Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2012

Open Access 01-06-2012 | METHODS

The Natsal-SF: a validated measure of sexual function for use in community surveys

Authors: Kirstin R. Mitchell, George B. Ploubidis, Jessica Datta, Kaye Wellings

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Sexual dysfunction often features as an outcome variable in community health surveys and epidemiological surveys. Key design imperatives for measures included in large scale, population-based surveys are acceptability, brevity and relevance to diverse sexual lifestyles. None of the available measures of sexual dysfunction are entirely suited to this task. We developed a new measure of sexual function for the third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal 3). Items for the measure were derived from qualitative work from patients and community members. The draft measure was developed and validated using a general population sample (internet panel survey (n = 1,262)) and a clinical sample (patients attending sexual problems clinics (n = 100). Confirmatory factor analysis established that a ‘general-specific model’ had the best fit and was equivalent between general population and clinical samples (Comparative Fit Index = 0.963 Tucker Lewis Index = 0.951; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.064). The 17-item Natsal-SF is positively associated with the Female Sexual Function Index-6 (B = 0.572) and Brief Sexual Function Questionnaire for men (B = 0.705); it can discriminate between clinical and general population groups (OR = 2.667); and it has good test–retest reliability (r = 0.72). The Natsal-SF provides an estimate of the level of sexual function in the last year. By including items on distress about sex and sexual relationships, and by being relevant to all regardless of sexual lifestyle, it addresses some of the gaps in current measurement design.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
We estimated the general-specific model excluding this item and obtained the following indices of fit: CFI = 0.957, TLI = 0.941, RMSEA 0.069. They all indicate the acceptable fit of the model, although their values are slightly inferior for those obtained from the original model.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Daker-White G. Reliable and valid self-report outcome measures in sexual (dys)function: a systematic review. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(2):197–209.PubMedCrossRef Daker-White G. Reliable and valid self-report outcome measures in sexual (dys)function: a systematic review. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(2):197–209.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arrington R, Cofrancesco J, Wu AW. Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1643–58.PubMedCrossRef Arrington R, Cofrancesco J, Wu AW. Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1643–58.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Corona G, Jannini E, Maggi M. Inventories for male and female sexual dysfunctions. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:236–50.PubMedCrossRef Corona G, Jannini E, Maggi M. Inventories for male and female sexual dysfunctions. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:236–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR, Assendelft WJ. Systematic review of sexual problems: epidemiology and methodology. J Sex Mar Ther. 2002;28(5):399–422.CrossRef Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR, Assendelft WJ. Systematic review of sexual problems: epidemiology and methodology. J Sex Mar Ther. 2002;28(5):399–422.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208.PubMedCrossRef Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–30.PubMedCrossRef Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–30.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference World Health Organization. ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th ed. Geneva: WHO; 1992. World Health Organization. ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th ed. Geneva: WHO; 1992.
9.
go back to reference Oberg K, Fugl-Meyer A, Fugl-Meyer K. On categorization and quantification of women’s sexual dysfunctions: an epidemiological approach. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16:261–9.PubMedCrossRef Oberg K, Fugl-Meyer A, Fugl-Meyer K. On categorization and quantification of women’s sexual dysfunctions: an epidemiological approach. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16:261–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Graham C, Bancroft J. Assessing the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction with surveys; what is feasible? In: Goldstein I, Meston C, Davis S, Traish A, editors. Women’s sexual function and dysfunction: study, diagnosis and treatment. UK: Taylor and Francis; 2005. Graham C, Bancroft J. Assessing the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction with surveys; what is feasible? In: Goldstein I, Meston C, Davis S, Traish A, editors. Women’s sexual function and dysfunction: study, diagnosis and treatment. UK: Taylor and Francis; 2005.
12.
