Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Paper

Evaluation of physical properties and dose equivalency of generic versus branded latanoprost formulations

Authors: Dewang Angmo, Meenakshi Wadhwani, Thirumurthy Velpandian, Ankita Kotnala, Ramanjit Sihota, Tanuj Dada

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the pharmaceutical characteristics of various marketed generic formulations of prostaglandin analogue latanoprost in the Indian market. Three generics of latanoprost and one branded (Xalatan) formulation (five vials each) were obtained from authorized agents from the respective commercial sourcing having the same batch number. These formulations were coded, and the labels were removed. At a standardized room temperature of 25 °C, the concentration, osmolarity, drop size, pH, and total drops per vial were determined for Xalatan and all the generics of latanoprost. The concentration of various brands varied between 50.49 ± 0.36 and 58.90 ± 0.52 µg/ml as compared to the standard labeled concentration of 50 µg/ml on the latanoprost vials. The concentration of drugs in individual drop varied from 1.30 ± 0.05 to 1.78 ± 0.04 µg/drop. The volume of drug formulation per bottle varied from 2.4 ± 0.12 to 2.6 ± 0.09 ml/bottle. The number of drops per bottle varied from minimum of 88.60 ± 0.10 drops to maximum of 102.0 ± 4.3 drops across all the formulations, while the drop size varied from 25.72 ± 2.70 to 29.97 ± 1.38 µl. The osmolarity of 2/4 drugs was within 300 mOs M (±10 %). The specific gravity varied between 0.98 ± 0.01 and 1.007 ± 0.01, while pH was between 7.05 ± 0.004 and 7.13 ± 0.005. Two of the generic brands were outside the United States pharmacopoeia limits (±10%) for ophthalmic formulation, with concentration exceeding the limits by 3 % (p = 0.151) and 8 % (p = 0.008), respectively. This pilot study highlights that there are significant variations in the drug concentrations and physical properties of generic latanoprost formulations. Although none of the brands had concentrations below the recommended level, two of the brands had concentrations exceeding the limits by 3 and 8 %, respectively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pascolini D, Mariotti SP (2012) Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96:614–618CrossRef Pascolini D, Mariotti SP (2012) Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96:614–618CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Quigley HA, Borman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 90:262–267CrossRef Quigley HA, Borman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 90:262–267CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Patel SS, Spencer CM (1996) Latanoprost. A review of its pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 9(5):363–378CrossRef Patel SS, Spencer CM (1996) Latanoprost. A review of its pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 9(5):363–378CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bae JP (1997) Drug patent expirations and the speed of generic entry. Health Serv 32:87–101 Bae JP (1997) Drug patent expirations and the speed of generic entry. Health Serv 32:87–101
6.
go back to reference Ascione FJ, Kirking DM, Gaither CA, Welage LS (2001) Historical overview of generic medication policy. J Am Pharm Assoc 41:567–577 Ascione FJ, Kirking DM, Gaither CA, Welage LS (2001) Historical overview of generic medication policy. J Am Pharm Assoc 41:567–577
7.
go back to reference Genazzani AA, Pattarino F (2008) Difficulties in the production of identical drug products from a pharmaceutical technology viewpoint. Drugs R D 9:65–72CrossRef Genazzani AA, Pattarino F (2008) Difficulties in the production of identical drug products from a pharmaceutical technology viewpoint. Drugs R D 9:65–72CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cantor LB (1997) Ophthalmic generic drug approval process: implications for efficacy and safety. J Glaucoma 6:344–349CrossRef Cantor LB (1997) Ophthalmic generic drug approval process: implications for efficacy and safety. J Glaucoma 6:344–349CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brechue WF, Maren TH (1993) pH and drug ionization affects ocular pressure lowering of topical anhydrase inhibitors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2581–2587PubMed Brechue WF, Maren TH (1993) pH and drug ionization affects ocular pressure lowering of topical anhydrase inhibitors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2581–2587PubMed
10.
