Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 3/2017

01-07-2017 | Original Article

Supporting disclosure of genetic information to family members: professional practice and timelines in cancer genetics

Authors: Benjamin Derbez, Antoine de Pauw, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Sandrine de Montgolfier

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Disclosure of genetic information within families is one of the longstanding questions under scrutiny in the field of genetics. Most of the probands entrusted with family disclosure succeed in this task, but there are still many problematic cases where it proves difficult. How can professionals help probands disclose this information? What levers can they activate to foster the diffusion of genetic information within families? In the context of a new legal framework concerning this question in France, this paper offers a comprehensive view of the process of genetic counselling in a cancer genetics department. Based on an ethnographic study, it focuses on the interactions between professionals and probands during each step of the testing procedures in order to identify key times when the issue can be addressed. The results show that the question of family disclosure needs to be addressed before, during and after the test. Greater awareness of this continuum among professionals could help them foster family disclosure by supporting the probands at each stage of the testing procedure
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The consent forms given to index cases and relatives were different. For the latter, at the time of the investigation, the obligation to inform relatives was not stated in the document.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arribas-Ayllon M, Featherstone K, Atkinson P (2010) The practical ethics of genetic responsibility: non-disclosure and the autonomy of affect. Soc Theory Health 9(1):3–23. doi:10.1057/sth.2009.22 CrossRef Arribas-Ayllon M, Featherstone K, Atkinson P (2010) The practical ethics of genetic responsibility: non-disclosure and the autonomy of affect. Soc Theory Health 9(1):3–23. doi:10.​1057/​sth.​2009.​22 CrossRef
3.
5.
go back to reference Chivers Seymour K, Addington-Hall J, Lucassen AM, Foster CL (2010) What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. J Genet Couns 19(4):330–342. doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y CrossRefPubMed Chivers Seymour K, Addington-Hall J, Lucassen AM, Foster CL (2010) What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. J Genet Couns 19(4):330–342. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-010-9296-y CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference D’Audiffret Van Haecke D, de Montgolfier S (2016) Genetic test results and disclosure to family members: qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France. J Genet Couns 25(3):483–494. doi:10.1007/s10897-015-9896-7 CrossRefPubMed D’Audiffret Van Haecke D, de Montgolfier S (2016) Genetic test results and disclosure to family members: qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France. J Genet Couns 25(3):483–494. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-015-9896-7 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Shkedi-Rafid S, Crawford G, Lucassen A (2016) Health-care professionals’ responsibility to patients’ relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Genet Med 18:290–301. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.72 (with supplementary table S1 online)CrossRefPubMed Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Shkedi-Rafid S, Crawford G, Lucassen A (2016) Health-care professionals’ responsibility to patients’ relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Genet Med 18:290–301. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2015.​72 (with supplementary table S1 online)CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dugan RB, Wiesner GL, Juengst ET, O’Riordan M, Matthews AL, Robin NH (2003) Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors’ clinical experience. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 119C:27–34CrossRefPubMed Dugan RB, Wiesner GL, Juengst ET, O’Riordan M, Matthews AL, Robin NH (2003) Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors’ clinical experience. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 119C:27–34CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Eeles RA (2000) Future possibilities in the prevention of breast cancer: intervention strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 2(4):283–290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eeles RA (2000) Future possibilities in the prevention of breast cancer: intervention strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 2(4):283–290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Farnos C, Rial-Sebbag E (2013) The genetic information to relatives in 2012, to a patient empowerment for the benefit of his relatives. Presented at the Medical Law Topical Seminar, Les études hospitalières, Bordeaux Farnos C, Rial-Sebbag E (2013) The genetic information to relatives in 2012, to a patient empowerment for the benefit of his relatives. Presented at the Medical Law Topical Seminar, Les études hospitalières, Bordeaux
12.
