Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Paper

Monitoring the appositions of posterior graft–host junctions with anterior segment optical coherence tomogram after penetrating keratoplasty

Authors: Anuradha Raj, Renu Dhasmana, Harsh Bahadur, R. C. Nagpal

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed to monitor the graft–host junction’s (GHJ’s) apposition with anterior segment optical coherence tomogram after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and correlate the analysis with the preoperative diagnosis. Fifty-one eyes of 50 patients with various preoperative diagnosis of adherent leucoma, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, corneal opacity or scarring, graft failure, corneal dystrophy and anterior staphyloma, who underwent PK for optical purposes were reviewed retrospectively. Based on the age, the patients were divided into groups 1 and II: those aged ≤40 and >40 years, respectively. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was done for all these eyes to evaluate the posterior graft–host junction. All graft–host junction patterns were classified as well apposed, and malapposed with various components like hill, gap, step and tag. The comparisons of various clinical parameters were done for the various malapposed junction groups (hill, gap, step and tag). A total of 408 graft–host junction cross sections of 51 eyes were analysed. Amongst them 70 (17.15 %) sections were well apposed, and 338 (82.84 %) were malapposed. Most frequent type of malapposition was hill: 164 sections (40.19 %) followed by step: 139 sections (34.06 %). The distribution of graft–host junction alignment patterns varied amongst all the indications. Patients with preoperative diagnosis of adherent leucoma and corneal dystrophy had predominantly steps pattern in 65 (40.62 %) and 12 (75 %) sections, respectively. Hill pattern was seen predominantly in PBK, corneal opacity, graft failure and anterior staphyloma in 55 (42.96 %), 16 (40 %), 22 (45.83 %) and 8 (50 %) sections, respectively. Comparisons of various clinical characteristics like intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, best-corrected visual acuity, astigmatism and size of graft with the various malapposed patterns showed significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity and keratometric astigmatism in the hill pattern of malapposition group with p values of .004 and .053, respectively, using independent T test. Posterior graft–host junction analysis with anterior segment optical coherence tomography is very important for post penetrating keratoplasty management. The posterior wound profile differed according to the indications of penetrating keratoplasty. Best-corrected visual acuity and keratometric astigmatism showed significant difference with the malapposition hill (pattern).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frost NA, Wu J, Lai TF et al (2006) A review of randomized controlled trials of penetrating keratoplasty techniques. Ophthalmology 113:942–949CrossRefPubMed Frost NA, Wu J, Lai TF et al (2006) A review of randomized controlled trials of penetrating keratoplasty techniques. Ophthalmology 113:942–949CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Limberg MB, Dingeldein SA, Green MT et al (1989) Corneal compression sutures for the reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 108:36–42CrossRefPubMed Limberg MB, Dingeldein SA, Green MT et al (1989) Corneal compression sutures for the reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 108:36–42CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Morrison JC, Swan KC (1983) Descemet’s membrane in penetrating keratoplasties of the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 101:1927–1929CrossRefPubMed Morrison JC, Swan KC (1983) Descemet’s membrane in penetrating keratoplasties of the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 101:1927–1929CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sung MS, Yoon KC (2014) Evaluation of graft–host interface after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 58:282–289CrossRefPubMed Sung MS, Yoon KC (2014) Evaluation of graft–host interface after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 58:282–289CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Huang D, Li Y, Radhakrishnan S (2004) Optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment of the eye. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:1–6CrossRefPubMed Huang D, Li Y, Radhakrishnan S (2004) Optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment of the eye. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:1–6CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lim LS, Aung HT, Aung T et al (2008) Corneal imaging with anterior segment optical coherence tomography for lamellar keratoplasty procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 145:81–90CrossRefPubMed Lim LS, Aung HT, Aung T et al (2008) Corneal imaging with anterior segment optical coherence tomography for lamellar keratoplasty procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 145:81–90CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kaiserman I, Bahar I, Rootman DS (2008) Corneal wound malapposition after penetrating keratoplasty: an optical coherence tomography study. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1103–1107CrossRefPubMed Kaiserman I, Bahar I, Rootman DS (2008) Corneal wound malapposition after penetrating keratoplasty: an optical coherence tomography study. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1103–1107CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jhanji V, Jacqueline B, Vajpayee RB (2011) Evaluation of posterior wound profile after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cornea 30:277–280CrossRefPubMed Jhanji V, Jacqueline B, Vajpayee RB (2011) Evaluation of posterior wound profile after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cornea 30:277–280CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dandona L, Ragu K, Janarthanan M, Naduvilath TJ, Shenoy R, Rao GN (1997) Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 45:163–168PubMed Dandona L, Ragu K, Janarthanan M, Naduvilath TJ, Shenoy R, Rao GN (1997) Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 45:163–168PubMed
10.
go back to reference Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, Vajpayee RB (2005) Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India. Cornea 24:989–991CrossRefPubMed Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, Vajpayee RB (2005) Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India. Cornea 24:989–991CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lang GK, Green WR, Maumenee AE (1986) Clinicopathologic studies of keratoplasty eyes obtained post mortem. Am J Ophthalmol 101:28–40CrossRefPubMed Lang GK, Green WR, Maumenee AE (1986) Clinicopathologic studies of keratoplasty eyes obtained post mortem. Am J Ophthalmol 101:28–40CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yeneral NM, Kucumen RB, Gorgun E (2013) The complementary benefit of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in penetrating keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol 7:1515–1523CrossRef Yeneral NM, Kucumen RB, Gorgun E (2013) The complementary benefit of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in penetrating keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol 7:1515–1523CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Monitoring the appositions of posterior graft–host junctions with anterior segment optical coherence tomogram after penetrating keratoplasty
Authors
Anuradha Raj
Renu Dhasmana
Harsh Bahadur
R. C. Nagpal
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0269-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

International Ophthalmology 2/2017 Go to the issue