Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 2/2017

Open Access 01-04-2017 | Original Article

Uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing for retinoblastoma compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands

Authors: Charlotte J. Dommering, Lidewij Henneman, Annemarie H. van der Hout, Marianne A. Jonker, Carli M. J. Tops, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Rob B. van der Luijt, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Egbert J. W. Redeker, Christine E. M. de Die-Smulders, Annette C. Moll, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Since the 1980s the genetic cause of many hereditary tumor syndromes has been elucidated. As a consequence, carriers of a deleterious mutation in these genes may opt for prenatal diagnoses (PND). We studied the uptake of prenatal diagnosis for five hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands. Uptake for retinoblastoma (Rb) was compared with uptake for Von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHL), Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC). A questionnaire was completed by all nine DNA-diagnostic laboratories assessing the number of independent mutation-positive families identified from the start of diagnostic testing until May 2013, and the number of PNDs performed for these syndromes within these families. Of 187 families with a known Rb-gene mutation, 22 had performed PND (11.8%), this was significantly higher than uptake for FAP (1.6%) and HBOC (<0.2%). For VHL (6.5%) and LFS (4.9%) the difference was not statistically significant. PND for Rb started 3 years after introduction of diagnostic DNA testing and remained stable over the years. For the other cancer syndromes PND started 10–15 years after the introduction and uptake for PND showed an increase after 2009. We conclude that uptake of PND for Rb was significantly higher than for FAP and HBOC, but not different from VHL and LFS. Early onset, high penetrance, lack of preventive surgery and perceived burden of disease may explain these differences.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Offit K, Kohut K, Clagett B et al (2006) Cancer genetic testing and assisted reproduction. J Clin Oncol 24:4775–4782CrossRefPubMed Offit K, Kohut K, Clagett B et al (2006) Cancer genetic testing and assisted reproduction. J Clin Oncol 24:4775–4782CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Dommering CJ, van den Heuvel MR, Moll AC et al (2010) Reproductive decision-making: a qualitative study among couples at increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma. Clin Genet 78:334–341CrossRefPubMed Dommering CJ, van den Heuvel MR, Moll AC et al (2010) Reproductive decision-making: a qualitative study among couples at increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma. Clin Genet 78:334–341CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dommering CJ, Garvelink MM, Moll AC et al (2012) Reproductive behavior of individuals with increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma. Clin Genet 81:216–223CrossRefPubMed Dommering CJ, Garvelink MM, Moll AC et al (2012) Reproductive behavior of individuals with increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma. Clin Genet 81:216–223CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rich TA, Liu M, Etzel CJ et al (2014) Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Fam Cancer 13:291–299CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rich TA, Liu M, Etzel CJ et al (2014) Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Fam Cancer 13:291–299CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Mitchell C, Nicolaides K, Kingston J et al (1988) Prenatal exclusion of hereditary retinoblastoma. Lancet 1:826CrossRefPubMed Mitchell C, Nicolaides K, Kingston J et al (1988) Prenatal exclusion of hereditary retinoblastoma. Lancet 1:826CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ao A, Wells D, Handyside AH et al (1998) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited cancer: familial adenomatous polyposis coli. J Assist Reprod Genet 15:140–144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ao A, Wells D, Handyside AH et al (1998) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited cancer: familial adenomatous polyposis coli. J Assist Reprod Genet 15:140–144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Harper JC, Geraedts J, Borry P et al (2013) Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Eur J Hum Genet 21(Suppl 2):S1–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harper JC, Geraedts J, Borry P et al (2013) Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Eur J Hum Genet 21(Suppl 2):S1–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Bower B et al (2009) Decisions and ethical issues among BRCA carriers and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Minerva Med 100:371–383PubMed Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Bower B et al (2009) Decisions and ethical issues among BRCA carriers and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Minerva Med 100:371–383PubMed
11.
go back to reference Wang CW, Hui EC (2009) Ethical, legal and social implications of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Reprod Biomed Online 19(Suppl 2):23–33CrossRefPubMed Wang CW, Hui EC (2009) Ethical, legal and social implications of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Reprod Biomed Online 19(Suppl 2):23–33CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Niermeijer MF, de Wert G, Dondorp W (2006) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer. Lancet Oncol 7:794–795CrossRefPubMed Niermeijer MF, de Wert G, Dondorp W (2006) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer. Lancet Oncol 7:794–795CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Niermeijer MF, de Die-Smulders CE, Page-Christiaens GC, de Wert GM (2008) Genetic cancer syndromes and reproductive choice: dialogue between parents and politicians on preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152:1503–1506PubMed Niermeijer MF, de Die-Smulders CE, Page-Christiaens GC, de Wert GM (2008) Genetic cancer syndromes and reproductive choice: dialogue between parents and politicians on preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152:1503–1506PubMed