go back to reference Forrest LE, Delatycki MB, Curnow L, Skene L, Aitken M (2010) Genetic health professionals and the communication of genetic information in families: practice during and after a genetic consultation. Am J Med Genet A 152 A(6):1458–1466. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33385 Forrest LE, Delatycki MB, Curnow L, Skene L, Aitken M (2010) Genetic health professionals and the communication of genetic information in families: practice during and after a genetic consultation. Am J Med Genet A 152 A(6):1458–1466. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​33385
13.
go back to reference Gaff CL, Clarke AJ, Atkinson P, Sivell S, Elwyn G, Iredale R, Edwards A et al (2007) Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Human Genet 15(10):999–1011. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201883 CrossRef Gaff CL, Clarke AJ, Atkinson P, Sivell S, Elwyn G, Iredale R, Edwards A et al (2007) Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Human Genet 15(10):999–1011. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​ejhg.​5201883 CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York
17.
go back to reference Kardashian A, Fehniger J, Creasman J, Cheung E, Beattie MS (2012) A Pilot study of the sharing risk information tool (ShaRIT) for families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 10(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/1897-4287-10-4 CrossRef Kardashian A, Fehniger J, Creasman J, Cheung E, Beattie MS (2012) A Pilot study of the sharing risk information tool (ShaRIT) for families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 10(1):1–10. doi:10.​1186/​1897-4287-10-4 CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Latour B, Biezunski M (2005) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. La Découverte, Paris Latour B, Biezunski M (2005) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. La Découverte, Paris
21.
go back to reference Law No. 2011–814 dated 7 July 2011 (art. 2) (2011) Code de la santé publique. L1131-1, JORF Law No. 2011–814 dated 7 July 2011 (art. 2) (2011) Code de la santé publique. L1131-1, JORF
23.
go back to reference Mendes Á, Paneque M, Sousa L, Clarke A, Sequeiros J (2016) How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence. Eur J Human Genet 24(3):315–325. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.174 CrossRef Mendes Á, Paneque M, Sousa L, Clarke A, Sequeiros J (2016) How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence. Eur J Human Genet 24(3):315–325. doi:10.​1038/​ejhg.​2015.​174 CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pujol P, Lyonnet DS, Frebourg T, Blin J, Picot MC, Lasset C, Nogues C et al (2013) Lack of referral for genetic counseling and testing in BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndromes: a nationwide study based on 240,134 consultations and 134,652 genetic tests. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(1):135–144. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2669-9 CrossRefPubMed Pujol P, Lyonnet DS, Frebourg T, Blin J, Picot MC, Lasset C, Nogues C et al (2013) Lack of referral for genetic counseling and testing in BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndromes: a nationwide study based on 240,134 consultations and 134,652 genetic tests. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(1):135–144. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-013-2669-9 CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC (2000) Benefit of prophylactic mastectomy for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. JAMA 283(23):3070–3072CrossRefPubMed Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC (2000) Benefit of prophylactic mastectomy for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. JAMA 283(23):3070–3072CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Stol YH, Menko FH, Westerman MJ, Janssens RM (2010) Informing family members about a hereditary predisposition to cancer: attitudes and practices among clinical geneticists. J Med Ethics 36:391–395CrossRefPubMed Stol YH, Menko FH, Westerman MJ, Janssens RM (2010) Informing family members about a hereditary predisposition to cancer: attitudes and practices among clinical geneticists. J Med Ethics 36:391–395CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Suthers GK, Armstrong J, McCormack J, Trott D (2006) Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. J Med Genet 43(8):665–670 Suthers GK, Armstrong J, McCormack J, Trott D (2006) Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. J Med Genet 43(8):665–670
30.
go back to reference Weil J (2003) Psychosocial genetic counselling in the post non-directive area: a point of view. J Genet Couns 12:199–211CrossRefPubMed Weil J (2003) Psychosocial genetic counselling in the post non-directive area: a point of view. J Genet Couns 12:199–211CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wilson BJ, Forrest K, van Teijlingen ER, McKee L, Haites N, Matthews E, Simpson SA (2004) Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Commun Genet 7(1):15–24. doi:10.1159/000080300 Wilson BJ, Forrest K, van Teijlingen ER, McKee L, Haites N, Matthews E, Simpson SA (2004) Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Commun Genet 7(1):15–24. doi:10.​1159/​000080300
Metadata
Title
Supporting disclosure of genetic information to family members: professional practice and timelines in cancer genetics
Authors
Benjamin Derbez
Antoine de Pauw
Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Sandrine de Montgolfier
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-9970-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Familial Cancer 3/2017 Go to the issue

Original Article

Gastric tumours in FAP

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine