Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Stroke | AGEING

Quantification of biological age as a determinant of age-related diseases in the Rotterdam Study: a structural equation modeling approach

Authors: Reem Waziry, Luuk Gras, Sanaz Sedaghat, Henning Tiemeier, Gerrit J. Weverling, Mohsen Ghanbari, Jaco Klap, Frank de Wolf, Albert Hofman, M. Arfan Ikram, Jaap Goudsmit

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Chronological age alone is not a sufficient measure of the true physiological state of the body. The aims of the present study were to: (1) quantify biological age based on a physiological biomarker composite model; (2) and evaluate its association with death and age-related disease onset in the setting of an elderly population. Using structural equation modeling we computed biological age for 1699 individuals recruited from the first and second waves of the Rotterdam study. The algorithm included nine physiological parameters (c-reactive protein, creatinine, albumin, total cholesterol, cytomegalovirus optical density, urea nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, forced expiratory volume and systolic blood pressure). We assessed the association between biological age, all-cause mortality, all-cause morbidity and specific age-related diseases over a median follow-up of 11 years. Biological age, compared to chronological age or the traditional biomarkers of age-related diseases, showed a stronger association with all-cause mortality (HR 1.15 vs. 1.13 and 1.10), all-cause morbidity (HR 1.06 vs. 1.05 and 1.03), stroke (HR 1.17 vs. 1.08 and 1.04), cancer (HR 1.07 vs. 1.04 and 1.02) and diabetes mellitus (HR 1.12 vs. 1.01 and 0.98). Individuals who were biologically younger exhibited a healthier life-style as reflected in their lower BMI (P < 0.001) and lower incidence of stroke (P < 0.001), cancer (P < 0.01) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.02). Collectively, our findings suggest that biological age based on the biomarker composite model of nine physiological parameters is a useful construct to assess individuals 65 years and older at increased risk for specific age-related diseases.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Comfort A. Test-battery to measure ageing-rate in man. Lancet. 1969;294(7635):1411–5.CrossRef Comfort A. Test-battery to measure ageing-rate in man. Lancet. 1969;294(7635):1411–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klemera P, Doubal S. A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;127(3):240–8.CrossRefPubMed Klemera P, Doubal S. A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;127(3):240–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Levine ME. Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age? J Gerontol Ser A: Biomed Sci Med Sci. 2012;68(6):667–74.CrossRef Levine ME. Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age? J Gerontol Ser A: Biomed Sci Med Sci. 2012;68(6):667–74.CrossRef
8.
10.
go back to reference Levine ME. Response to Dr. Mitnitski’s and Dr. Rockwood’s letter to the editor: biological age revisited. J Gerontol Ser A: Biomed Sci Med Sci. 2013;69(3):297–8.CrossRef Levine ME. Response to Dr. Mitnitski’s and Dr. Rockwood’s letter to the editor: biological age revisited. J Gerontol Ser A: Biomed Sci Med Sci. 2013;69(3):297–8.CrossRef
12.
13.
14.
go back to reference Hollingsworth JW, Hashizume A, Jablon S. Correlations between tests of aging in Hiroshima subjects—an attempt to define “physiologic age”. Yale J Biol Med. 1965;38(1):11–26.PubMedPubMedCentral Hollingsworth JW, Hashizume A, Jablon S. Correlations between tests of aging in Hiroshima subjects—an attempt to define “physiologic age”. Yale J Biol Med. 1965;38(1):11–26.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Takeda H, Inada H, Inoue M, Yoshikawa H, Abe H. Evaluation of biological age and physical age by multiple regression analysis. Med Inform = Medecine et informatique. 1982;7(3):221–7.CrossRefPubMed Takeda H, Inada H, Inoue M, Yoshikawa H, Abe H. Evaluation of biological age and physical age by multiple regression analysis. Med Inform = Medecine et informatique. 1982;7(3):221–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kroll J, Saxtrup O. On the use of regression analysis for the estimation of human biological age. Biogerontology. 2000;1(4):363–8.CrossRefPubMed Kroll J, Saxtrup O. On the use of regression analysis for the estimation of human biological age. Biogerontology. 2000;1(4):363–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hofecker G, Skalicky M, Kment A, Niedermuller H. Models of the biological age of the rat. I. A factor model of age parameters. Mech Ageing Dev. 1980;14(3–4):345–59.CrossRefPubMed Hofecker G, Skalicky M, Kment A, Niedermuller H. Models of the biological age of the rat. I. A factor model of age parameters. Mech Ageing Dev. 1980;14(3–4):345–59.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Skalicky M, Hofecker G, Kment A, Niedermuller H. Models of the biological age of the rat. II. Multiple regression models in the study on influencing aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 1980;14(3–4):361–77.CrossRefPubMed Skalicky M, Hofecker G, Kment A, Niedermuller H. Models of the biological age of the rat. II. Multiple regression models in the study on influencing aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 1980;14(3–4):361–77.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nakamura E, Miyao K, Ozeki T. Assessment of biological age by principal component analysis. Mech Ageing Dev. 1988;46(1–3):1–18.CrossRefPubMed Nakamura E, Miyao K, Ozeki T. Assessment of biological age by principal component analysis. Mech Ageing Dev. 1988;46(1–3):1–18.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nakamura E, Miyao K. A method for identifying biomarkers of aging and constructing an index of biological age in humans. J Gerontol Ser A, Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(10):1096–105.CrossRef Nakamura E, Miyao K. A method for identifying biomarkers of aging and constructing an index of biological age in humans. J Gerontol Ser A, Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(10):1096–105.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Barker DJ, Eriksson JG, Forsen T, Osmond C. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(6):1235–9.CrossRefPubMed Barker DJ, Eriksson JG, Forsen T, Osmond C. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(6):1235–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Belsky DW, Moffitt TE, Cohen AA, et al. Eleven telomere, epigenetic clock, and biomarker-composite quantifications of biological aging: do they measure the same thing? Am J Epidemiol. 2017;187(6):1220–30.PubMedCentral Belsky DW, Moffitt TE, Cohen AA, et al. Eleven telomere, epigenetic clock, and biomarker-composite quantifications of biological aging: do they measure the same thing? Am J Epidemiol. 2017;187(6):1220–30.PubMedCentral
32.
Metadata
Title
Quantification of biological age as a determinant of age-related diseases in the Rotterdam Study: a structural equation modeling approach
Authors
Reem Waziry
Luuk Gras
Sanaz Sedaghat
Henning Tiemeier
Gerrit J. Weverling
Mohsen Ghanbari
Jaco Klap
Frank de Wolf
Albert Hofman
M. Arfan Ikram
Jaap Goudsmit
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00497-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

European Journal of Epidemiology 8/2019 Go to the issue