14.
go back to reference Clancy T (2010) A clinical perspective on ethical arguments around prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for later onset inherited cancer predispositions. Fam Cancer 9:9–14CrossRefPubMed Clancy T (2010) A clinical perspective on ethical arguments around prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for later onset inherited cancer predispositions. Fam Cancer 9:9–14CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Leading edge (2006) Ethics of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer. Lancet Oncol 7:611CrossRef Leading edge (2006) Ethics of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer. Lancet Oncol 7:611CrossRef
16.
go back to reference van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Lodder LN et al (2003) Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 21:3867–3874CrossRefPubMed van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Lodder LN et al (2003) Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 21:3867–3874CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013) Use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for serious adult onset conditions: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 100:54–57CrossRef Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013) Use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for serious adult onset conditions: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 100:54–57CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cobben JM, Brocker-Vriends AH, Leschot NJ (2002) Prenatal diagnosis for hereditary predisposition to mammary and ovarian carcinoma—defining a position. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 146:1461–1465PubMed Cobben JM, Brocker-Vriends AH, Leschot NJ (2002) Prenatal diagnosis for hereditary predisposition to mammary and ovarian carcinoma—defining a position. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 146:1461–1465PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lodder LN, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW et al (2000) Attitudes towards termination of pregnancy in subjects who underwent presymptomatic testing for the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation in The Netherlands. J Med Genet 37:883–884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lodder LN, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW et al (2000) Attitudes towards termination of pregnancy in subjects who underwent presymptomatic testing for the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation in The Netherlands. J Med Genet 37:883–884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Friend SH, Bernards R, Rogelj S et al (1986) A human DNA segment with properties of the gene that predisposes to retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma. Nature 323:643–646CrossRefPubMed Friend SH, Bernards R, Rogelj S et al (1986) A human DNA segment with properties of the gene that predisposes to retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma. Nature 323:643–646CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Latif F, Tory K, Gnarra J et al (1993) Identification of the von Hippel–Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science 260:1317–1320CrossRefPubMed Latif F, Tory K, Gnarra J et al (1993) Identification of the von Hippel–Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science 260:1317–1320CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC et al (1990) Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science 250:1233–1238CrossRefPubMed Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC et al (1990) Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science 250:1233–1238CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK et al (1991) Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science 253:661–665CrossRefPubMed Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK et al (1991) Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science 253:661–665CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D et al (1994) A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 266:66–71CrossRefPubMed Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D et al (1994) A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 266:66–71CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J et al (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792CrossRefPubMed Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J et al (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Brandt AC, Tschirgi ML, Ready KJ et al (2010) Knowledge, attitudes, and clinical experience of physicians regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. Fam Cancer 9:479–487CrossRefPubMed Brandt AC, Tschirgi ML, Ready KJ et al (2010) Knowledge, attitudes, and clinical experience of physicians regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. Fam Cancer 9:479–487CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Julian-Reynier C, Chabal F, Frebourg T et al (2009) Professionals assess the acceptability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis for managing inherited predisposition to cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:4475–4480CrossRefPubMed Julian-Reynier C, Chabal F, Frebourg T et al (2009) Professionals assess the acceptability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis for managing inherited predisposition to cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:4475–4480CrossRefPubMed
33.
Metadata
Title
Uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing for retinoblastoma compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands
Authors
Charlotte J. Dommering
Lidewij Henneman
Annemarie H. van der Hout
Marianne A. Jonker
Carli M. J. Tops
Ans M. W. van den Ouweland
Rob B. van der Luijt
Arjen R. Mensenkamp
Frans B. L. Hogervorst
Egbert J. W. Redeker
Christine E. M. de Die-Smulders
Annette C. Moll
Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-016-9943-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Familial Cancer 2/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine