Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 5/2018

Open Access 01-10-2018 | Original Paper

Clinical results after microincision biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of an Incise intraocular lens

Authors: Wojciech Lubiński, Marta Kirkiewicz, Karolina Podborączyńska-Jodko

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes after uncomplicated microincision biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of Incise intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

This study included 47 eyes of 29 patients (mean age 62.2 ± 8.6 years), who underwent 1.4-mm biaxial cataract surgery with implantation of the Incise IOL (Bausch and Lomb). At third month, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated. Three, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) LogMAR ETDRS, spherical equivalent refraction (SER), photopic distance corrected contrast sensitivity (CS) with and without glare (85 cd/m2) (CSV-1000) were assessed. One year after surgery, late complications were assessed and subjects were questioned for subjective symptoms.

Results

Mean of SIA was equal 0.29 ± 0.16 D. Three months postoperatively: mean UDVA improved from 0.83 to 0.04 (p < 0.001), CDVA from 0.58 to −0.05 (p < 0.001) and CNVA from 0.58 to −0.02 (p < 0.001) and all were stable during 1-year follow-up. Three months postoperatively, the mean SER was equal 0.07 ± 0.61 D and was within ±0.5 D in 79%, and within 1 D in 88% of eyes. During follow-up period, corrected CS with and without glare for distance was found to be within normal limits. The only late complication was posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Subjective quality of vision was very high; none of patients complained about glare.

Conclusions

Biaxial cataract surgery with implantation of the Incise IOL provided excellent clinical outcomes by minimizing SIA, stable refraction and low incidence of PCO.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alió JL, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Galal A (2004) Micro-incision cataract surgery. Highlights of Ophthalmology International, Miami Alió JL, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Galal A (2004) Micro-incision cataract surgery. Highlights of Ophthalmology International, Miami
2.
go back to reference Weikert MP (2006) Update on bimanual microincisional cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17:62–67PubMed Weikert MP (2006) Update on bimanual microincisional cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17:62–67PubMed
3.
go back to reference Pandey SK, Werner L, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Lal V, Patel N et al (2002) Phakonit. Cataract removal through a sub-1.0 mm incision and implantation of the ThinOptX rollable intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1710–1713CrossRefPubMed Pandey SK, Werner L, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Lal V, Patel N et al (2002) Phakonit. Cataract removal through a sub-1.0 mm incision and implantation of the ThinOptX rollable intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1710–1713CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liu YZ, Jiang YZ, Liu YH, Wu MX (2004) A preliminary report on bimanual microphacoemulsification. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 40:302–305PubMed Liu YZ, Jiang YZ, Liu YH, Wu MX (2004) A preliminary report on bimanual microphacoemulsification. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 40:302–305PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sonnleithner C, Bergholz R, Gonnermann J, Klamann MK, Torun N, Bertelmann E (2015) Clinical results and higher-order aberrations after 1.4 mm biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of a new aspheric intraocular lens. Ophthalmic Res 53:8–14CrossRef Sonnleithner C, Bergholz R, Gonnermann J, Klamann MK, Torun N, Bertelmann E (2015) Clinical results and higher-order aberrations after 1.4 mm biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of a new aspheric intraocular lens. Ophthalmic Res 53:8–14CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jiménez R, Valero A, Fernández J, Anera RG, Jiménez JR (2016) Optical quality and visual performance after cataract surgery with biaxial microincision intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1022–1028CrossRefPubMed Jiménez R, Valero A, Fernández J, Anera RG, Jiménez JR (2016) Optical quality and visual performance after cataract surgery with biaxial microincision intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1022–1028CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Toygar B, Yabas Kiziloglu O, Toygar O, Hacimustafaoglu AM (2016) Early clinical outcome with a new monofocal microincision intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol 36:657–664CrossRefPubMed Toygar B, Yabas Kiziloglu O, Toygar O, Hacimustafaoglu AM (2016) Early clinical outcome with a new monofocal microincision intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol 36:657–664CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Friend J, Khu PM, Singer DM, McCarthy D, del Carmen J, Rosner B (1993) Quantitating cataract and nuclear brunescence, the Harvard and LOCS systems. Optom Vis Sci 70:886–895CrossRefPubMed Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Friend J, Khu PM, Singer DM, McCarthy D, del Carmen J, Rosner B (1993) Quantitating cataract and nuclear brunescence, the Harvard and LOCS systems. Optom Vis Sci 70:886–895CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Koch DD (1998) Evaluating and reporting astigmatism for individual and aggregate data. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:57–65CrossRefPubMed Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Koch DD (1998) Evaluating and reporting astigmatism for individual and aggregate data. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:57–65CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Basak SK, Basak S, Chowdhury AR (2008) SIA-Soft: a new software to calculate surgically induced astigmatism in comparison with manual mathematics by vector method. Indian J Ophthalmol 56:170CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Basak SK, Basak S, Chowdhury AR (2008) SIA-Soft: a new software to calculate surgically induced astigmatism in comparison with manual mathematics by vector method. Indian J Ophthalmol 56:170CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pomeranie G, Evans D (1994) Test- retest reliability of the CSV-1000 contrast test and its relationship to glaucoma therapy. Incest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3357–3361 Pomeranie G, Evans D (1994) Test- retest reliability of the CSV-1000 contrast test and its relationship to glaucoma therapy. Incest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3357–3361
12.
go back to reference Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M (2005) Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology 112:1997–2003CrossRefPubMed Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M (2005) Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology 112:1997–2003CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dick HB (2012) Controlled clinical trial comparing biaxial microincision with coaxial small incision for cataract surgery. Eur J Ophtalmol 22:739–750CrossRef Dick HB (2012) Controlled clinical trial comparing biaxial microincision with coaxial small incision for cataract surgery. Eur J Ophtalmol 22:739–750CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yao K, Tang X, Ye P (2006) Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision. J Refract Surg 22:1079–1082 Yao K, Tang X, Ye P (2006) Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision. J Refract Surg 22:1079–1082
16.
go back to reference Alió JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D (2010) Corneal optical quality following sub 1.8 mm micro-incision cataract surgery versus 2.2 mm mini-incision coaxial phacoemulsification. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 17:94–99PubMedPubMedCentral Alió JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D (2010) Corneal optical quality following sub 1.8 mm micro-incision cataract surgery versus 2.2 mm mini-incision coaxial phacoemulsification. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 17:94–99PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Cavallini GM, Campi L, Torlai G, Forlini M, Fornasari E (2012) Clear corneal incisions in bimanual microincision cataract surgery: long-term wound-healing architecture. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1743–1748CrossRefPubMed Cavallini GM, Campi L, Torlai G, Forlini M, Fornasari E (2012) Clear corneal incisions in bimanual microincision cataract surgery: long-term wound-healing architecture. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1743–1748CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nanavaty MA, Spalton DJ, Gala KB, Dhital A, Boyce J (2013) Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification between 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:705–711CrossRefPubMed Nanavaty MA, Spalton DJ, Gala KB, Dhital A, Boyce J (2013) Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification between 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:705–711CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Alió JL, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Vianello A, Galal A (2005) Visual outcome of microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1549–1556CrossRefPubMed Alió JL, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Vianello A, Galal A (2005) Visual outcome of microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1549–1556CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Lubiński W (2012) Bimanual microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Akreos MI60 lens—1 year follow-up. Klin Oczna 114:245–248PubMed Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Lubiński W (2012) Bimanual microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Akreos MI60 lens—1 year follow-up. Klin Oczna 114:245–248PubMed
21.
go back to reference Lubiński W, Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Barnyk K, Karczewicz D (2007) Microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart 48S lens. Klin Oczna 109:267–271PubMed Lubiński W, Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Barnyk K, Karczewicz D (2007) Microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart 48S lens. Klin Oczna 109:267–271PubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical results after microincision biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of an Incise intraocular lens
Authors
Wojciech Lubiński
Marta Kirkiewicz
Karolina Podborączyńska-Jodko
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0686-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

International Ophthalmology 5/2018 Go to the issue