Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 4/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY

Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium

Authors: Katie M. Williams, Virginie J. M. Verhoeven, Phillippa Cumberland, Geir Bertelsen, Christian Wolfram, Gabriëlle H. S. Buitendijk, Albert Hofman, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Johannes R. Vingerling, Robert W. A. M. Kuijpers, René Höhn, Alireza Mirshahi, Anthony P. Khawaja, Robert N. Luben, Maja Gran Erke, Therese von Hanno, Omar Mahroo, Ruth Hogg, Christian Gieger, Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire, Eleftherios Anastasopoulos, Alain Bron, Jean-François Dartigues, Jean-François Korobelnik, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Fotis Topouzis, Cécile Delcourt, Jugnoo Rahi, Thomas Meitinger, Astrid Fletcher, Paul J. Foster, Norbert Pfeiffer, Caroline C. W. Klaver, Christopher J. Hammond

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

To estimate the prevalence of refractive error in adults across Europe. Refractive data (mean spherical equivalent) collected between 1990 and 2013 from fifteen population-based cohort and cross-sectional studies of the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium were combined in a random effects meta-analysis stratified by 5-year age intervals and gender. Participants were excluded if they were identified as having had cataract surgery, retinal detachment, refractive surgery or other factors that might influence refraction. Estimates of refractive error prevalence were obtained including the following classifications: myopia ≤−0.75 diopters (D), high myopia ≤−6D, hyperopia ≥1D and astigmatism ≥1D. Meta-analysis of refractive error was performed for 61,946 individuals from fifteen studies with median age ranging from 44 to 81 and minimal ethnic variation (98 % European ancestry). The age-standardised prevalences (using the 2010 European Standard Population, limited to those ≥25 and <90 years old) were: myopia 30.6 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 30.4–30.9], high myopia 2.7 % (95 % CI 2.69–2.73), hyperopia 25.2 % (95 % CI 25.0–25.4) and astigmatism 23.9 % (95 % CI 23.7–24.1). Age-specific estimates revealed a high prevalence of myopia in younger participants [47.2 % (CI 41.8–52.5) in 25–29 years-olds]. Refractive error affects just over a half of European adults. The greatest burden of refractive error is due to myopia, with high prevalence rates in young adults. Using the 2010 European population estimates, we estimate there are 227.2 million people with myopia across Europe.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference Smith TS, Frick KD, Holden BA, Fricke TR, Naidoo KS. Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(6):431–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Smith TS, Frick KD, Holden BA, Fricke TR, Naidoo KS. Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(6):431–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Group* TEDPR. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122: 495–505. Group* TEDPR. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122: 495–505.
9.
go back to reference Hofman A, Grobbee D, De Jong P, Van den Ouweland F. Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the rotterdam elderly study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991;7(4):403–22.CrossRefPubMed Hofman A, Grobbee D, De Jong P, Van den Ouweland F. Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the rotterdam elderly study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991;7(4):403–22.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sloan LL. Measurement of visual acuity; a critical review. A.M.A Arch Ophthalmol. 1951;45(6):704–25.CrossRef Sloan LL. Measurement of visual acuity; a critical review. A.M.A Arch Ophthalmol. 1951;45(6):704–25.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Eurostat EC. Revision of the European standard population: report of Eurostat’s task force. Eurostat methodologies and working papers. 2013. Eurostat EC. Revision of the European standard population: report of Eurostat’s task force. Eurostat methodologies and working papers. 2013.
15.
go back to reference Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRef Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goldblum D, Brugger A, Haselhoff A, Schmickler S. Longitudinal change of refraction over at least 5 years in 15,000 patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(5):1431–6.CrossRefPubMed Goldblum D, Brugger A, Haselhoff A, Schmickler S. Longitudinal change of refraction over at least 5 years in 15,000 patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(5):1431–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee KE, Klein BE, Klein R, Wong TY. Changes in refraction over 10 years in an adult population: the beaver dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(8):2566–71.PubMed Lee KE, Klein BE, Klein R, Wong TY. Changes in refraction over 10 years in an adult population: the beaver dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(8):2566–71.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FLI. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971–1972 and 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1632–9.CrossRefPubMed Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FLI. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971–1972 and 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1632–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wang Q, Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE. Refractive status in the beaver dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(13):4344–7.PubMed Wang Q, Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE. Refractive status in the beaver dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(13):4344–7.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Katz J, Tielsch JM, Sommer A. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(2):334–40.PubMed Katz J, Tielsch JM, Sommer A. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(2):334–40.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Wensor M, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(5):658–63.CrossRefPubMed Wensor M, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(5):658–63.CrossRefPubMed
25.
27.
go back to reference Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(9):2486–94.PubMed Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(9):2486–94.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lin LLK, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(1):27–33.PubMed Lin LLK, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(1):27–33.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Wang TJCT, Wang TH, Lin LL, Shih YF. Changes of the ocular refraction among freshmen in National Taiwan University between 1988 and 2005. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(5):1168–9.CrossRefPubMed Wang TJCT, Wang TH, Lin LL, Shih YF. Changes of the ocular refraction among freshmen in National Taiwan University between 1988 and 2005. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(5):1168–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kanthan GL, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Cumming RG, Wang JJ. Myopia and the long-term incidence of cataract and cataract surgery: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42(4):347–53. doi:10.1111/ceo.12206.CrossRef Kanthan GL, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Cumming RG, Wang JJ. Myopia and the long-term incidence of cataract and cataract surgery: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42(4):347–53. doi:10.​1111/​ceo.​12206.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference United Nations DoEaSAPd, population estimates and projections section. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. 2012. United Nations DoEaSAPd, population estimates and projections section. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. 2012.
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium
Authors
Katie M. Williams
Virginie J. M. Verhoeven
Phillippa Cumberland
Geir Bertelsen
Christian Wolfram
Gabriëlle H. S. Buitendijk
Albert Hofman
Cornelia M. van Duijn
Johannes R. Vingerling
Robert W. A. M. Kuijpers
René Höhn
Alireza Mirshahi
Anthony P. Khawaja
Robert N. Luben
Maja Gran Erke
Therese von Hanno
Omar Mahroo
Ruth Hogg
Christian Gieger
Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire
Eleftherios Anastasopoulos
Alain Bron
Jean-François Dartigues
Jean-François Korobelnik
Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
Fotis Topouzis
Cécile Delcourt
Jugnoo Rahi
Thomas Meitinger
Astrid Fletcher
Paul J. Foster
Norbert Pfeiffer
Caroline C. W. Klaver
Christopher J. Hammond
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

European Journal of Epidemiology 4/2015 Go to the issue