go back to reference Paolera MD, Kasahara N, Umbelino CC, Walt JC (2008) Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: a patient-use study. BMC Ophthalmol 8:11CrossRef Paolera MD, Kasahara N, Umbelino CC, Walt JC (2008) Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: a patient-use study. BMC Ophthalmol 8:11CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johnson TV, Gupta PK, Vudathala DK, Blair IA, Tanna AP (2011) Thermal stability of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost under simulated daily use. J Ocul Phrmacol Ther 27:51–59CrossRef Johnson TV, Gupta PK, Vudathala DK, Blair IA, Tanna AP (2011) Thermal stability of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost under simulated daily use. J Ocul Phrmacol Ther 27:51–59CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Perry CM, McGavin JK, Culy CR, Ibbotson T (2003) Latanoprost: an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 20(8):597–630CrossRef Perry CM, McGavin JK, Culy CR, Ibbotson T (2003) Latanoprost: an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 20(8):597–630CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Alm A, Grierson I, Shields B (2008) Adverse events associated with prostaglandin analogue therapy. Surv Ophthalmol 53(Suppl 1):S93–S105CrossRef Alm A, Grierson I, Shields B (2008) Adverse events associated with prostaglandin analogue therapy. Surv Ophthalmol 53(Suppl 1):S93–S105CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Alm A, Schoenfelder J, McDermott J (2004) A 5-year, multicenter, open-label, safety study of adjunctive latanoprost therapy for glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122:957–965CrossRef Alm A, Schoenfelder J, McDermott J (2004) A 5-year, multicenter, open-label, safety study of adjunctive latanoprost therapy for glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122:957–965CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kahook MY, Fechtner RD, Katz LJ, Noecker RJ, Ammar DA (2012) A comparison of active ingredients and preservatives between brand name and generic topical glaucoma medications using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Curr Eye Res 37(2):101–108CrossRef Kahook MY, Fechtner RD, Katz LJ, Noecker RJ, Ammar DA (2012) A comparison of active ingredients and preservatives between brand name and generic topical glaucoma medications using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Curr Eye Res 37(2):101–108CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Duvall B, Kershner RM (2006). Pharmaceutical characteristics and delivery. In: Textbook of ophthalmic medications and pharmacology, SLACK Incorporated; 2nd edn, 1:2-3 Duvall B, Kershner RM (2006). Pharmaceutical characteristics and delivery. In: Textbook of ophthalmic medications and pharmacology, SLACK Incorporated; 2nd edn, 1:2-3
17.
go back to reference Narayanaswamy A, Neog A, Baskaran M, George R, Lingam V, Desai C et al (2007) A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan® in comparison with generic latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Indian J Ophthalmol 55:127–131CrossRef Narayanaswamy A, Neog A, Baskaran M, George R, Lingam V, Desai C et al (2007) A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan® in comparison with generic latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Indian J Ophthalmol 55:127–131CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fiscella RG, Jensen M, Van Dyck G (1998) Generic prednisolone suspension substitution. Arch Ophthalmol 116:703PubMed Fiscella RG, Jensen M, Van Dyck G (1998) Generic prednisolone suspension substitution. Arch Ophthalmol 116:703PubMed
19.
go back to reference Stringer W, Bryant R (2010) Dose uniformity of topical corticosteroid preparations; difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% versus branded and generic prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1%. Clin Ophthalmol 4:1119–1124CrossRef Stringer W, Bryant R (2010) Dose uniformity of topical corticosteroid preparations; difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% versus branded and generic prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1%. Clin Ophthalmol 4:1119–1124CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Velpandian T, Kotnala A, Halder N, Ravi AK, Vikneswari A, Sihota R (2014) Stability of latanoprost in generic formulations using controlled degradation and patient usage simulation studies. Curr Eye Res 11:1–11 Velpandian T, Kotnala A, Halder N, Ravi AK, Vikneswari A, Sihota R (2014) Stability of latanoprost in generic formulations using controlled degradation and patient usage simulation studies. Curr Eye Res 11:1–11
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of physical properties and dose equivalency of generic versus branded latanoprost formulations
Authors
Dewang Angmo
Meenakshi Wadhwani
Thirumurthy Velpandian
Ankita Kotnala
Ramanjit Sihota
Tanuj Dada
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0280-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

International Ophthalmology 2/2017 Go to the issue