go back to reference Erens B, McManus S, Field J, Korovessis C, Johnson AM, Fenton K, Wellings K. National survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles II: technical report. London: National Centre for Social Research; 2001. Erens B, McManus S, Field J, Korovessis C, Johnson AM, Fenton K, Wellings K. National survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles II: technical report. London: National Centre for Social Research; 2001.
13.
go back to reference Johnson AM, Mercer CH, Erens B, Copas AJ, McManus S, Wellings K, Fenton K, Korovessis C, Macdowall W, Nanchahal K, Purdon S, Field J. Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet. 2001;358:1835–42.PubMedCrossRef Johnson AM, Mercer CH, Erens B, Copas AJ, McManus S, Wellings K, Fenton K, Korovessis C, Macdowall W, Nanchahal K, Purdon S, Field J. Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet. 2001;358:1835–42.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mercer CH, Fenton KA, Johnson AM, Wellings K, Macdowall W, McManus S, Nanchahal K, Erens B. Sexual function problems and help seeking behaviour in Britain: national probability sample survey. BMJ. 2003;327:426–7.PubMedCrossRef Mercer CH, Fenton KA, Johnson AM, Wellings K, Macdowall W, McManus S, Nanchahal K, Erens B. Sexual function problems and help seeking behaviour in Britain: national probability sample survey. BMJ. 2003;327:426–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Derogatis LR. The Derogatis interview for sexual functioning (DISF/DISF-SR): an introductory report. J Sex Mar Ther. 1997;23:291–304.CrossRef Derogatis LR. The Derogatis interview for sexual functioning (DISF/DISF-SR): an introductory report. J Sex Mar Ther. 1997;23:291–304.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Isidori AM, Pozza C, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Morano S, Vignozzi L, Corona G, Lenzi A, Jannini EA. Development and validation of a 6-item version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) as a diagnostic tool for female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7(3):1139–46.PubMedCrossRef Isidori AM, Pozza C, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Morano S, Vignozzi L, Corona G, Lenzi A, Jannini EA. Development and validation of a 6-item version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) as a diagnostic tool for female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7(3):1139–46.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Reynolds CF, Frank E, Thase ME, Houck J, Jennings R, Howell JR, Lilienfeld SO, Kupfer DJ. Assessment of sexual function in depressed, impotent and healthy men: factor analysis of a brief sexual function questionnaire for men. Psychiatry Res. 1988;24:231–50.PubMedCrossRef Reynolds CF, Frank E, Thase ME, Houck J, Jennings R, Howell JR, Lilienfeld SO, Kupfer DJ. Assessment of sexual function in depressed, impotent and healthy men: factor analysis of a brief sexual function questionnaire for men. Psychiatry Res. 1988;24:231–50.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Muthen B. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical-data. J Econom. 1983;22(1–2):43–65.CrossRef Muthen B. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical-data. J Econom. 1983;22(1–2):43–65.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Muthen B. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika. 1984;49(1):115–32.CrossRef Muthen B. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika. 1984;49(1):115–32.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mutthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus user’s guide, 4th edn. In: Muthen M, editor. Los Angeles, CA; 1998–2007. Mutthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus user’s guide, 4th edn. In: Muthen M, editor. Los Angeles, CA; 1998–2007.
21.
go back to reference Little RJA, Rubin DB. The analysis of social-science data with missing values. Sociol Methods Res. 1989;18(2–3):292–326.CrossRef Little RJA, Rubin DB. The analysis of social-science data with missing values. Sociol Methods Res. 1989;18(2–3):292–326.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. Chichester: Willey; 2002. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. Chichester: Willey; 2002.
24.
go back to reference Bethlehem J. Selection bias in web surveys. Int Stat Rev. 2010;78(2):161–88.CrossRef Bethlehem J. Selection bias in web surveys. Int Stat Rev. 2010;78(2):161–88.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Couper MP, Miller PV. Web survey methods introduction. Publ Opin Q. 2008;72(5):831–5.CrossRef Couper MP, Miller PV. Web survey methods introduction. Publ Opin Q. 2008;72(5):831–5.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hayes RD, Bennett CM, Fairley CK, Dennerstein L. What can prevalence studies tell us about female sexual difficulty and dysfunction? J Sex Med. 2006;3:589–95.PubMedCrossRef Hayes RD, Bennett CM, Fairley CK, Dennerstein L. What can prevalence studies tell us about female sexual difficulty and dysfunction? J Sex Med. 2006;3:589–95.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Natsal-SF: a validated measure of sexual function for use in community surveys
Authors
Kirstin R. Mitchell
George B. Ploubidis
Jessica Datta
Kaye Wellings
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9697-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2012 Go to the issue