A (2009) Influence of 3.0 mm incision coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery (MICS) on corneal thickness. Klin Oczna 111:207–211PubMed Wylegala E, Rebkowska-Juraszek M, Dobrowolski D, Woyna-Orlewicz A (2009) Influence of 3.0 mm incision coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery (MICS) on corneal thickness. Klin Oczna 111:207–211PubMed
9.
go back to reference Strauss RW, Hochleitner ME, Gsenger W, Alge-Priglinger C, Faschinger CW, Henrich PB, Wedrich A, Priglinger SG, Schilcher K (2012) Changes in intraocular lens surface roughness during cataract surgery assessed by atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:146–154CrossRef Strauss RW, Hochleitner ME, Gsenger W, Alge-Priglinger C, Faschinger CW, Henrich PB, Wedrich A, Priglinger SG, Schilcher K (2012) Changes in intraocular lens surface roughness during cataract surgery assessed by atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:146–154CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rosen E (2012) Cataract surgery is refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:191–192CrossRef Rosen E (2012) Cataract surgery is refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:191–192CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berdeaux G, Meunier J, Arnould B, Viala-Danten M (2010) Measuring benefits and patients’ satisfaction when glasses are not needed after cataract and presbyopia surgery: scoring and psychometric validation of the Freedom from Glasses Value Scale (FGVS). BMC Ophthalmol 24:10–15 Berdeaux G, Meunier J, Arnould B, Viala-Danten M (2010) Measuring benefits and patients’ satisfaction when glasses are not needed after cataract and presbyopia surgery: scoring and psychometric validation of the Freedom from Glasses Value Scale (FGVS). BMC Ophthalmol 24:10–15
12.
go back to reference Kohen T, Klaproth OK (2010) Intraocular lenses for microincisional cataract surgery. Ophthalmologe 107:127–135CrossRef Kohen T, Klaproth OK (2010) Intraocular lenses for microincisional cataract surgery. Ophthalmologe 107:127–135CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Nocentini L, Danielli D, Menchini U (2006) Scanning electron microscopic analysis of acrylic intraocular lenses for microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:318–323CrossRef Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Nocentini L, Danielli D, Menchini U (2006) Scanning electron microscopic analysis of acrylic intraocular lenses for microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:318–323CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Faschinger CW (2001) Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:845–849CrossRef Faschinger CW (2001) Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:845–849CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Findl O, Buehl W, Bauer P, Sycha T (2010) Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:CD003738 Findl O, Buehl W, Bauer P, Sycha T (2010) Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:CD003738
16.
go back to reference Olson R, Cameron R, Hovis T, Hunkeler J, Lindstrom R, Steinert R (1997) Clinical evaluation of the unfolder. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:1384–1389CrossRef Olson R, Cameron R, Hovis T, Hunkeler J, Lindstrom R, Steinert R (1997) Clinical evaluation of the unfolder. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:1384–1389CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gohill J, Bhamra J (2003) Unfolder lens injection system with acrylic intraocular lenses: retrospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:980–982CrossRef Gohill J, Bhamra J (2003) Unfolder lens injection system with acrylic intraocular lenses: retrospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:980–982CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mamalis N (2001) Hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1339–1340CrossRef Mamalis N (2001) Hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1339–1340CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Scanning electron microscopy study of different one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses after injection through microincisional cataract surgery cartridges
Authors
Paolo Cecchini
Rossella D’Aloisio
Chiara De Giacinto
Gianluca Turco
Daniele Tognetto
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Keyword
Cataract
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01193-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

International Ophthalmology 2/2020 Go to the issue